this post was submitted on 21 Jul 2025
1489 points (98.9% liked)

Science Memes

16062 readers
1012 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.



Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] MotoAsh@lemmy.world 41 points 1 week ago (3 children)

NOT "discovered inside black hole", just gained further theoretical evidence for the Earth being in a less dense area of the universe. There has been actual evidence of such for some time (at least a decade), but there is uncertainty at such large scales so it cannot be called conclusive based only on a couple types of observation that may have erroneous procedures.

[–] rozodru@lemmy.world 24 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (5 children)

so basically We're out in butt fuck no where in space and the aliens aren't coming any time soon cause they essentially live in New York City and we're in a town in Iowa that no one has ever heard of.

typical.

[–] WhiskyTangoFoxtrot@lemmy.world 15 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Far out in the uncharted backwaters of the unfashionable end of the western spiral arm of the galaxy.

[–] droans@midwest.social 6 points 1 week ago

Wait, we're the hicks?!

Actually, that explains so much.

[–] Zron@lemmy.world 12 points 1 week ago

It’s entirely possible that there are no aliens in the “New York City” part of the universe.

Dense regions of space will have much more interactions between stellar systems and may not be stable enough for life to evolve. It could be why we haven’t seen anyone else, they’re all in their own little pockets of peace.

[–] III@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago

Being from Iowa, I take offense to that... But yes, you are correct.

[–] SpikesOtherDog@ani.social 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] nomy@lemmy.zip 2 points 1 week ago

I've been here, I don't blame them for not stopping by.

[–] MotoAsh@lemmy.world 0 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Less dense as in ~20% less dense. It's absolutely nowhere near the population density difference of rural vs NYC, even assuming matter == chance for life, which simply is not the case, either.

[–] niktemadur@lemmy.world 6 points 1 week ago (1 children)

But then there's the guy who added all the mass and energy of the observable universe, calculated its' Schwarzschild Radius, and came up with 13.8 billion light years.

There's also how our observable universe's Hubble Horizon acts like a black hole event horizon, the way in which even the speed of light is insufficient to escape beyond.

A lot of the math inside a black hole is eerily similar to the math of our own horizon, as traced by the age of the universe plus the speed of light.

[–] MotoAsh@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

That is simply how horizons work. It's nothing magical about our universe. It's discussed in every astrophysics course worth its salt year one...

PBS Spacetime has many episodes on horizons and this very concept comes up a lot. It's also equally probable using such simple logic that we are in a white hole given the effects of dark energy, but the truth is they are very different sorts of horizons.

[–] deltapi@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Nah, there's been a bunch of discussion about our entire universe being inside a black hole.

https://lemmy.world/comment/18363823

[–] 0_o7@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

There being a "bunch of discussion" doesn't prove anything?

[–] deltapi@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago

I believe MotoAsh was talking about the local hole which is different from the more recent we're in a black hole discussion.

I was not stating that the unprovable is actually fact.

[–] MotoAsh@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

Nah, that discussion is MUCH older and including much of the "news" about it, is completely and utterly misinformed BS.