this post was submitted on 22 Oct 2025
87 points (94.8% liked)
Open Source
41646 readers
230 users here now
All about open source! Feel free to ask questions, and share news, and interesting stuff!
Useful Links
- Open Source Initiative
- Free Software Foundation
- Electronic Frontier Foundation
- Software Freedom Conservancy
- It's FOSS
- Android FOSS Apps Megathread
Rules
- Posts must be relevant to the open source ideology
- No NSFW content
- No hate speech, bigotry, etc
Related Communities
- !libre_culture@lemmy.ml
- !libre_software@lemmy.ml
- !libre_hardware@lemmy.ml
- !linux@lemmy.ml
- !technology@lemmy.ml
Community icon from opensource.org, but we are not affiliated with them.
founded 6 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
"Europe... the guys that want backdoor into all encrypted communications" is a weird thing to say considering that every attempt of such a law failed because they didn't have the majority.
"Europe.... where a minority of politicians have continually failled to get a backdoor into all encrypted communications" would be far more accurate.
The rejection of the bill wasn’t on principle, but technicalities, the bill will be back with edits, Denmark is already aiming for December
Oh interesting, technicalities like? I wrote to a bunch of politicians and I was assured that they rejected it on principle.
Maybe they lied to me. But why would they lie to me but not the general public? Maybe the EU is a bunch of politicians and they all have their own opinions.
Depends on the country, of course there were politicians that disagreed on principle, but the voting on the issue wasn’t done by MEPs , if it’s MEPs you messaged