this post was submitted on 15 May 2025
710 points (98.6% liked)

politics

23538 readers
2259 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Supreme Court Justice Amy Coney Barrett triggered fierce backlash from MAGA loyalists after forcefully questioning the Trump administration's top lawyer and voicing skepticism over ending birthright citizenship during a heated Supreme Court argument.

Since taking office, Donald Trump has pushed for an executive order to end birthright citizenship, a constitutional guarantee under the 14th Amendment that grants automatic U.S. citizenship to anyone born on American soil.

During oral arguments, Barrett confronted Solicitor General Dean John Sauer, who was representing the Trump administration, over his dismissive response to Justice Elena Kagan's concerns. Barrett sharply asked whether Sauer truly believed there was "no way" for plaintiffs to quickly challenge the executive order, suggesting that class-action certification might expedite the process.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Have you heard anything from Roberts or Barrett in the last month? They’re not putting up with any of this anymore. Roberts explicitly called out the administration’s attempts to circumvent the Constitution and had a speech on how we need to protect the rule of law. They’ve both been voting reasonably in regards to human rights. They’re still both fiscally conservative, however.

[–] Amnesigenic@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

That’s all we need with Breyer, Kagan, and Sotomayor. Although many of the more recent rulings included Kavanaugh and Gorsuch as well.

[–] Amnesigenic@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

A handful of halfway decent people are definitely not all we need. It's better than nothing for sure, but nowhere near enough to stop what's happening to this country

[–] disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

There are only nine Justices on SCOTUS. That’s who I’ve been talking about. We only need 5 for majority, and have been getting 7. There are two Trump loyalists, Alito and Thomas.

[–] Amnesigenic@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

All 9 of them together wouldn't be enough to stop what's happening

[–] disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

That’s literally what this whole thread and post was about. Lol

[–] Amnesigenic@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

You literally said "that's all we need" like 3 comments ago, you have been and continue to be wrong

[–] disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world 0 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Dude, how is this topic still confusing to you? There are three co-equal branches of government. SCOTUS is one of them. They can check the power of POTUS. There are 9 Justices on SCOTUS. Three are liberal. We need 2 more to vote reasonably to have a 5/9 majority. We’ve been getting 7/9 votes in favor of civil rights for the last three months.

Take a civics class instead of debating people to learn how the government works.

[–] Amnesigenic@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 day ago

Idk what part of me pointing out that you're directly contradicting yourself made you want to post a paragraph from a children's social studies book, have you perhaps considered logging off entirely