this post was submitted on 28 May 2025
768 points (99.4% liked)

Humor

8342 readers
1 users here now

"Laugh-a-Palooza: Unleash Your Inner Chuckle!"

Rules


Read Full Rules Here!


Rule 1: Keep it light-hearted. This community is dedicated to humor and laughter, so let’s keep the tone light and positive.


Rule 2: Respectful Engagement. Keep it civil!


Rule 3: No spamming!


Rule 4: No explicit or NSFW content.


Rule 5: Stay on topic. Keep your posts relevant to humor-related topics.


Rule 6: Moderators Discretion. The moderators retain the right to remove any content, ban users/bots if deemed necessary.


Please report any violation of rules!


Warning: Strict compliance with all the rules is imperative. Failure to read and adhere to them will not be tolerated. Violations may result in immediate removal of your content and a permanent ban from the community.


We retain the discretion to modify the rules as we deem necessary.


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Remember_the_tooth@lemmy.world 12 points 5 days ago (1 children)
[–] jawa22@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 5 days ago (2 children)

It uses a line in for the video. It seems like a real desperation mover (or just showing off) to have the cable uncomfortably dangling from your wrist to the tuner. Still a cool idea for the time, though.

[–] PieMePlenty@lemmy.world 4 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Interestingly, this is possible without anything else today. It works totally different today than it did at that time, but the end result is the same: video on your watch. I'm always amazed by how tech moves. As a kid, I wondered how nice it would be if I had a device on me that did everything and I could even turn the lights off with it. I'm actually able to do that today.

[–] jawa22@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Yeah, Dick Tracy had nothing on modern smart watches.

[–] Remember_the_tooth@lemmy.world 4 points 5 days ago (1 children)

I highly agree. It's as impressive as a proof of concept and achievement as it is functionally useless. It's 100% Seiko flexing its capabilities at the time.

My focus here, however, is that I believe it's the worst way to watch Interstellar.

[–] dejected_warp_core@lemmy.world 4 points 5 days ago (1 children)

I dunno, someone could figure out how to watch it by mail.

[–] Remember_the_tooth@lemmy.world 2 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Are you reinventing Netflix, or are you suggesting someone might watch a movie through mailed pictures one frame at a time?

[–] dejected_warp_core@lemmy.world 3 points 5 days ago (2 children)

Mailed pictures. Individually. Worse than a tiny moving picture, and nowhere near as convenient as a book.

[–] NewSocialWhoDis@lemm.ee 4 points 5 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

When one of my good friends lost his mother, to help distract him, I enlarged this soft porn imagine of a woman in pirate gear showing what she's got. I blew it up to poster size or something, and then I printed it on a regular printer (along with a picture of a penis at approximately the right size and angle). I think that gave me 15ish individual pictures? I mixed them up and mailed him one per day, saving the goods for last, with the fakeout penis second to last.

I think he had a good chuckle. It was still on his wall months later when I went to visit him.

[–] Remember_the_tooth@lemmy.world 3 points 5 days ago (1 children)

That feeling when you accidentally hit the seek bar:

"Goddammit, Kevin! You just cost us decades!."