this post was submitted on 06 Apr 2025
744 points (99.1% liked)

Climate - truthful information about climate, related activism and politics.

6343 readers
716 users here now

Discussion of climate, how it is changing, activism around that, the politics, and the energy systems change we need in order to stabilize things.

As a starting point, the burning of fossil fuels, and to a lesser extent deforestation and release of methane are responsible for the warming in recent decades: Graph of temperature as observed with significant warming, and simulated without added greenhouse gases and other anthropogentic changes, which shows no significant warming

How much each change to the atmosphere has warmed the world: IPCC AR6 Figure 2 - Thee bar charts: first chart: how much each gas has warmed the world. About 1C of total warming. Second chart: about 1.5C of total warming from well-mixed greenhouse gases, offset by 0.4C of cooling from aerosols and negligible influence from changes to solar output, volcanoes, and internal variability. Third chart: about 1.25C of warming from CO2, 0.5C from methane, and a bunch more in small quantities from other gases. About 0.5C of cooling with large error bars from SO2.

Recommended actions to cut greenhouse gas emissions in the near future:

Anti-science, inactivism, and unsupported conspiracy theories are not ok here.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
silence7@slrpnk.net
744
Trump administration orders half of national forests open for logging (wapo.st)
submitted 1 day ago by silence7@slrpnk.net to c/climate@slrpnk.net
167 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

Access options:

Yes, this means a ton of carbon ends up in the atmosphere instead of in the trees. The right move would be thinning and prescribed burns, but this administration isn't going to do that.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Deringaboo@lemmy.world 22 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (4 children)

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tree_spiking

This is my reccomendation to this news. Remember, put the spike atleast 9ft up, use a non-ferrous material so the detectors don't catch em, and wood glue the bark chunk back overtop.

Once they destroy more than one saw on randomly selected trees, the logging company recognizes the forest as non-viable due to high cost sawmill blade replacements.

Note: pretty sure this is a federal crime btw, so do with that information what you will

[–] jagged_circle@feddit.nl 1 points 8 hours ago

Ohhh, I always thought it was to break the saw that was cutting them down, not the mill.

[–] Mirshe@lemmy.world 1 points 8 hours ago

For those who don't want to potentially kill people with flying saw blade pieces, look up the resistance to the Mountain Valley pipeline. It costs a TON to get this heavy equipment into position and build roads to get the felled trees OUT. Even just establishing a bunch of treesits (or supporting those treesits) in the areas where they're building roads or planning to log can be incredibly expensive and disruptive to the planned project - and hurt the profit line, which is all that matters.

[–] Agent641@lemmy.world 9 points 22 hours ago* (last edited 22 hours ago)

Check out Burning Rage of a Dying Planet, And other books by Craig Rosebraugh and Leslie James Pickering, like the yearly global dispatches of the ELF to remind yourself what you absolutely should NOT do to disrupt logging, development and corporate greed.

[–] stormdahl@lemmy.world 6 points 23 hours ago

That's really interesting. I doubt a comment like this would be allowed to remain on Reddit, which is a shame because it naturally would reach a lot more people.