No Stupid Questions
No such thing. Ask away!
!nostupidquestions is a community dedicated to being helpful and answering each others' questions on various topics.
The rules for posting and commenting, besides the rules defined here for lemmy.world, are as follows:
Rules (interactive)
Rule 1- All posts must be legitimate questions. All post titles must include a question.
All posts must be legitimate questions, and all post titles must include a question. Questions that are joke or trolling questions, memes, song lyrics as title, etc. are not allowed here. See Rule 6 for all exceptions.
Rule 2- Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material.
Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material. You will be warned first, banned second.
Rule 3- Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here.
Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here. Breaking this rule will not get you or your post removed, but it will put you at risk, and possibly in danger.
Rule 4- No self promotion or upvote-farming of any kind.
That's it.
Rule 5- No baiting or sealioning or promoting an agenda.
Questions which, instead of being of an innocuous nature, are specifically intended (based on reports and in the opinion of our crack moderation team) to bait users into ideological wars on charged political topics will be removed and the authors warned - or banned - depending on severity.
Rule 6- Regarding META posts and joke questions.
Provided it is about the community itself, you may post non-question posts using the [META] tag on your post title.
On fridays, you are allowed to post meme and troll questions, on the condition that it's in text format only, and conforms with our other rules. These posts MUST include the [NSQ Friday] tag in their title.
If you post a serious question on friday and are looking only for legitimate answers, then please include the [Serious] tag on your post. Irrelevant replies will then be removed by moderators.
Rule 7- You can't intentionally annoy, mock, or harass other members.
If you intentionally annoy, mock, harass, or discriminate against any individual member, you will be removed.
Likewise, if you are a member, sympathiser or a resemblant of a movement that is known to largely hate, mock, discriminate against, and/or want to take lives of a group of people, and you were provably vocal about your hate, then you will be banned on sight.
Rule 8- All comments should try to stay relevant to their parent content.
Rule 9- Reposts from other platforms are not allowed.
Let everyone have their own content.
Rule 10- Majority of bots aren't allowed to participate here. This includes using AI responses and summaries.
Credits
Our breathtaking icon was bestowed upon us by @Cevilia!
The greatest banner of all time: by @TheOneWithTheHair!
view the rest of the comments
"americans" is a bad name but it's more specific than "united statesians". But I would fully support dissolving that country and founding a new one (or multiple) with a better name.
I'm not OP. As someone whose native language isn't English, I agree with OP that something like "united statesians" would be more specific than just "american" to refer to someone belonging to the US. A united statesian would be only from US, whereas someone just american could be referring to anyone in the American continent - both North and South.
And that's exactly how Spanish language deals with the issue. Native Spanish speakers understand that colloquially, american means someone from US and wouldn't call a Canadian or a Brazilian an American. However it does lend itself to confusion, it is a question often raised by children when learning adjectives, and as far as adjectives go, things other than people (animals for example) usually follow the regular rules of language. Finally, Spanish speakers also say "united statesians" ( * estadounidense* ) instead of "american" when referring to people living in US.
There are other united states than the United States of America, for example The United Mexican States (Mexico)
Mexicans call themselves mexicans in Spanish, and refer to their country as just Mexico even if it is formally " united mexican states". Also note is "mexican" and doesn't say "american" anywhere, so I still don't see where the confusion would be, at least not in Spanish language ( which mexicans also speak). The only country in the world that refers to itself as a continent (that also comprises other countries) both formally and colloquially is USA.
Edit: "that also comprises other countries" because yes Australia fits the bill.
I've not known any USA residents that call the continent as "America". Instead, the continent -- which in this case basically just means USA + Canada -- would be "North America". And if they meant the whole post-1490s "New World", it would be "The Americas" for both North and South America together.
Agree, I also don't know of any USA residents doing so. But outside it's a very different story especially in places where the language isn't English.
What is the demonym for something that can be found or belongs to "The Americas", comprising both North and South America (and potentially Central if you go by the Three Americas way of splitting the continent)?
Why is it that you have terms such as "North American" to describe something related to USA+anything north in the continent, then you have another term such as "South American" for anything Mexico and south of it in the continent, but when you say American , that's right, the generic one that doesn't specify and encompasses it all then it is presumed to be exclusively USA? I understand the history that explains that, but as far as semantics go, it's still a legitimate question. Languages other than English have different answers for it.
This is a fair question, and I suspect there simply is no generally accepted demonym in English. One could be introduced, but contrast that fairly simple exercise with the replacement of the broadly-recognized demonym for USA residents: "American". Quickly, it becomes apparent that replacement is far harder than introducing a new demonym, even if the to-be-replaced demonym itself isn't very logical within the English language.
English is the same language that calls people from Deutschland as "German", and then American English specifically might also call them "Dutch", as in, the Pennsylvania Dutch, whom immigrated from Germany. Consistency is not strong in the English language, even over only a few hundred years.
Australia.
True but it has no other countries in it. Which is the whole point OP is making.