this post was submitted on 30 Oct 2025
85 points (96.7% liked)

Anime

3564 readers
121 users here now

This community is the place to discuss and ask questions about anime, anime news, and related topics.

Currently airing show discussion threads are created by our resident bot, rikka@ani.social. If it doesn't make a thread for an episode that you want to discuss, see the user guide on the wiki for instructions on how to ask rikka to make a thread for you to use.

Check out our wiki to find:

Rules

More complete rules on the wiki.

Post Tags

Post tags are completely optional, but some recommended tags would include:

Related General Communities

Discord

Thanks to @NineSwords@ani.social for running the discord!


rikka

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] mo_lave@reddthat.com 8 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Crunchyroll on their previous way of subtitling:

Customer on Crunchyroll's new way of subtitling:

It's one more consequence of the current copyright regime being self-servingly catered to business owners. I don't have a solution to this without either (a) exposing yourself to ruin or (b) consciously killing your interest in any commercial creative medium.

It's unlikely you can "save Crunchyroll from itself". It's better for your peace of mind to leave them be and do not participate. They're confident as the "only source of legal consumption of anime" in many places that they do not have the incentive to... ironically... be more creative (which copyright claims to incentivize). It was good while it lasted.

[–] NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io 9 points 1 day ago (1 children)

It's one more consequence of ~~the current~~ copyright ~~regime~~ being self-servingly catered to business owners.

Copyright was invented by Brits and spread worldwide by Americans; if it didn't cater to business owners they wouldn't have done it.

I don't have a solution to this without either (a) exposing yourself to ruin or (b) consciously killing your interest in any commercial creative medium.

Or (c) piracy.

[–] mo_lave@reddthat.com 1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

Copyright was invented by Brits and spread worldwide by Americans; if it didn’t cater to business owners they wouldn’t have done it.

I have the emphasis on "current" because of exclusive licensing and the lengthening of copyright terms before lapsing to public domain.

Or © piracy.

That's potentially exposing yourself to financial ruin (see: Nintendo)

[–] shani66@ani.social 9 points 1 day ago

Piracy can be pretty safe if you have the first idea what you're doing.

[–] NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io 6 points 1 day ago (1 children)

If you're really worried, streaming copyrighted content is legal in most of the world, but really the only risk involved is when torrenting (and even then only in certain cases), in which case just use a VPN*. In other words, it's not a crime if you never get caught.

*Courts don't magically know when you're pirating; the bottleneck is that the IP holder has to somehow catch you up/downloading unlicenced content and know your IP address. This is impossible for normal downloading and only possible if you're torrenting and the IP holder is seeding in order to catch IP theft, and even then a VPN obfuscates your IP address, making this a moot point.

[–] mo_lave@reddthat.com 3 points 1 day ago

That it's illegal/a crime in the books to begin with is a problem. Even more so if the punishment is disproportionate to the damages an owner can claim. There's a reason for that: the current copyright implementation is the closest thing to an infinite money glitch in real life.