this post was submitted on 05 Nov 2023
813 points (97.4% liked)

Not The Onion

16355 readers
777 users here now

Welcome

We're not The Onion! Not affiliated with them in any way! Not operated by them in any way! All the news here is real!

The Rules

Posts must be:

  1. Links to news stories from...
  2. ...credible sources, with...
  3. ...their original headlines, that...
  4. ...would make people who see the headline think, “That has got to be a story from The Onion, America’s Finest News Source.”

Please also avoid duplicates.

Comments and post content must abide by the server rules for Lemmy.world and generally abstain from trollish, bigoted, or otherwise disruptive behavior that makes this community less fun for everyone.

And that’s basically it!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] norbert@kbin.social -1 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

If the military today wouldn't even have to get off base to fuck up the opposing side (proven false in recent conflicts btw) why does it matter if they're on their turf? Your own reasoning doesn't make any sense and ignores a ton of conflicts. You mentioned Afghanistan, who's in charge there now, is it the US?

The statement wasn't about how many people on whichever side die, but that pretending that "You don't need a gun to defend yourself because the federal government has missles" is an extremely poor, provably false argument. I support stronger gun laws, it's just a really bad take.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Asymmetric_warfare

[–] Kecessa@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 years ago (1 children)

It makes sense because they have maps of everything, that's a huge technical advantage over invading a country where no one but the locals know the terrain.

[–] norbert@kbin.social -1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

They have satellites and drones that can map everything relatively quickly, recon isn't the hard part. Topographical data doesn't win hearts and minds.

Like I said, I'm not against gun control though. I just feel like blanket "no guns!" statements aren't really productive to the conversation. It'd be like trying to discuss abortion with a Christian and demanding "abortions on demand up to 10 months no questions asked!"

It's just such a dismissive, "my way or the highway" take that it makes reasonable discussion impossible and guarantees gridlock.

[–] Kecessa@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 years ago

Satellites don't let you map tunnels and caves, that's the difference with fighting in the USA vs in Afghanistan or Iraq or Gaza, in the USA towns have maps of their underground and of all the buildings and heck, authorities have files on the people most likely to be armed and dangerous.