this post was submitted on 24 Aug 2023
295 points (93.3% liked)

Fuck Cars

10128 readers
1 users here now

This community exists as a sister community/copycat community to the r/fuckcars subreddit.

This community exists for the following reasons:

You can find the Matrix chat room for this community here.

Rules

  1. Be nice to each other. Being aggressive or inflammatory towards other users will get you banned. Name calling or obvious trolling falls under that. Hate cars, hate the system, but not people. While some drivers definitely deserve some hate, most of them didn't choose car-centric life out of free will.

  2. No bigotry or hate. Racism, transphobia, misogyny, ableism, homophobia, chauvinism, fat-shaming, body-shaming, stigmatization of people experiencing homeless or substance users, etc. are not tolerated. Don't use slurs. You can laugh at someone's fragile masculinity without associating it with their body. The correlation between car-culture and body weight is not an excuse for fat-shaming.

  3. Stay on-topic. Submissions should be on-topic to the externalities of car culture in urban development and communities globally. Posting about alternatives to cars and car culture is fine. Don't post literal car fucking.

  4. No traffic violence. Do not post depictions of traffic violence. NSFW or NSFL posts are not allowed. Gawking at crashes is not allowed. Be respectful to people who are a victim of traffic violence or otherwise traumatized by it. News articles about crashes and statistics about traffic violence are allowed. Glorifying traffic violence will get you banned.

  5. No reposts. Before sharing, check if your post isn't a repost. Reposts that add something new are fine. Reposts that are sharing content from somewhere else are fine too.

  6. No misinformation. Masks and vaccines save lives during a pandemic, climate change is real and anthropogenic - and denial of these and other established facts will get you banned. False or highly speculative titles will get your post deleted.

  7. No harassment. Posts that (may) cause harassment, dogpiling or brigading, intentionally or not, will be removed. Please do not post screenshots containing uncensored usernames. Actual harassment, dogpiling or brigading is a bannable offence.

Please report posts and comments that violate our rules.

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] GBU_28@lemm.ee 5 points 2 years ago (45 children)

I can't get behind property seizure without compensation, but I can understand everything else.

Even if they said "you can't have this car any more, but can sell it from our facility" that'd be better I think

[–] TDCN 28 points 2 years ago (19 children)

Normally me neither, bit in this context where you are driving so recklessly you are endangering everyone else and we are talking over double the speed limit I'll allow it. Noone has any rights left when you are doing that kind of stuff deliberately.

[–] AGTMADCAT@infosec.exchange 1 points 2 years ago

@TDCN @GBU_28 In a country like Denmark where it's unlikely that having a car vs. not is the difference between living indoors and dying on the street I can see this working okay. I don't think it would translate well to a country like the US where as well as killing the poor generally it would also be heavily exploited by the police to kill minorities.

I hope in Denmark there's a very high standard of evidence which the police have to present so they can't just lie about the speeds they observe?

load more comments (18 replies)
[–] threedaymonk@discuss.tchncs.de 7 points 2 years ago (1 children)

In effect, is it really that different to a fine? It seems to have a couple of advantages, though: it's easier to collect, and it's proportional, so a person who can afford a fancy luxury car pays more than someone in an old banger, without the complexity of having to evaluate their income and savings.

[–] TDCN 32 points 2 years ago (2 children)

This is exactly the reason they are doing it. Proportional to income and the car is completely and physically removed from the road. There was a big issue here where the offender would just drive without license or the car was leased or borrowed so there was no real penalty. Now the leasing company would have to take responsibility for leasing fancy supercars to anyone and everyone and people lending their car to a known drunk or fast driver would definitely think twice.

[–] joland@sfba.social 3 points 2 years ago (6 children)

@TDCN

That part is all good. The problem is they don't care whose car it is. If I was to borrow your car, and then break this law, then YOU are out a car. Yes, you can try and get the money back from me, but that might take a decade if I don't have money to replace your car.
If you ask me, that's crazy.

