this post was submitted on 15 Jul 2025
506 points (99.6% liked)
A Comm for Historymemes
3080 readers
1041 users here now
A place to share history memes!
Rules:
-
No sexism, racism, homophobia, transphobia, assorted bigotry, etc.
-
No fascism, atrocity denial, etc.
-
Tag NSFW pics as NSFW.
-
Follow all Lemmy.world rules.
Banner courtesy of @setsneedtofeed@lemmy.world
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
You can't stack up your troops like in video games, so that wouldn't work. If the attackers were concentrating on the left side, then the defenders could breach the right side and encircle the attacking army.
Also keep in mind - you pretty much can't command your troops during the battle. Once the battle is unleashed, only chaos remains. You can only try to predict the flow of the battle and position your troops accordingly and prepare the early-stage orders.
Vaguely, but definitely not in a 1:1 manner like on the dance floor
The inability of commanding trots is why seasoned soldiers are so important. You can't train for eventualities but experience soldiers recognize what to do without direct leadership.
NCO-equivalents were also immensely important once it became apparent that low-mid level command could still be effectively exercised in the heat of battle. Roman centurions, for example, got paid 16x an enlisted man's salary by the time of the Early Empire precisely because it was recognized just how vital they were (and also because centurions took massive casualties and needed a bit of an inducement for anyone with a bit of brains in their skull to still want to stay in that front-line position)
Jules Ceasar would stand behind the formation during battle with troops that stayed in the back, and send them wherever the formation was about to fail.
I bet I'd still end up by myself with no one to fight, even if my side lost.