this post was submitted on 29 Oct 2025
101 points (98.1% liked)

Technology

40604 readers
169 users here now

A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.

Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] themurphy@lemmy.ml 31 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Their biggest and saddest win, is making truth debatable.

[–] GorGor@startrek.website 22 points 1 day ago (2 children)
[–] Someonelol@lemmy.dbzer0.com 15 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Holy shit. They claim Einstein's Theory of Relativity has something to do with moral relativism? That's so fucking stupid.

[–] Bronzebeard@lemmy.zip 4 points 1 day ago

But you see, they share the same word, so must be similar. Big smart. Much literate.

[–] irotsoma@piefed.blahaj.zone 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Yeah, but this will not require any people to add content since it's all stollen and simply manipulated which is easier to automate than producing original content which AI can't be trusted not to hallucinate about quite yet. The idea is to then get the search engine AIs to point there as much as possible as it will likely be optimized for AI scraping rather than human browsing. Then since the AI results are prioritized more and more, they can get their truthiness to be what people see over actual reality.

[–] GorGor@startrek.website 2 points 1 day ago

yeah, the back end is the scarier part. I don't think conservapedia actually added that much content, it just copied Wikipedia and edited the parts they cared about. Automating that, while helpful, isn't that big a deal IMO. Disseminating the resultant bullshit (with a hint of plausibility) is where the nightmares begin.

[–] tias@discuss.tchncs.de 7 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] jansk@beehaw.org 2 points 1 day ago

I wish Sagan were still here. We could all use his guidance