this post was submitted on 03 Aug 2025
427 points (86.6% liked)

Fuck AI

3770 readers
668 users here now

"We did it, Patrick! We made a technological breakthrough!"

A place for all those who loathe AI to discuss things, post articles, and ridicule the AI hype. Proud supporter of working people. And proud booer of SXSW 2024.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Source (Bluesky)

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] kopasz7@sh.itjust.works 85 points 2 weeks ago (42 children)

My issues are fundsmentally two fold with gen AI:

  1. Who owns and controls it (billionares and entrenched corporations)

  2. How it is shoehorned into everything (decision making processes, human-to-human communication, my coffee machine)

I cannot wait until finally the check is due and the AI bubble pops; folding this digital snake oil sellers' house of cards.

[–] iAmTheTot@sh.itjust.works 10 points 2 weeks ago (38 children)

You really take no issue with how they were all trained?

[–] baahb@lemmy.dbzer0.com -5 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

The way they were trained is the way they were trained.

I dont mean to say that the ethics dont matter, but you are talking as though this isnt already present tense.

The only way to go back is basically a global EMP.

What so you actually propose that is a realistic response?

This is an actual question. To this point the only advice I've seen to come from the anti-ai crowd is "dont use it. Its bad!" And that is simply not practical.

You all sound like the people who think we are actually able to get rid of guns entirely.

[–] iAmTheTot@sh.itjust.works 15 points 2 weeks ago

I'm not sure your "this is the present" argument holds much water with me. If someone stole my work and made billions off it, I'd want justice whether it was one day or one decade later.

I also don't think "this is the way it is, suck it up" is a good argument in general. Nothing would ever improve if everyone thought like that.

Also, not practical? I don't use genAI and I'm getting along just fine.

[–] queermunist@lemmy.ml 12 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Okay, you know those gigantic data centers that are being built that are using all our water and electricity?

Stop building them.

Seems easy.

[–] TrickDacy@lemmy.world -2 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Just like how not buying guns is easy. For the people who get it.

[–] queermunist@lemmy.ml 8 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Guns can be concealed and smuggled.

Compute warehouses the size of football fields that consume huge amounts of electricity and water absolutely can't. They can all be found extremely easily and shut down, and it would be extremely easy to prevent more from being built.

This isn't hard.

[–] TrickDacy@lemmy.world -1 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

It's a weird argument to say "we could just stop doing popular things". It shows a lack of awareness. And no, explaining this doesn't mean I'm taking sides I just recognize the current reality

[–] iAmTheTot@sh.itjust.works 3 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

The right thing isn't always popular. Something being popular is not itself a good argument for a thing to be done.

[–] TrickDacy@lemmy.world 1 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Why do you think I'm saying it's the right thing? I explicitly said I wasn't arguing for it. It's pretty obvious I'm just pointing out what the rich fucks will do. Wishing upon a star won't change it

[–] aesthelete@lemmy.world 0 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

There is an option of not doing a thing just because a rich fuck wants you to. It's mind-blowing, I know.

[–] TrickDacy@lemmy.world 2 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

What the fuck are you talking about? You idiots cannot fathom a world where you cannot accurately shovel words into strangers' mouths.

[–] aesthelete@lemmy.world 1 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

I'm talking about just because the rich fucks want you to use a thing, that doesn't mean you have to use the fucking thing.

Edit: But since in this case they lose money every time you use it maybe we should just automate using it as much as possible for useless shit on free accounts to speed the collapse.

[–] TrickDacy@lemmy.world 1 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Your implication seems to be I advocate for something I don't and it's dumb

[–] aesthelete@lemmy.world 1 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Whatever dude, it's a discussion of hypotheticals. Unless Sam Altman somehow involved himself in the chat, nobody here is influencing if any of this happens.

[–] TrickDacy@lemmy.world 1 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)
[–] aesthelete@lemmy.world 0 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

not really, you're all up and down the thread getting all excited about people discussing a hypothetical

unless the folks involved are extremely delusional, they already know that what they want has little to do with what will happen

[–] TrickDacy@lemmy.world 1 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I'm glad you know my point while I do not

[–] aesthelete@lemmy.world 2 points 2 weeks ago

you're a cranky one

[–] queermunist@lemmy.ml 1 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (2 children)

It's not "popular" organically, it's being forced on us by people who are invested in the technology. The chatbots are being shoved into everything because they want to make them profitable despite being money holes, not because people want it.

[–] WoodScientist@sh.itjust.works 1 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

And even if they do succeed in producing something useful. If you become dependent on a megacorp's AI to do your job, why shouldn't they charge you half your salary for the privilege?

[–] queermunist@lemmy.ml 2 points 2 weeks ago

That's what the boosters aren't talking about.

The chatbots are not profitable. They'll need to charge way more for usage at some point to actually make money; at some point investors are going to demand returns on their investments, and that's going to come out of user's pockets.

[–] TrickDacy@lemmy.world -1 points 2 weeks ago

Even more of a reason it won't happen. "All the capitalists have to do is stop caring about money". Yeah ok.

[–] petrol_sniff_king@lemmy.blahaj.zone 0 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Yeah, they shouldn't be popular. Tell all your friends.

[–] TrickDacy@lemmy.world 3 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Yes, fair, the existence of AI should be credited to my comments in this thread. The fact that some idiot stated on Lemmy that it's easy to stop AI though? Almost thwarted the entire operation. Next time!

New legislation: grants and licenses for server farms for such and such purposes will no longer be accepted.

Easy? Yes. As easy as eating a bag of doritos? What, do you think I'm stupid?

[–] aesthelete@lemmy.world 8 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

To this point the only advice I’ve seen to come from the anti-ai crowd is “dont use it. Its bad!” And that is simply not practical.

I'd argue it's not practical to use it.

[–] baahb@lemmy.dbzer0.com -3 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

Your argument is invalid, the capitalists are making money. It will continue for as long as there is money to be made. Your agreement and my agreement is unnecessary.

How do we fix the problem that makes AI something that we have to deal with.

[–] petrol_sniff_king@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Sabotage, public outrage, I dunno.

If you're arguing that people shouldn't be upset because there's no escaping it, this is an argument in favor of capitalism. Capitalism can't be escaped either.

[–] baahb@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I appreciate you taking my question a face value, you're the only one who did. Your capitalism quote worked perfectly. I was trying to use guns as my exams of shit I can't get away from.

[–] petrol_sniff_king@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I guess. I'm still anti-capitalism, though, but in the plant a fig tree for your grandchildren kind of sense.

[–] baahb@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Right, like how to end capitalism? I got very little, but I'm planting gardens, and not complaining that capitalism exists on /C/fuckcapitalism.

[–] petrol_sniff_king@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

Lemmy is like the place to complain about capitalism. There are more of these fuckers here than anywhere else.

And, there is, if nothing else, value in taking public sentiment away from people who actually do really, really like capitalism. The deregulation types who would cream their pants if the FDA/USDA were barred from inspecting your food to make sure it won't poison you before you buy it.

[–] aesthelete@lemmy.world 0 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

... the capitalists are making money. It will continue for as long as there is money to be made.

Nah these companies don't even make money on the whole, they burn money. So your argument is invalid, and may God have mercy on your soul! 🙏

[–] TrickDacy@lemmy.world 0 points 2 weeks ago
load more comments (34 replies)
load more comments (37 replies)