Sparkega

joined 2 years ago
[–] Sparkega@lemmy.world 4 points 11 months ago (1 children)

I’ll give you a piece of my mind.

Just kidding. Thanks for the correction

[–] Sparkega@lemmy.world 63 points 1 year ago (4 children)

Eliminates a malicious threat vector. Gives you piece of mind to charge your devices without worry that what you connect to is going to interact with your device.

[–] Sparkega@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

Give Swindon a chance.

[–] Sparkega@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Thanks for the recommendations! The only one I don't have already is Slime Rancher, which was 75% off!

[–] Sparkega@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

That's probably more accurate.

[–] Sparkega@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago (8 children)

Any recommendations?

[–] Sparkega@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago (2 children)

That's good but I still don't believe it.

[–] Sparkega@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Which game is that? The only one that came to mind was American McGee's Alice but that's a third person shooter.

[–] Sparkega@lemmy.world 12 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I experienced an instant game over a couple hours in on my first playthrough on the crashed nautiloid. When I found the wounded mind flayer, I tried to peer into his mind and failed the roll leading to him overpowering me. I became a thrall while Asterion and Shadowheart watched. No option to revive during the cutscene.

[–] Sparkega@lemmy.world 24 points 2 years ago

I'm 2+1 and tested positive for COVID last week. Immunity wanes.

[–] Sparkega@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

I hope you're right that it does phase out. Here is evidence that having cyber insurance makes you more of a target.

DS: Do your operators target organizations that have cyber insurance?

UNK: Yes, this is one of the tastiest morsels. Especially to hack the insurers first—to get their customer base and work in a targeted way from there. And after you go through the list, then hit the insurer themselves.

Interview

[–] Sparkega@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago (3 children)

I agree with the author's solution to organizations of protection and resilience and that paying ultimately hurts everyone. If everyone refused to pay, we may see these types of attacks diminish.

The challenge to cyber security professionals will always be the convincing senior leadership to understand why not paying is better in the long run.

Having that conversation in the moment is too late. There needs to be a cyber attack response plan communicated and approved before disaster strikes.

Even so, there will always be the friction of cost. Senior leaders will weigh the cost of paying to the cost of downtime/repair and the social stigma if your company provides a service to customers. If your original argument isn't strong enough, cost will win.

One more point is paying is also a systemic issue. Cyber insurance is becoming popular for business. What we have seen with some insurers, their solution for ransomware is coverage to pay the ransom, perpetuating the problem.

 

Researchers analyzed 190 million hacking events on a honeynet and categorized the types of hackers into Dungeons and Dragons classses.

Rangers evaluate the system and set conditions for a follow-on attack.

Thieves install cryptominers and other profiteering software.

Barbarians attempt to brute force their way into adjacent systems.

Wizards connect the newly compromised system to a previous to establish 'portals' to tunnel through to obscure their identity.

Bards have no apparent hacking skill and likely purchase or otherwise acquired access. They perform basic computer tasks.

view more: next ›