this post was submitted on 14 May 2025
150 points (99.3% liked)

Canada

9681 readers
691 users here now

What's going on Canada?



Related Communities


🍁 Meta


🗺️ Provinces / Territories


🏙️ Cities / Local Communities

Sorted alphabetically by city name.


🏒 SportsHockey

Football (NFL): incomplete

Football (CFL): incomplete

Baseball

Basketball

Soccer


💻 Schools / Universities

Sorted by province, then by total full-time enrolment.


💵 Finance, Shopping, Sales


🗣️ Politics


🍁 Social / Culture


Rules

  1. Keep the original title when submitting an article. You can put your own commentary in the body of the post or in the comment section.

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage: lemmy.ca


founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] hark@lemmy.world 4 points 3 days ago (1 children)

No party wants prices to fall because the economy is so built around ever-increasing prices that if prices do fall then the economy falls with it.

[–] toastmeister@lemmy.ca 0 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (2 children)

Whataboutism eh.

"Maybe the cons would have been equally bad!"

[–] hark@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago (1 children)

It's not whataboutism to point out that the Canadian economy is way too reliant on house prices continually going up. It's a huge chunk of GDP and would instantly mean a technical recession if prices went down (even when ignoring the domino effect the panic would cause, deepening the downturn).

The country is trapped and no one wants to risk their political career by springing that trap, even if it's healthier in the long run.

[–] toastmeister@lemmy.ca 0 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Sure though the Cons said they would do it, and they would grow GDP via pipelines and deregulation. Pierre explicitly ran on lower home values.

that's not whataboutism it's a better description of the situation than you could manage