this post was submitted on 10 Jun 2025
37 points (97.4% liked)

Satisfactory

1931 readers
81 users here now

The unofficial Lemmy community for Satisfactory, the factory-building and exploration game.

Useful Links:

Similar Communities !automationgames@lemmy.zip

Looking for Group?

@MentalEdge@sopuli.xyz started a dedicated server and welcomes Fediverse users, find out more by DMing them or joining this steam chat

Rules

  1. No bigotry - including racism, sexism, ableism, homophobia, transphobia, or xenophobia.
  2. Be respectful, especially when disagreeing. Everyone should feel welcome here.
  3. No NSFW content
  4. No ads/spamming

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] brennesel@discuss.tchncs.de 0 points 4 days ago (1 children)

In this update, they have openly explained their reasons for changing the way they handle the story: https://youtu.be/899Owtx-vz8

I know it can be disappointing to adjust your expectation, but they had to focus on the core features.

[–] FunnyUsername@lemmy.world 2 points 4 days ago (2 children)

i was still pretty bummed after being an early supporter. IMHO, the story should have been a core feature, and for a bit it sounded like it was going to be.

[–] brennesel@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 3 days ago

I can understand that very well. I've also been involved since the open alpha and was really looking forward to the story at first. But I also understand CSS's reasoning and have a lot of fun with the storyline / progress as it is.

[–] jerkface@lemmy.ca 0 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Meh. Disagree. Story is ancillary. I can recommend a number of books that will fully satisfy you but will not allow you to build a planet-hulling factory.

[–] FunnyUsername@lemmy.world 1 points 3 days ago

you disagreeing does not make me incorrect. that's how opinions work.

thanks for sharing your opinion, but the existence of books does not excuse the lackluster story we got from satisfactory, imo.