this post was submitted on 08 Jun 2025
674 points (97.7% liked)

Not The Onion

16607 readers
1078 users here now

Welcome

We're not The Onion! Not affiliated with them in any way! Not operated by them in any way! All the news here is real!

The Rules

Posts must be:

  1. Links to news stories from...
  2. ...credible sources, with...
  3. ...their original headlines, that...
  4. ...would make people who see the headline think, “That has got to be a story from The Onion, America’s Finest News Source.”

Please also avoid duplicates.

Comments and post content must abide by the server rules for Lemmy.world and generally abstain from trollish, bigoted, or otherwise disruptive behavior that makes this community less fun for everyone.

And that’s basically it!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] surph_ninja@lemmy.world 4 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

There’s companies openly doing this already. One idiot not being able to cite it doesn’t mean it’s not happening. Stop gaslighting people.

https://www.technologyreview.com/2022/12/24/1066041/a-startup-says-its-begun-releasing-particles-into-the-atmosphere-in-an-effort-to-tweak-the-climate/amp/

[–] remotelove@lemmy.ca 2 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

The point was not about if it was happening or not. It's about how these examples are used as fodder to keep the conspiracies flowing about chemtrails.

If you mix just the right amount of conspiracy with a little bit of fact, you get to keep all the votes from the crazies. It's super easy to use big words like "geoengineering" and twist them to imply that hormones are mixed with jet fuel.

[–] surph_ninja@lemmy.world 3 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

The point was not about if it was happening or not.

The title of the article literally claims it’s not happening, which is false.

[–] remotelove@lemmy.ca -2 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

The title of the article is referring to "chemtrails" as false. (You are blocked now too. So no point in responding.)

[–] surph_ninja@lemmy.world 3 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

The invocation of chemtrails was specifically on the part of the author of the article. If you actually read the details, the laws are restricting geoengineering.

And it’s worth commenting so your ignorance doesn’t stand for anyone else reading.

[–] BombOmOm@lemmy.world 3 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

Yeah, the bills specifically mention X, and The Guardian says 'something completely different is fake, therefore you should shit on the bill'. It's dishonest and makes people not trust The Guardian and the media in general.

[–] surph_ninja@lemmy.world 3 points 3 hours ago

It’s an issue I keep seeing with liberals, where they think it’s ok if they lie to people, because it’s for our own good. But conservatives lying is oh so evil.

In reality, they’re both just bullshitting to push whatever their donors want. Both are actively attacking democracy, as an informed public is required for democracy to function. Fucking tired of these geriatrics treating the entire populace like children.