this post was submitted on 02 Mar 2025
507 points (94.9% liked)

Political Memes

6372 readers
2530 users here now

Welcome to politcal memes!

These are our rules:

Be civilJokes are okay, but don’t intentionally harass or disturb any member of our community. Sexism, racism and bigotry are not allowed. Good faith argumentation only. No posts discouraging people to vote or shaming people for voting.

No misinformationDon’t post any intentional misinformation. When asked by mods, provide sources for any claims you make.

Posts should be memesRandom pictures do not qualify as memes. Relevance to politics is required.

No bots, spam or self-promotionFollow instance rules, ask for your bot to be allowed on this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Like:

People should be allowed to exist

Social programs aren't communism

The system isn't working for the people

Edit:

I've changed my mind on this.

Let the DNC go full MAGA and when they lose, because they will lose, they get the heat and we can eject them forever. At least sit them in a corner.

Progressives, you fight if you want but I don't believe the elections will be fair so it's a win win for you.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Navarian@lemm.ee 15 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

"So it turns out veering gradually to the right just isn't working for us, it's probably the 'far left's' fault"

I knew as a European that the US only had two right wing parties, with the democratic party sitting firmly to the right of most of our centrist parties here, but this is just fucking stupid.

[–] EmpathicVagrant@lemmy.world 1 points 9 hours ago

Veering gradually to the right doesn’t work, let’s move harder to the right than previous cycles

[–] Noobnarski@lemmy.world 28 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Holy shit you guys are fucked.

[–] T00l_shed@lemmy.world 11 points 1 day ago

Yeah, that's a depressing read

[–] FauxLiving@lemmy.world 52 points 1 day ago (3 children)

move away from the dominance of small-dollar donors

"Only accept money from rich people."

[–] Crikeste@lemm.ee 12 points 1 day ago

And at the same time “get out of elite circles”

Democrats are fucking twisted.

[–] Clinicallydepressedpoochie@lemmy.world 22 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Why not? They're easier to please! Agenda: change nothing.

They have a proven track record already!

[–] theneverfox@pawb.social 2 points 19 hours ago

Dominance from... People giving you money because they like you? People who can't call you up to make or break your next election based on how you vote today?

Like even if you take it at face value and pretend it's all above board... What the fuck could you possibly mean by that?

[–] twocupsofsugar@lemmy.world 13 points 23 hours ago

I don't understand, so their goal is to shift from centrists to conservatives? What is even happening right now?

[–] AdrianTheFrog@lemmy.world 4 points 18 hours ago

Apparently (according to some random comment on Reddit where this was posted) this was written by an organization called "Third Way", that doesn't actually have influence in the government or either political party

[–] whydudothatdrcrane@lemmy.ml 9 points 23 hours ago

This is the Ratchet effect in action. Democrats did not heed the warnings about extremist right-wing propaganda spreading like wildfire. They now assume the voter basis is inherently fascist, and race to appease them.

Democrats are equally to blame for things, like the modern racist slave trade that is the "corrections" system. This puts them with the camp of critical-race-theory enemies. Many of them are transphobic as-fuck, which also puts them (partly) in the anti-gender camp.

I did not cite genocide and war-crimes in the above paragraph, because so many of you have made clear you are fine with it.

Centrists have made it clear, time and again, that they value middle-of-the-road fallacy above human lives, and they are willing to put those lives on the line to reifytheir trolley problem fetish. The centrist is someone who will literally say to Hitler "I will defend to the death your right to express your hate" and at the same time say to the trans woman "I will have to reduce your freedom of expression, because it is unpopular with my voter base, and we risk devolving into fascism".

This is how we got here. These mfers come every 4 years begging for leftist and anarchist votes, because the alternative is fascism. But they were themselves fascist the whole time, only with a broader social support. Now they lose that broader social support because 10 years of relentless, ludicrously funded propaganda have shifted the discussion 100 years back, they now bend over backwards to earn that social support again. This in unscrupulous.

