this post was submitted on 06 Apr 2025
795 points (99.0% liked)

Climate - truthful information about climate, related activism and politics.

6343 readers
630 users here now

Discussion of climate, how it is changing, activism around that, the politics, and the energy systems change we need in order to stabilize things.

As a starting point, the burning of fossil fuels, and to a lesser extent deforestation and release of methane are responsible for the warming in recent decades: Graph of temperature as observed with significant warming, and simulated without added greenhouse gases and other anthropogentic changes, which shows no significant warming

How much each change to the atmosphere has warmed the world: IPCC AR6 Figure 2 - Thee bar charts: first chart: how much each gas has warmed the world.  About 1C of total warming.  Second chart:  about 1.5C of total warming from well-mixed greenhouse gases, offset by 0.4C of cooling from aerosols and negligible influence from changes to solar output, volcanoes, and internal variability.  Third chart: about 1.25C of warming from CO2, 0.5C from methane, and a bunch more in small quantities from other gases.  About 0.5C of cooling with large error bars from SO2.

Recommended actions to cut greenhouse gas emissions in the near future:

Anti-science, inactivism, and unsupported conspiracy theories are not ok here.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Access options:

Yes, this means a ton of carbon ends up in the atmosphere instead of in the trees. The right move would be thinning and prescribed burns, but this administration isn't going to do that.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Butterpaderp@lemmy.world 12 points 1 day ago (2 children)

"They're gonna chop down national forests"

"bUt WhAT aBoUt ThE iNdIaNs???"

bruh

[–] Bloomcole@lemmy.world -4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

“bUt WhAT aBoUt ThE iNdIaNs???”

bruh

The opinion of people who write like this can't be take seriously

[–] baines@lemmy.cafe -2 points 1 day ago (2 children)

more like ‘now you care? lol’

[–] suite403@lemmy.world 8 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Sorry I didn't care 400 years ago. I'll try harder.

[–] baines@lemmy.cafe 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

it’s happening to native lands in the US while we speak, the fact you are not even aware earns the ‘lol’

[–] Fluke@lemm.ee 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

How many cared when it was decided there would be an oil pipeline through the pittance they were relegated to? More land stolen, and everything around it polluted in time to add insult to injury.

Did you care then, just a few years ago?

[–] suite403@lemmy.world 7 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] baines@lemmy.cafe 0 points 1 day ago

that’s better than nothing but that’s self interest and farmers were right to be worried

none of that changes anything on a national level nor changed the actual outcome so the criticism is still valid