this post was submitted on 25 Oct 2025
132 points (85.5% liked)

News

32953 readers
2958 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] TempermentalAnomaly@lemmy.world 6 points 3 days ago (3 children)

I don't disagree with you, but I feel like people jump to that scenario without describing the steps to get there. How do you see unfolding? How do different opposition groups respond such as the DNC? What about blue states? How does the administration handle it without losing popular consensus? Does it even matter? If they use the military, how do they get the military stay the path when the populous begins to reject their intervention?

[–] edible_funk@lemmy.world 7 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Trump is sending "election observers" to California because of prop 50 and to New York because of Mamdani. It's reasonable to be very concerned about future election integrity. ICE has a larger budget than the Marines. They've openly ignored courts. They have fully abandoned the rule of law.

[–] TempermentalAnomaly@lemmy.world -2 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Like I said, I don't disagree that this is a possibility, but I'm curious how people see it unfolding. I like to leverage other minds to develop my thinking.

[–] JackbyDev@programming.dev 2 points 2 days ago (1 children)

They just told you how they see it unfolding though.

The only thing they said was they are sending election observers. How does that answer any of the very valid questions I asked?

[–] humorlessrepost@lemmy.world 7 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

How do you see unfolding?

Martial law to respond to ice agents being killed or police turning against them.

They’re already trying to instigate this.

How do different opposition groups respond such as the DNC?

“The Supreme Court says it’s ok, so our hands are tied, but we’re very upset.”

They already have the Supreme Court on their team.

What about blue states?

Governors will either roll over or start a hot civil war.

Which do you think they’ll choose?

How does the administration handle it without losing popular consensus?

By arresting and murdering protesters.

They’ve already identified vague groups like antifa as domestic terrorists.

If they use the military, how do they get the military stay the path when the populous begins to reject their intervention?

If you give ICE a large enough budget, they can act as a new military. And by firing non-loyal brass for not being able to do enough pushups and replacing them with loyalists, you can keep the military from intervening under the guise of neutrality.

The Courts are, as you noted, already in line with or an ineffective hedge against the administration. I think there are other opposition groups. I suspect there are more than a few in the military who are willing to resist. Discounting military leaders has been the downfall of many rebellions.

Replacing personelle isn't as easy as just putting someone loyal into the position. Execution requires competency and the counter elites don't have experience to run things effectively save a few notable exceptions. They seem best suited to posturing, making grand proclamations, and breaking things. This is fine when you're trying to destroy the old order, but building one is a lot harder.

By arresting and murdering protesters.

I'm skeptical they can do this en mass without emboldening resistance at first. Your need a well staffed group of people to deal with this in hundreds of sites and willing to kill people. For everything the MAGA movement has done, they've never given a positivist vision for the future. Which is to say, what future are we creating that makes it worth killing people.

None of my critiques should be read as they can't do it. Rather, these are strategic points at which interference could undermine their efforts.

As for blue states, I think most will gesture towards being offended greatly, but fail to create an effective opposition. I do think a couple will attempt a hot resistance. And if, say, a Pacific front opens, this could be difficult to deal with. Furthermore, pockets of resistence within red states will be very, very difficult to stamp out. Our large geography makes it very difficult to command and control.

I don't think ICE, even as well funded as they are, have the trained pedosnelle or institutions to replicate anything like a military force. Hell, out military isn't even well designed to be an effective occupation force.

[–] veni_vedi_veni@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

While the whole world is focused on Epstein files, thinking it's going to be his downfall (why would it?), he's replacing the leaders of many institutions with yes men, that emergency meeting Hegseth had calling in all the military generals should honestly be the most alarming thing in recent US history, and yet we aren't even a quarter of the way through his term.

Kinda hard not to be alarmist