this post was submitted on 10 Apr 2025
432 points (100.0% liked)

News

28599 readers
3192 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

The Supreme Court on Thursday said President Donald Trump’s administration must facilitate the return of Kilmar Abrego Garcia, a Maryland man who was mistakenly deported to El Salvador, rejecting the administration’s emergency appeal

The administration claims Abrego Garcia is a member of the MS-13 gang, though his attorneys said there is no evidence he was in the gang, and he has never been charged with or convicted of a crime.

The administration has conceded that it made a mistake in sending him to El Salvador, where he is being held in a notorious prison, but also argued that it no longer could do anything about it.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] SeaJ@lemm.ee 23 points 2 days ago (4 children)

My bet: he will take the Andrew Jackson route.

[–] mic_check_one_two@lemmy.dbzer0.com 30 points 2 days ago (2 children)

For the confused: The SCOTUS ruled that Jackson wasn’t allowed to force the native Americans off of their lands and onto reservations. Jackson responded with something along the lines of “they’ve made their decision, now let’s see them enforce it.” He pushed ahead with the reservations anyways, which led to the Trail of Tears.

Until fairly recently, it has been the most direct “fuck you I won’t do what you tell me” between a president and the SCOTUS. It led to Jackson’s opponents sarcastically dubbing him “King Andrew”.

[–] tal@lemmy.today 5 points 2 days ago

It sounds like Jackson didn't refuse to perform any enforcement of SCOTUS decisions. Rather, he observed that Georgia


which was the entity supposed to do so, wasn't likely to do so. Georgia ultimately did back down.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Worcester_v._Georgia

Worcester v. Georgia, 31 U.S. (6 Pet.) 515 (1832), was a landmark case in which the United States Supreme Court vacated the conviction of Samuel Worcester and held that the Georgia criminal statute that prohibited non-Native Americans from being present on Native American lands without a license from the state was unconstitutional.

In a popular quotation that is believed to be apocryphal, President Andrew Jackson reportedly responded: "John Marshall has made his decision; now let him enforce it!"[7][8] This quotation first appeared twenty years after Jackson's death in newspaper publisher Horace Greeley's 1865 history of the U.S. Civil War, The American Conflict.[8] It was reported in the press in March 1832 that Jackson was unlikely to aid in carrying out the court's decision if his assistance were to be requested.[9] In an April 1832 letter to John Coffee, Jackson wrote that "the decision of the Supreme Court has fell still born, and they find that they cannot coerce Georgia to yield to its mandate."[7][10] In a letter in March 1832, Virginia politician David Campbell reported a private conversation in which Jackson had "sportively" suggested calling on the Massachusetts state militia to enforce the order if the Supreme Court requested he intervene, because Jackson believed Northern partisans had brought about the court's ruling.[10]

The Court did not ask federal marshals to carry out the decision.[11] Worcester thus imposed no obligations on Jackson; there was nothing for him to enforce,[12][13] although Jackson's political enemies conspired to find evidence, to be used in the forthcoming political election, to claim that he would refuse to enforce the Worcester decision.

Eighteen days later, on November 24, the state of South Carolina issued an Ordinance of Nullification, a separate and unrelated attempt by a state to defy federal authority.[18] This began a series of events known as the Nullification Crisis. In an effort to isolate Georgia from South Carolina, the Jackson administration changed course in their approach to the Worcester decision.

On December 22, Georgia repealed the law under which Worcester and Butler were imprisoned, allowing them to petition for a pardon without having to take an oath to leave the state of Georgia or Cherokee land.[27] On January 8, 1833, the missionaries petitioned for their pardon, but it did not contain an admission they had broken state law, and Lumpkin believed its wording was insulting to the state of Georgia. Representatives for both sides negotiated for a new letter to be drafted by the missionaries, which was delivered to Lumpkin the following day. In the final letter, Worcester and Butler appealed to the "magnanimity of the State" of Georgia to end their prison sentences.[28] On January 14, Lumpkin issued a general proclamation,[29] not a formal pardon.[30] Worcester and Butler were freed from prison.[31]

[–] SeaJ@lemm.ee 9 points 2 days ago

Unsurprisingly he is Trump's favorite president.

[–] vvilld@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 2 days ago

I guarantee you there's going to be a fuck ton of obnoxious fascists on Reddit and Twitter quoting the fuck out of Jackson today.

[–] ZMonster@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

He's going to commission a 600 lb wheel of cheese and leave it on the white house lawn? Or did you mean beating an assassin with a cane? In this moment I have been completely consumed with the possible meanings of "The Andrew Jackson Route." Jesus fuck, that could be literally mean anything. But all bad, no doubt.

[–] SeaJ@lemm.ee 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Specifically Jackson ignoring the Supreme Court's ruling that states can't uproot thousands of Natives and move them. He is said to have commented "John Marshall has made his decision; now let him enforce it." So Georgia was able to steal a ton of Cherokee land and kick off the Trail of Tears.

A 600 lb wheel of cheese? Jesus. I've seen big wheels of cheese in my day but that one would take the cake.

[–] ZMonster@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago

Oops, I got the weight wrong. I was way under. It was likely well over 1000 lbs.

Just a grand ol' fuckin time

Ah yes. The absolute peak of prosperity, getting an enormous waste of resources from incredibly conflicted organizations.

!jesus!< >!titty!< >!fucking!< >!christ!<

[–] HowAbt2morrow@futurology.today -1 points 2 days ago (1 children)
[–] geekwithsoul@lemm.ee 7 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I believe you're thinking Jefferson though Jackson did own enslaved people

[–] HowAbt2morrow@futurology.today 5 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Jackson was a less well known slave raper that Jefferson.

[–] geekwithsoul@lemm.ee 4 points 2 days ago

Unlike Jefferson, I don't believe there were any contemporaneous accounts of it, and there's never been any DNA evidence to confirm it. I mean Jackson was undoubtedly an asshole and believed in the institution of slavery (and I believe treated enslaved people inhumanely), but as far as I understood it, not for this in particular.