In turn, it lends legitimacy to neofascism and shifts the institutional landscape even further. We should not concede one inch to anyone trying to water down human rights for political gain. Human rights are to be taken as a whole, especially at the times that the most illiterate and unnuanced fragile white masculinity reclaims racism, homophobia, transphobia and ableism with renewed confidence, this is not the time to let them score popularity points.

In fact, we need to escalate. The more we trigger the fascist voter base the better. Destroy the common sense, of the equal-opportunity capitalism apologist social democrat.

[–] Quadhammer@lemmy.world 3 points 19 hours ago

What would happen if everyone registered republican and fractured the party from the inside

[–] WorldsDumbestMan@lemmy.today 41 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Far-left is the "fuck you" solution that the left would take. In other words, Bernie Sanders. They should just let that man speak.

[–] Kaput@lemmy.world 43 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Calling Bernie Sanders fart left.. first thing the American people should do is reframe your left right references. The guy is centre-left. Democrat party is solid right and Republicans are radical far right.

[–] ameancow@lemmy.world 10 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Our Overton Window has been pushed clear out of the building, shoved into the drainage culvert around back, and it's slowly drifting downriver and out to sea.

[–] GreyEyedGhost@lemmy.ca 6 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I've read some people on right-wing comment chains say it's refreshing that the Overton Window is finally being pushed back to the right. In America.

[–] ameancow@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago

This shows how deeply our media bubbles bury segments of our population.

I'm betting those same people believe that Christians are being driven into the sea and the war on christmas is a real fight that they are losing.

[–] frezik@midwest.social 45 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Bernie Sanders is already the compromise.

[–] theneverfox@pawb.social 1 points 18 hours ago

I don't at all think you were saying this, but just put it out there, he himself isn't compromised. He's been a solid dude all along

He's just pushing the bare minimum to make the hurt stop. He's pushing in the correct direction, he just pushes for the most watered down, easy to sell version of things that would still address the core problems

But ultimately, he is indeed the compromise... It's the best they're going to get

[–] ChairmanMeow@programming.dev 82 points 1 day ago (4 children)

Trying to shift further right won't work. You can't do "what the other party does" because they already do it and they do it better.

Find original messaging, take back the narrative. Then you get to tell the story you're good at.

Trump does this exceptionally well. By spouting all kinds of shocking horseshit, the media doesn't stop talking about him. This lets him dominate the narrative. You could see them panic when Kamala was nominated, because suddenly the DNC controlled the narrative for a bit, and polling showed Kamala taking the lead. That advantage evaporated as Trump seized control of the front pages again.

This doesn't just happen in the US. Here in the Netherlands, the campaign was not initially but later on dominated by talk on migration from the PVV. Of course other parties tried to respond by talking about migration, which only helped to legitimise the PVVs talking points.

[–] ameancow@lemmy.world 11 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

That advantage evaporated as Trump seized control of the front pages again.

And don't forget the Dems panicking at the sudden signs of success and muzzling their best talking points, tying up Tim Walz and trying to appeal to moderates by parading Liz Cheney around instead of sticking to a really strong narrative, like how republicans are weird and what's in Project 2025.

Dems do NOT understand populism, or if they do they have a twisted perception of what drives common people and how to engage with people burned out with voting. Seeing the tone of the "rallies" being led by Schumer and Pelosi after the election to try to restore some amount of moral and drive told me clearly that the dem party is utterly cooked. They are out-of-touch, elitist, naive and stuck in some era of civility that never existed.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] HalfSalesman@lemm.ee 19 points 1 day ago (1 children)

How influential are these moderates at this point? If the DNC leadership is still paying attention to them, they are pants on head retarded.

Leftwing people don't fucking vote in primaries. People don't vote third party enough for it to act as anything but a spoiler benefiting fascists. Realistically the US military would turn people into a bloody paste if we attempted to rebel.

