this post was submitted on 09 Oct 2025
809 points (94.8% liked)

Humor

8824 readers
137 users here now

"Laugh-a-Palooza: Unleash Your Inner Chuckle!"

Rules


Read Full Rules Here!


Rule 1: Keep it light-hearted. This community is dedicated to humor and laughter, so let’s keep the tone light and positive.


Rule 2: Respectful Engagement. Keep it civil!


Rule 3: No spamming! AI slop will be considered spam at the discretion of moderators


Rule 4: No explicit or NSFW content.


Rule 5: Stay on topic. Keep your posts relevant to humor-related topics.


Rule 6: Moderators Discretion. The moderators retain the right to remove any content, ban users/bots if deemed necessary.


Please report any violation of rules!


Warning: Strict compliance with all the rules is imperative. Failure to read and adhere to them will not be tolerated. Violations may result in immediate removal of your content and a permanent ban from the community.


We retain the discretion to modify the rules as we deem necessary.


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] turdcollector69@lemmy.world 70 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (66 children)

"Gifted" programs are so fucked up.

They separate kids out for being "smart", put them on a pedestal, endlessly gas them up with wildly unrealistic expectations and then only teach them how to be good students at the expense of all social development.

All these kids go into the world thinking that being good at math or memorization is 95% of what it takes to be successful when in reality it's like 10% intellect and 90% social ability.

The worst part is that these kids usually aren't even extra smart, they just have more involved parents.

It always ends up that the kid with infinite potential lives up to none of it and has a massive ego complex because they got gaslit into believing their parents pipedreams were realistic and that it's their fault for not living up to them.

Edit: It's really funny all the former gifted kids are taking this as a personal attack.

[–] MyBrainHurts@piefed.ca 14 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (25 children)

Ehhh, to each their own. I was in those classes, fully separated streams. No idea why you'd assume having a more interesting class would nix social development. (You can't learn to socialize if the teacher doesn't have to slow down?)

Fully wide range of outcomes but a lot of the kids with the potential went and realized it. Sure, not all of us did but from my small circle one's on the second highest court in Canada, one's set up a reasonably famous company, one's a cardiac surgeon etc.

[–] turdcollector69@lemmy.world -4 points 1 week ago (15 children)

I'm talking about school in the US, I'm not sure how Canadian schools are structured.

In my school, they pulled all the "smart" kids(most just had parents who did 90% of the work) out of normal classes, gave them 2-3x the workload and moved the coursework up by half a grade.

I'm sure there are better programs but widely that's how things were for American gifted students.

Many of the people I knew in those programs either turned out average or did extremely poorly because they had a massive ego with no social skills.

It's to the point where I feel like the people who became successful were successful in spite of the gifted program and the people who turned out to be failures did so because of the gifted program.

It will be different in different places but this has been my experience in the US.

load more comments (14 replies)
load more comments (23 replies)
load more comments (63 replies)