this post was submitted on 19 May 2025
1352 points (98.8% liked)

People Twitter

6995 readers
2329 users here now

People tweeting stuff. We allow tweets from anyone.

RULES:

  1. Mark NSFW content.
  2. No doxxing people.
  3. Must be a pic of the tweet or similar. No direct links to the tweet.
  4. No bullying or international politcs
  5. Be excellent to each other.
  6. Provide an archived link to the tweet (or similar) being shown if it's a major figure or a politician.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] MrJameGumb@lemmy.world 189 points 1 day ago (5 children)

I don't see how that's a "boomer" complaint lol I'm a millennial and don't know anyone that's excited to pay monthly fees for something they already bought

[–] scytale@lemm.ee 54 points 1 day ago (6 children)

Yeah. The subscription model really only took off during GenZ.

[–] Jiggle_Physics@sh.itjust.works 51 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

not only that, but people usually use boomer, in this context, to say that the complaint is stupid, or selfish, or something

the gradual loss of ownership is a real fucking issue

[–] Bytemeister@lemmy.world 15 points 1 day ago (2 children)

In the future, you'll own nothing and like it!

Wait, you guys own something?

[–] ugo@feddit.it 5 points 1 day ago

Why wait? You can already own nothing

[–] abbadon420@lemm.ee 6 points 1 day ago

"Boomer" has lost all meaning. It has just become an empty counter for when you disagree with someone but you lack the emotional intelligence to have an actual discussion about something other the superficial.

[–] FundMECFSResearch@lemmy.blahaj.zone 10 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

And no gen-Z is happy about this model or pushing its use. It’s mostly being pushed by Gen-X and Boomer executives as a further mode of profit extraction in our rentier economic system.

[–] zout@fedia.io 13 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Sure, we'll just wait for the gen-Z executives to roll it al back then right? It'll never happen, this is a money thing, not a generation thing.

that's the point I was trying to make

[–] dohpaz42@lemmy.world 11 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I’ve always blamed Adobe for the subscription mess, and that started in the early 00’s.

[–] ZeffSyde@lemmy.world 2 points 2 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago)

My vintage copy of Adobe CS6 needs knee surgery at this point.

[–] atomicbocks@sh.itjust.works 10 points 1 day ago (1 children)

There was a joke about “rethinking the Microsoft model” in a 2005 episode of The Office. The move to subscription based software has been in the works for 25 years or more.

[–] Geetnerd@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

This has been the goal of Microsoft for 20 years, like you stated. Bill Gates stated it. We're just now to the point of ubiquitous internet connectivity, and cultural conditioning to accept this model.

Windows itself is eventually going to be a subscription service, with all your data saved on Microsoft's servers. Microsoft announced at the end of last year a dumb Office terminal that does just this, to test the waters.

Because that's when the infrastructure started getting developed to support that model

[–] anomnom@sh.itjust.works 10 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

I blame iPhone and Android apps that required developers to keep paying a $100 minimum yearly fee to keep an app in the App Store.

There were tons $1-$5 apps in the early days of the stores, but 3-4 years in they switched to either freemium subscriptions or adware (or ad ransom models). Usually as publishers bought out indie devs, if they just didn’t copy them anyway.

[–] ZMoney@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago (2 children)

It's because a lot of boomers own their homes and the concept of rent is foreign to them.

[–] ZeffSyde@lemmy.world 1 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

I really don't understand why people call themselves homeowners when they are paying off a 30 year mortgage.

Feels like rent with extra steps.

[–] ZMoney@lemmy.world 2 points 2 hours ago

I mean it depends on whether they actually pay it off. Many boomers were able to leverage the explosion in housing prices into paying off their cheap mortgages ahead of time. The boomer success metric is actually based on this principle. Buy a $150k house in 1998. Sell it in 2018 for $450k. The mortgage is irrelevant.

The obvious problem with this is that it completely fucks over the next generation.

[–] Geetnerd@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago

The thing is, you never really "own" your home. Don't pay your property taxes, and see what happens. You just pay less when the mortgage loan is paid off.

[–] dreamless_day@feddit.org 0 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Because software needs to be maintained. Well at least most software that has a subscription model is maintained and gets regular updates. People don’t work for free, you have to pay them

[–] ChicoSuave@lemmy.world 10 points 1 day ago (2 children)

That's the result of a fucked business model. Many software devs came and went prior to the subscription model. Technofeudalism is not wanted by anyone but the software publishers.

[–] Geetnerd@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

To them, it's the perfect business model. Keep you customers in perpetual debt, and dependent.

[–] dreamless_day@feddit.org -3 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

I don’t think you can compare software from like 20 years ago to software today.

Things got way more complicated and applications require a lot more work

[–] Zaphod@discuss.tchncs.de 0 points 1 day ago

Most boomers don't even use any paid software aside from Windows and an antivirus they got tricked into buying