this post was submitted on 17 May 2025
62 points (95.6% liked)
Games
38610 readers
1353 users here now
Welcome to the largest gaming community on Lemmy! Discussion for all kinds of games. Video games, tabletop games, card games etc.
Weekly Threads:
Rules:
-
Submissions have to be related to games
-
No bigotry or harassment, be civil
-
No excessive self-promotion
-
Stay on-topic; no memes, funny videos, giveaways, reposts, or low-effort posts
-
Mark Spoilers and NSFW
-
No linking to piracy
More information about the community rules can be found here and here.
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
2016 had the perfect balance between story and gameplay to me, in that the player character expressed flagrant disregard for any narrative elements. This was doom 1 af.
Just keep moving and turn the bad guys into chunks. Need nothing more.
I fucking hated the loop in eternal. I get that the developers wanted you to play in a specific way, they partially achieved this through arbitrary mechanics like ammo scarcity. I can appreciate that it's a good game, but I didn't get on with it.
The art style went full Hollywood horror, and the exposition was kinda dialed up to eleven by contrast to its direct predecessor. Very much disliked that you couldn't crouch (definitely more of a me issue, though I think sliding is a missed opportunity in Eternal's movement repertoire).
2016's PvP was imperfect but still fun and much appreciated. Snapmap was super underrated and has many sick community made levels.
The later games are a phenomenal technical showcase; the absolute posterchild for the Vulkan gfx API, but it's not very 'doom' in spirit to me any more
I remember physically pumping my fist in the air when the first exposition dump happens in doom 2016 and he just punches the screen seconds in then moves on. That’s all the narrative/storytelling I need or want out of doom. My buddy and I were thrilled when that happened lol
This is exactly how I view Doom as well.
If you want lore, put it in the environment. Let people hunt and find it (makes it more rewarding for those people too). But the core gameplay loop of doom needs to not have hours of exposition dump. The whole point of Doom guy is literally rip and tear. Not to give a shit about why he's ripping and tearing. He's a Marine. Simple motivations.
Source:https://doom.fandom.com/wiki/Doom_Slayer
There isn't a "reason" outside of pure rage that makes Doom guy. Doom guy would not give 2 fucking shits about "why", just murder and rage.
To tie this back to another topic, Mick Gordon fucking captured it perfectly in the music. No sense for the "norms" of music. Just pure rage in music form. It's cathartic. It was a perfect fit. And they fucked it up.
They don't. Doomguy does like two things in the very beginning, but it's not like they don't care, but rather about what Hayden has to say and his justifications for everything that has happened, that's the part which he doesn't want.
You meet Hayden later in his office, with a few minutes unskippable "cutscene," but it's not like Doomguy ignores him or jumps out of a window in the middle of it.