this post was submitted on 28 Oct 2023
526 points (93.8% liked)

Technology

71143 readers
3781 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
L3s@lemmy.world
enu@lemmy.world
technopagan@lemmy.world
L4s@lemmy.world
L3s@hackingne.ws
L4s@hackingne.ws
526
X adds video calling — and lets strangers ring you: Turned on by default, tool lets anyone you follow potentially call you up (www.independent.co.uk)
submitted 2 years ago by L4s@lemmy.world to c/technology@lemmy.world
65 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

X adds video calling — and lets strangers ring you: Turned on by default, tool lets anyone you follow potentially call you up::Turned on by default, tool lets anyone you follow potentially call you up

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] jcg@halubilo.social 14 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I think the problem here is there's no prior consent. If you've DM'd someone in the past, they can now call you. Twitter never had video call before, and the people who use it never expected to be giving consent for a video call maybe even several years later.

[–] crashoverride@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Why did we go from the more descriptive "private message (PM) to direct (DM)like why replace it? Anyone know?

[–] MrScottyTay@sh.itjust.works 3 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Because of the implication it's not actually private, since admins can see it and/or it's used for analytics.

[–] crashoverride@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago (2 children)

It's still private for the purposes that other users can't see it.

[–] Zoot@reddthat.com 1 points 2 years ago

Yeah, however the term is disingenuous.

[–] RazorsLedge@lemmy.world 0 points 2 years ago

But still not actually private