this post was submitted on 18 Oct 2025
424 points (99.5% liked)

politics

26116 readers
2693 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Top White House officials told a reporter, “Your mom,” when asked who picked the location for Donald Trump’s upcoming meeting with Vladimir Putin.

Trump announced Thursday that he will soon meet with Putin in Budapest, Hungary, to discuss an end to the war in Ukraine. The choice has raised questions, because Putin is wanted by the International Criminal Court. However, Hungary appears unlikely to cooperate with the warrant and is in the process of leaving the court, the Associated Press reports.

When HuffPost asked the White House who chose the location for the meeting, White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt replied, “Your mom did.” White House Communications Director Steven Cheung also followed up with, “Your mom,” the outlet reports.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] pulsewidth@lemmy.world 6 points 2 days ago (1 children)

They have, but you can't expect journalists to not ask the administration questions. It is literally their job.

[–] Corkyskog@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (2 children)

There are tons of people in the white house they could call on or off the record. There is no reason to listen to Leavitts propaganda report on the regular. I am surprised they cover her as much as they do, I literally tune her out now because I know everything she says is a lie. Steven Miller is a ghoul, but even he is more honest about what they are doing... whether on purpose or Freudian slips...

[–] pulsewidth@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

She is the White House Press Secretary. She is literally the primary interface between the Whitehouse and the press, and you're arguing the press should not ask her questions and report on her statements?

This blaming the journalists for reporting what the White House Press Secretary says is really backwards.

[–] Corkyskog@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

She certainly doesn't act like it.

If she had any modicum of honesty then that position would actually matter. It's like asking AI that has been trained to specifically avoid everyone's question, what's the point? I can predict her responses to every question with like over 90% accuracy, and when I am wrong it's because her response is a bizarre troll response like "your mom"

Hell even Trump is more honest than her, if for no other reason than his dementia.

[–] jerkface@lemmy.ca 3 points 2 days ago (1 children)

It's their job to get the shitty things they say on the record. That is important, too. I know it doesn't make anyone feel good but it still has to be done.

[–] Corkyskog@sh.itjust.works 0 points 2 days ago

Reuters will be there, just get it from them if you need it.