this post was submitted on 04 Apr 2025
557 points (96.6% liked)

World News

45455 readers
5063 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Summary

A new Innofact poll shows 55% of Germans support returning to nuclear power, a divisive issue influencing coalition talks between the CDU/CSU and SPD.

While 36% oppose the shift, support is strongest among men and in southern and eastern Germany.

About 22% favor restarting recently closed reactors; 32% support building new ones.

Despite nuclear support, 57% still back investment in renewables. The CDU/CSU is exploring feasibility, but the SPD and Greens remain firmly against reversing the nuclear phase-out, citing stability and past policy shifts.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Jumi@lemmy.world 7 points 12 hours ago (4 children)

We have an almost indefinite source of energy below our feet and almost nobody talks about. Screw nuclear, go geothermal

[–] GreyEyedGhost@lemmy.ca 5 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

I generally agree, given that geothermal and solar keep getting cheaper, and now cost less than nuclear or are at least competitive, but nuclear plants do more than just provide energy. Where do you think medical isotopes come from?

[–] Jumi@lemmy.world 0 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

If that's the only point you have for nuclear power we have more in common than you think. And I'm sure there a ways to do that another specialised way.

[–] GreyEyedGhost@lemmy.ca 1 points 8 hours ago

Atomic transmutation is never easy, and the only thing that really scales is a nuclear reactor. And not just any nuclear reactor will do - breeder reactors are the only ones that make it in any quantity. If you want to make this using a cyclotron or with centrifuges, a lot of the diagnoses and treatments we take for granted today will be almost completely inaccessible and only available to the very wealthy.

[–] lumony@lemmings.world 12 points 11 hours ago (3 children)

It's not an either-or.

We need as many sources of energy as possible to increase the available supply and reduce the cost.

[–] chaosrider@lemm.ee 4 points 10 hours ago

I would usually accept. But looking at the cost of production and how the pricing is set (highest price sets the bar), nuclear is the worst. Its so expensive that no supplier even wants to take the grants to build it. A waste of money… building storage capacities and evolving smart grids would be better investments.

[–] Jumi@lemmy.world 1 points 11 hours ago

Maybe Thorium reactors but not that other shit that poisons everything for millenia.

[–] taladar@sh.itjust.works -1 points 9 hours ago

Said like someone who has never encountered the concept of opportunity costs.

[–] friendlymessage@feddit.org 2 points 8 hours ago

Geothermal energy is possible anywhere but not economical everywhere. Building wind and PV and building infrastructure to save the energy is more economical in many cases.

[–] InvertedParallax@lemm.ee 2 points 8 hours ago

Doesn't work everywhere.