And now we might not even get elections in the future because we have authoritarians in charge ripping the functions and institutions of the government itself to shreds. Like... we are so fucking screwed.

[–] WarlordSdocy@lemmy.world 13 points 1 day ago

They're influential because the big donors like this stuff, it's the kind of changes that don't impact them and push away more left leaning policies that would hurt them. One of the points is literally ignoring small donors which is what average people are.

[–] missingno@fedia.io 84 points 1 day ago (6 children)

Do they think that Kamala lost because she was too far left?

[–] conditional_soup@lemm.ee 38 points 1 day ago (2 children)

As someone else noted, the right said that, because yeah, they're going to say that. Here in about two years, they're going to be saying Hitler and the Confederacy lost their wars because they were too woke. BUT WAIT there's more! As I understand it, when they gutted the Biden campaign to make it the Kamalampaign, they foisted a bunch of the high-level HRC campaign staff on her, which, if you look at it, explains why so much of the Kamalampaign looks and smells exactly like the Hillary campaign. Of course, when these doofuses lost again, rather than showing a smidge of self-awareness, they promptly gave interviews saying that it's clearly because they were too far left (socially, specifically, though I wouldn't be at all shocked to hear that they meant it economically too).

[–] HK65@sopuli.xyz 11 points 1 day ago

They already say Hitler was a socialist.

[–] WorldsDumbestMan@lemmy.today 8 points 1 day ago

Hitler had welfare and (tried) to spare a jewish friend. That makes him a commie!

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] SomeChick@lemmy.ca 4 points 23 hours ago

It always amazes me to see how clueless the Democrats are.

[–] thisphuckinguy@lemmy.world 1 points 18 hours ago

LMFAO. Get a fucking clue

[–] rocket_dragon@lemmy.dbzer0.com 151 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Jesus Christ, is this real?

Big cities have problems, but they are still far better off than small town rural America. There isn't some specific failure happening in large cities, you're seeing the broad inevitable enshittification of Capitalism as a system.

Democrats must be some serious masochists, they would actually rather take the blame thenselves than admit capitalism is wrong.

DNC: we tried bootlicking billionaires and it didn't work, what if we double down on bootlicking billionaires even harder.

[–] LostWon@lemmy.ca 70 points 1 day ago (3 children)

It's also reported here. This fits with the reports of complaining that Democratic Congresspeople have been doing about the progressive wing of the party wanting them to fight back against DOGE. They and party leadership may well be aiming to not just talk like it, but fully become the new Republican party, in hopes of having a stampede of "moderate" Republicans who aren't happy with Trump come their way.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] njm1314@lemmy.world 31 points 1 day ago (9 children)

I've been saying this for a number of months now you got to kill this party. Abandon it completely. We got to start a new party. We got to start a labor party. A worker party. A party of the people. Whatever we want to call it, but whatever it's called it's a party that's not for the big corporate donors that control the Democratic Party. The Democratic party basically since the late '70s but certainly since the '80s abandoned the people the peoples issues. They're not coming back.

load more comments (9 replies)
[–] cybervseas@lemmy.world 109 points 1 day ago (2 children)

The…dominance of small-dollar donors? I wish.

[–] AstridWipenaugh@lemmy.world 55 points 1 day ago (4 children)

If the small donors are dominating... Why would you abandon them?

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] cybersin@lemm.ee 61 points 1 day ago (1 children)

The "far left" has a disproportionate influence on policy and messaging?

What a joke.

They're going to use this defeat to blame progressives and Walz (who consistently had the highest favorability of anyone on either side of the race) instead of their conservative cop Kamala.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] PugJesus@lemmy.world 25 points 1 day ago (1 children)

What's not mentioned in this excerpt is that this was sponsored by Third Way, a think tank that is singlemindedly devoted to convincing Democrats to cut the left out of the party. God knows the DNC has its problems, but it's misleading to frame this as a mainstream Democratic conference.

"Moderates say party should go moderate" shocker

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›