this post was submitted on 20 Oct 2025
-51 points (27.4% liked)

Unpopular Opinion

8088 readers
133 users here now

Welcome to the Unpopular Opinion community!


How voting works:

Vote the opposite of the norm.


If you agree that the opinion is unpopular give it an arrow up. If it's something that's widely accepted, give it an arrow down.



Guidelines:

Tag your post, if possible (not required)


  • If your post is a "General" unpopular opinion, start the subject with [GENERAL].
  • If it is a Lemmy-specific unpopular opinion, start it with [LEMMY].


Rules:

1. NO POLITICS


Politics is everywhere. Let's make this about [general] and [lemmy] - specific topics, and keep politics out of it.


2. Be civil.


Disagreements happen, but that doesn’t provide the right to personally attack others. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Please also refrain from gatekeeping others' opinions.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Shitposts and memes are allowed but...


Only until they prove to be a problem. They can and will be removed at moderator discretion.


5. No trolling.


This shouldn't need an explanation. If your post or comment is made just to get a rise with no real value, it will be removed. You do this too often, you will get a vacation to touch grass, away from this community for 1 or more days. Repeat offenses will result in a perma-ban.


6. Defend your opinion


This is a bit of a mix of rules 4 and 5 to help foster higher quality posts. You are expected to defend your unpopular opinion in the post body. We don't expect a whole manifesto (please, no manifestos), but you should at least provide some details as to why you hold the position you do.



Instance-wide rules always apply. https://legal.lemmy.world/tos/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I'm not including the government in this because they actually do intentionally cause suffering and just so happen to be rich by stealing all your tax payer dollars.

Both parties do this. (I had to give that disclaimer, now to my opinion)

I saw a post that said "eat the rich", I still think it's kind of funny, but only because how stupid it is. Like how is fighting the rich (regular people with money) going to fix your problem (regular people without money)? It won't.

I'm not sure if it's just a trend online or because people are angrier due to more stress from bills, yada yada. (Feel free to school me on this part)

I do know that if you picked 1000 rich people and weighed their usefulness and positive impact on society it would outweigh 100,000 nonrich people.

For instance rich people make businesses that hire people, those people can work. Good (if that's what you care about)

Rich people get inventions produced and do research and development. Now you're using technology some rich person created. They may not have even been rich before they created it. Getting wealth may have been a side effect of their success. Do you still "eat the rich"?

It's foolish and clearly bitterness. I know you have evil demons like Gates running around who happens to be rich AND villainous. However I've seen many evil and unwealthy people. Basically I think you all need to look at things with a clearer lense and stop hating and try to build wealth or at least freedom from needing wealth.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Valmond@lemmy.world 22 points 4 days ago (1 children)

The fallacy that people "make work" is so ingrained in our societies. Yep, i get up in the morning and "build" a "work" for someone to work in. Sure buddy.

What happens is that a) in a specific place, there is a demand, say for example for shoes, and someone with the money and education starts a shoe shop there. Now he can hire someone doing the grunt work.

The smart business guy can try to open 1.000 shoe shops in spaces where there are no demand and despite how early ge gets up in the morning and how hard he works they will all fail (and hire no one in the end).

They're investors, they open that shoe shop, knowing the risk (because they learned how to assess a businessplan in business school), and because they open several, the risk is mitigated (if one shop doesn't "work out" just fire the workers and close it, putting the cost on the other shops).

This is classic business, and you can even have a go at it yourself (at big risks as you can probably only open one shop yourself, but you can, maybe).

A sidenote about Eat the rich, they are not business investors, they bought up the country, the government, law and order, they are breaking the social contract and even the contract of how money works, that's why it's not just important but for our own survival that we must "eat the rich".