[–] TDCN 14 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Well I agree it might be a bit crazy, but I also must admit that I like the law because it works and it makes it such that I don't want to lend my car out to anyone unless I know for sure how they drive by driving with them a few times. It puts the responsibility into the hands of the car owner. Just replace the word car with gun and it all sounds reasonable. If I just lend my gun to a friend who I only know very little or I have never seen hold a gun in his hand that would be very bad. Even if he has a license for guns. And if he shot someone or broke the law in other ways with the gun I'd only expect the gun to be confiscated regardless of who owns it.

[–] amszmidt@mastodon.social 2 points 2 years ago (1 children)

@TDCN @joland replacing car with gun or riffle makes it even more absurd. You saying that if I lend a riffle to someone on a hunt, I should bear the consequences for their actions if they miss and hit something? Thankfully the law in rest of Scandinavia isn’t as insane…

[–] TDCN 5 points 2 years ago (1 children)

There's a significant difference between an accident and deliberately being wrekless

[–] amszmidt@mastodon.social 2 points 2 years ago (1 children)

@TDCN There is nothing about being “wreckless” when borrowing something to someone else. If person has a valid driving license that is all that matters. We ain’t even taking about lending a car to a obviously drunk idiot which is punishable.

[–] TDCN 2 points 2 years ago (1 children)

But the law will definitely make me think twice before lending my car to anyone.

[–] amszmidt@mastodon.social 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

@TDCN And it is outright harmful to the environment, car pooling is a thing.

[–] TDCN 4 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Yes carpooling is a thing but this law literally has nothing to do with this so I don't get your point.

[–] amszmidt@mastodon.social 1 points 2 years ago (12 children)

@TDCN Your literally lending a car. And if you lend it to some idiot, you have no car.

[–] TDCN 4 points 2 years ago (3 children)

Exactly. Don't lend your car to an idiot. It's your car so also your responsibility. Keep it safe.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (11 replies)
[–] sheean@hachyderm.io 2 points 2 years ago (2 children)

@TDCN @joland here in the Netherlands the fine for a traffic violation is already up to the owner to sort out. They don’t give AF who drove the car. Your car. Your responsibility. Your problem.

[–] TDCN 2 points 2 years ago

I like that actually

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] DavidPenington@mastodon.au 2 points 2 years ago

@joland @TDCN it's the same as if you crash a borrowed car while doing something that invalidates the insurance, eg racing.

[–] falcon@mastodon.social 1 points 2 years ago

@joland @TDCN I think it’s good. Don’t lend your car to friends that you know don’t respect the law

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] sldrant@mastodon.social 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)
[–] mhgottlieb@mastodon.social 1 points 2 years ago (4 children)

@sldrant @TDCN @threedaymonk yes. Stolen cars are returned to the owner, not confiscated.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] jessta@aus.social 2 points 2 years ago (4 children)

@GBU_28 @TDCN In Australia we have a law that lets the police make you watch while they crush your car.

[–] nbartlett@mastodonapp.uk 1 points 2 years ago

@jessta @GBU_28 @TDCN That's amazing but how do they *make* you watch?

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] nj_kruse@mstdn.dk 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

@GBU_28 @TDCN
If leasing companies face no loss, they can continue to lease supercars to morons.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] jaycee@toot.community 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

@TDCN @GBU_28 no! If you know the consequences beforehand, not a problem!! As the old saying goes, if you can’t serve the time, don’t do the crime.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Crisps@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago

As long as it then goes swiftly through the court system to confirm this. Otherwise it is theft, like US asset forfeiture.

[–] mwfc@chaos.social 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

@GBU_28
We often have the discussion whether it is an instrument for murder.
So going insanely fast, often within city limits, is considered in comparison to planned homocide.

So why should they hand out the potential weapon, just because you missed someone?

Furthermore we have issues of companies renting out overly powerful cars, so some tourists can go crazy on our autobahn in a Ferrari.
IMHO this business model is insane and this is a valid way to stop it.

Would love this in De.

@TDCN

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] HydrePrever@mathstodon.xyz 1 points 2 years ago

@GBU_28 @TDCN the compensation is "not getting a life sentence", I think it's very fair

[–] kelvin0mql@mastodon.hams.social 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (35 replies)