this post was submitted on 26 Oct 2025
1083 points (98.3% liked)

Science Memes

17204 readers
2165 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.



Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Uruanna@lemmy.world 21 points 1 day ago* (last edited 58 minutes ago) (1 children)

Every base is base 10 dumdum

0, 1, 2, 10, 11, 12, 20, 21...

e: starting at 0 to not shame programmers.

[–] TheDoozer@lemmy.world 12 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

That's true. It should really be referenced by the number before 10 (e.g. Base 9 for 0-1-2-3-4-5-6-7-8-9-10).

[–] merc@sh.itjust.works 3 points 4 hours ago

IMO it should be called "base 9+1". It is a "base 10" system because each order of magnitude is 10x as big as the previous one. But, the key thing is to know which digit is the last one before you roll over.

[–] scrollo@lemmy.world 9 points 1 day ago

Woah, I had never considered that. To think, all these years I was on the side of "initial index is 1." I've unknowingly been using "initial index is 0," since I started using numbers.

oh-my-god-i-get-it-now.jpeg