this post was submitted on 01 Mar 2024
656 points (98.1% liked)

Memes

47216 readers
727 users here now

Rules:

  1. Be civil and nice.
  2. Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] pearsaltchocolatebar@discuss.online 38 points 1 year ago (2 children)

No, there's a good reason for them to exist, but they should be marked as such.

[–] Anticorp@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago (2 children)

What's the reason? A slightly cheaper cable where data isn't needed?

[–] Sparkega@lemmy.world 63 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Eliminates a malicious threat vector. Gives you piece of mind to charge your devices without worry that what you connect to is going to interact with your device.

[–] InformalTrifle@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] Sparkega@lemmy.world 4 points 11 months ago (1 children)

I’ll give you a piece of my mind.

Just kidding. Thanks for the correction

[–] InformalTrifle@lemmy.world 1 points 11 months ago

Your funny 🙂

[–] evranch@lemmy.ca 1 points 11 months ago

You finally described a reason for these otherwise frustrating cables to exist! Though I like the other suggested method better, a charge-only adapter that you apply to the end of a full featured cable.

[–] eyeon@lemmy.world 26 points 1 year ago

it's also safer when wanting to charge from untrusted chargers, though you can still get an adapter to block the data pins or just bring your own wall charger/battery when traveling

[–] flashgnash@lemm.ee 3 points 1 year ago

I think power only cables should exist because they are significantly cheaper, but they should have some kind of marking to differentiate them enforced by the standard