this post was submitted on 26 Oct 2025
1099 points (98.2% liked)

Science Memes

17204 readers
2067 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.



Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] NeatNit@discuss.tchncs.de 91 points 1 day ago (3 children)

There are various systems of units where select physical constants are set to 1. A handy comparison chart is on Wikipedia: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Natural_units?wprov=sfla1

It turns out you can't harmonize all the physical constants. Some will necessarily end up as some non-round number.

Most of them have speed of light = 1, but some have it as 1/α where α is the fine-structure constant (α = e² / 4πε₀ħc ≈ 0.007297)

[–] zakobjoa@lemmy.world 61 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I understand nothing I've just read but I'm glad you science folk have fun and funding.

[–] peoplebeproblems@midwest.social 43 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Fun yes.

Funding? What's that?

[–] Kornblumenratte@feddit.org 8 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Come on, you are able to analize words! Fun is obviously fun, and ding is obviously an abbreviation for dingbats, so fun-ding is having fun with dingbats!

[–] NeatNit@discuss.tchncs.de 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Come on, you are able to analize words!

No, you can't. Believe me, I've tried. I did everything I could to analyze this topic. There are many things that are possible to analize. Many household items. But not words.

[–] uselessartifact@lemmy.zip 1 points 19 hours ago

That sounds like something out of a Douglas Adams book.

[–] gandalf_der_12te@discuss.tchncs.de 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

IMO it might be better to only look at natural units that don't depend on the specific properties of matter (i.e. proton mass, electron charge, ...)

arguably, there could be an alien civilization in our universe that is purely made of exotic matter somewhere really far away, we simply haven't found it yet. It's purely made of exons and kaions and yppsons and particles that don't exist on earth, where an exon has a positive charge of 1.456... proton charges and an yppson has a negative charge of -4.132... proton charges and so on.

therefore i consider physical constants such as ħ and c and G more fundamental than e and such, because those numbers would be the same even for exotic matter, i claim.

then, is that reduced set of natural constants harmonizable?

[–] NeatNit@discuss.tchncs.de 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

A quick glance at the summary table can answer that. Planck units seem to do the trick.

They call him Maxxie! Maxxie! Faster than lightning. No one you see / is measureier than he!

[–] JoeBigelow@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 day ago

I like the Stoney Units, I feel appreciated.