this post was submitted on 30 Mar 2025
24 points (100.0% liked)

TechTakes

1750 readers
62 users here now

Big brain tech dude got yet another clueless take over at HackerNews etc? Here's the place to vent. Orange site, VC foolishness, all welcome.

This is not debate club. Unless it’s amusing debate.

For actually-good tech, you want our NotAwfulTech community

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Need to let loose a primal scream without collecting footnotes first? Have a sneer percolating in your system but not enough time/energy to make a whole post about it? Go forth and be mid: Welcome to the Stubsack, your first port of call for learning fresh Awful you’ll near-instantly regret.

Any awful.systems sub may be subsneered in this subthread, techtakes or no.

If your sneer seems higher quality than you thought, feel free to cut’n’paste it into its own post — there’s no quota for posting and the bar really isn’t that high.

The post Xitter web has spawned soo many “esoteric” right wing freaks, but there’s no appropriate sneer-space for them. I’m talking redscare-ish, reality challenged “culture critics” who write about everything but understand nothing. I’m talking about reply-guys who make the same 6 tweets about the same 3 subjects. They’re inescapable at this point, yet I don’t see them mocked (as much as they should be)

Like, there was one dude a while back who insisted that women couldn’t be surgeons because they didn’t believe in the moon or in stars? I think each and every one of these guys is uniquely fucked up and if I can’t escape them, I would love to sneer at them.

(Credit and/or blame to David Gerard for starting this. Also, happy April Fool's in advance.)

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] BlueMonday1984@awful.systems 6 points 1 day ago (1 children)

"i have followed these fucks for 15 years in detail and i still don’t know how to properly explain them to our lovely pivot-to-ai readers"

Personally, focusing on their whacko beliefs around the Impending AI Apocalypse^tm^ seems like a good place to start.

[–] dgerard@awful.systems 11 points 1 day ago (1 children)

"Yudkowsky sincerely believes the following. You'll recognise it because Altman uses it as marketing buzzwords."

[–] istewart@awful.systems 7 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

"This Is What Yudkowsky Actually Believes" seems like a subtitle that would get heavy use in a future episode of South Park about Cartman dropping out after one semester at community college.

[–] BlueMonday1984@awful.systems 4 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

If South Park ever does get around to TESCREAL, I imagine Parker and Stone would have a goddamn field day with them.

[–] Architeuthis@awful.systems 5 points 9 hours ago

No idea where they would land on what to mock and what to take seriously from this whole mess.

Don't know what they're up to these days but last time I checked I had them pegged as enlightened centrists whose style of satire is having strong beliefs about stuff is cringe more than it is ever having to say anything of even accidental substance about said things.