this post was submitted on 13 Dec 2023
1698 points (96.6% liked)

Political Memes

8027 readers
3302 users here now

Welcome to politcal memes!

These are our rules:

Be civilJokes are okay, but don’t intentionally harass or disturb any member of our community. Sexism, racism and bigotry are not allowed. Good faith argumentation only. No posts discouraging people to vote or shaming people for voting.

No misinformationDon’t post any intentional misinformation. When asked by mods, provide sources for any claims you make.

Posts should be memesRandom pictures do not qualify as memes. Relevance to politics is required.

No bots, spam or self-promotionFollow instance rules, ask for your bot to be allowed on this community.

No AI generated content.Content posted must not be created by AI with the intent to mimic the style of existing images

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] darganon@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Cause nobody ever committed crimes for USD?

[–] ryathal@sh.itjust.works 14 points 1 year ago (2 children)

When you do it with a computer it's patentable and turns into a billion dollar business.

[–] killeronthecorner@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

There's definitely more money to be made from people not having to talk to other people than I thought there would be, tbh

[–] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 1 year ago

there's no patent on bitcoin

[–] DragonTypeWyvern@literature.cafe 6 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

That's not the point of that particular claim.

It's actually embarrassing that we live in a world where people don't know crypto is for money laundering, whores, and drugs.

[–] magic_lobster_party@kbin.social 4 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Committing crime isn’t the primary purpose of USD.

[–] joranvar@feddit.nl 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I don't think it is ihe primary purpose of cryptocoin either. It's just that crime found a great valuable tool in it. Just like nuclear fission is not just for atomic bombs. Or the internet for porn. The most known use case is not always the only or intended one.

Not defending the money-grabbing, resource-hungry spectacle that it has become, but the original intent was probably a bit nobler than the current results.

ETA: ah, I see what you mean. Purpose as in current main use, not "intended purpose". I think I picked up the wrong meaning. My mistake.

Also, nothing wrong with porn, but everyone knows the internet should be about cat pictures.

[–] RickyRigatoni@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 year ago

Depends who you ask.

[–] MacNCheezus@lemmy.today 0 points 1 year ago

Not unless you count war crimes