this post was submitted on 17 Aug 2023
512 points (96.2% liked)

News

28928 readers
4499 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

“This was not reckless driving. This was murder,” the judge said before she read out Mackenzie Shirilla's verdict Monday afternoon.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Swedneck@discuss.tchncs.de 46 points 2 years ago (18 children)

Remind me why we allow teenagers to drive 3-ton vehicles again?

[–] kozy138@lemm.ee 67 points 2 years ago

"Gotta get them teens to work. And no public transit options please, they make my money pile smaller."

-CEO's everywhere

[–] OrnateLuna@lemmy.blahaj.zone 45 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Why do we allow most people to drive 3 ton vehicles

[–] thepianistfroggollum@lemmynsfw.com 0 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Right? I honestly can't wait until self driving cars take up enough of the market share that manual driving cars will be outlawed (or at least getting insurance on them will be astronomically expensive)

[–] oddityoverseer@lemmy.world 25 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Or public transit improves, actually freeing up space on the road

[–] CoderKat@lemm.ee 3 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

What dumb is that we can improve public transit today. Unlike self driving cars, there is no technological barrier. The only thing stopping us from improving public transit is that fact that humans (especially in North America) are selfish, greedy, easily manipulated, and apathetic.

Public transit doesn't improve because not enough people don't want to use public transit and not enough people want to use public transit because it doesn't improve.

[–] Mr_Blott@feddit.uk 28 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Remind the rest of us why anycunt needs a 3 ton personal vehicle again?

[–] dragoness@lemmy.zip 8 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

At risk of angering the vast majority of the fuck cars community, it's generally because I live 30 minutes from my job by highway, and can't afford to live within walking distance. And they won't let us telework. I really really want to actually live close enough to bike.

[–] kandoh@reddthat.com 7 points 2 years ago (1 children)

So we have a large reoccurring expense that forces us to always have a job and stay productive in a modern society where this really isn't necessary?

[–] Mr_Blott@feddit.uk 5 points 2 years ago

I'll stick with my 1.2l, 50mpg shitbox thanks

[–] krayj@sh.itjust.works 19 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

Because the vast majority of them don't use the 3ton vehicle to commit murder.

You do know that adults use vehicles as murder weapons also, yeah?

[–] _wintermute@lemmy.world 16 points 2 years ago

The same reason we all have a personal 3 ton vehicle: to ensure we remain bound to a culture of sprawling roads and fossil fuel consumption.

So they can be exploited for cheep labor.

[–] The_Mixer_Dude@lemmus.org 10 points 2 years ago

When I think back to how immature and reckless I was as a teenager I can't believe I was legally allowed to drive and considered a full grown adult at the age of 18.

[–] afraid_of_zombies@lemmy.world 8 points 2 years ago

Remind me why we allow banks to control our economy again?

[–] elbarto777@lemmy.world 5 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Awesome. Judge all teenagers because of a deranged one.

What's your stance on 27 year olds with driver's licenses?

[–] Swedneck@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Yeah buddy i'm going to judge all drivers, because i kinda sorta vaguely don't want me or others to die!

Are you against gun control too?

[–] elbarto777@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I'm not, but it seems like you are, correct?

[–] Swedneck@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 2 years ago

Why would i be against gun control? I also enjoy not randomly having my brains blown out.

[–] cazsiel@lemmy.world 4 points 2 years ago

tbp the camry she drove was closer to 1.5 tons

[–] MyTurtleSwimsUpsideDown@kbin.social 2 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

So they can be exploited for cheap labor.

[–] acutfjg@feddit.nl 3 points 2 years ago

You're not wrong. Being able to drive by 16 so that you can start working is the capitalist way.

[–] sulfate7016@lemm.ee 2 points 2 years ago

A Camry weighs half of that, and regardless, she could have done this in any vehicle

[–] Evil_Shrubbery@lemm.ee 1 points 5 months ago

Bcs we lack the infrastructure for them not to require a car & obviously want car companies, roadworks, and petrol industries to continue having huge profits.

[–] rab@lemmy.ca 0 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Lol which vehicles weigh 3 tons. Aside from EVs. You mean 3 tons as in 6600 lbs right?

[–] Copernican@lemmy.world -5 points 2 years ago (2 children)
[–] elbarto777@lemmy.world 14 points 2 years ago

She was 17. But I understand your point.

[–] Swedneck@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Legally sure, still immature and not someone who should be piloting a heavy vehicle capable of going 100 mph.

Most people aren't, frankly.

[–] Riven@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 2 years ago

You're right and car rental companies agree with you as most of them won't rent to anyone under 25.