this post was submitted on 03 Mar 2025
568 points (96.9% liked)

Technology

64937 readers
4180 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] ohshittheyknow@lemmynsfw.com 69 points 6 days ago (5 children)

AI is a tool, like a hammer. Useful when used for its purpose. Unfortunately every tech company under the sun is using it for the wrong fucking thing. I don't need AI in my operating system or my browser or my search engine. Just let it work on protein folding, chemical synthesis and other more useful applications. Honestly can't wait for the AI hype to calm the fuck down.

[–] AbsoluteChicagoDog@lemm.ee 27 points 6 days ago

You forgot mass surveillance. It's great at that.

[–] Tattorack@lemmy.world 19 points 6 days ago (2 children)

The only way it's going to die down is if it gets replaced with the next tech bro buzzword.

The previous one was "smart", and it stuck around for a very long time.

[–] Cryophilia@lemmy.world 18 points 6 days ago (1 children)
[–] Sturgist@lemmy.ca 1 points 6 days ago

Seem to have forgotten NFT. Swear to fuck, if some firm thought their customers really were that dumb, they'd have claimed that every bottle of their milk had an integrated NFT and the lactose protein was backed by the Blockchain™.

[–] cyberpunk007@lemmy.ca 6 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Preach it. I have been so sick of AI hype and rolling my eyes any time a business advertises it, and in some cases moving on. I don't care about your glorified chat bot or search engine.

[–] bitjunkie@lemmy.world 1 points 6 days ago

AI is the buzzword for a search engine that actually fucking works, something we used to have that gradually got enshittified out of existence

[–] drmoose@lemmy.world 2 points 6 days ago

It'll balance out. I'm old enough to remember many web tech being this way from flash, to Bluetooth to Cloud.

[–] Petter1@lemm.ee 1 points 6 days ago

It works pretty well as research/learn tool at my job.. I learned a lot very fast using AI as a tool in my browser.

[–] shads@lemy.lol 28 points 6 days ago (2 children)

Hmm, not meaning to get my conspiracy hat on here but do we think this could relate to the fact that Microsoft now has a quantum computing chip that they can hype to their investors to show they have the next big thing in the bag?

AI has served its purpose and is no longer strategically necessary?

Since they are only spending investors money it doesn't matter if they burn billions on leading the industry down the wrong path and now they can let it rot on the vine and rake in the next round of funding while the competition scrambles to catch up.

[–] _stranger_@lemmy.world 5 points 6 days ago

Literally IBM a decade ago. AI->Quantum

[–] balder1991@lemmy.world 1 points 6 days ago (1 children)

How would that be a conspiracy. If the AI bubble bursts eventually, I’m sure Microsoft won’t want to be among the last ones to leave.

[–] shads@lemy.lol 1 points 6 days ago

Had a big thing written out, didn't like it when I read it back. So keeping it simple, I equivocated to try to deflect some of the potential rough replies from the cultists who have already drunk the Koolaid.

[–] BlameTheAntifa@lemmy.world 10 points 6 days ago (1 children)

There’s no need for huge, expensive datacenters when we can run everything on our own devices. SLMs and local AI is the future.

[–] yarr@feddit.nl 5 points 6 days ago (1 children)

This feels kinda far fetched. It's like saying "well, we won't need cars, because we'll all just have jetpacks that we use to get around." I totally agree that eventually a useful model will run on a phone. I disagree it's going to be soon enough to matter to this discussion. To give you some ideas, DeepSeek is a recent model. It's 671B parameters. Devices like phones are running 7-14B models. So, eventually what you say will be feasible, but we have a ways to go.

[–] BlameTheAntifa@lemmy.world 0 points 6 days ago

The difference is that we’ll just be running small, specialized, on-demand models instead of huge, resource-heavy, all-purpose models. It’s already being done. Just look at how Google and Apple are approaching AI on mobile devices. You don’t need a lot of power for that, just plenty of storage.

[–] gmtom@lemmy.world 13 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Yeah I mean, when has Microsoft of all companies ever been wring about the future of technology.......

[–] cyberpunk007@lemmy.ca 3 points 6 days ago

Hmmm let me just bring this on Internet explorer on my windows phone.

[–] WhatSay@slrpnk.net 6 points 6 days ago (1 children)

It's not like Microsoft has their finger on the pulse of technology advancement, they only got involved with AI to seem relevant, and now it's not worth doing anymore.

[–] balder1991@lemmy.world 5 points 6 days ago

I was thinking this. Microsoft got some participation on OpenAI and has been paying them with cheap credits to run on their data centers. I guess they’re starting to worry that once the house of cards collapse, they’ll be the ones to pick up the pieces for any over-investment.

Maybe thanks to tariffs the importation of components made overseas will become cost prohibitive vs any expected potential gains from further development of LLM/AI. Or, perhaps in addition, an expected economic downturn has caused them to re-evaluate large investments in the immediate future. Or maybe they think AI is dumb.

[–] RizzRustbolt@lemmy.world 2 points 6 days ago

Poor ELIZA, she's going to have to start hitting the corner's again.

[–] Petter1@lemm.ee 0 points 6 days ago

I see it more like they are confident to get running LLMs less resource intensive 🤔

[–] MisterMoo@lemmy.world 0 points 6 days ago

WYEA? 🌝🤡

[–] Blue_Morpho@lemmy.world 121 points 1 week ago (21 children)

Cancelling new data centers because deep seek has shown a more efficient path isn't proof that AI is dead as the author claims.

Fiber buildouts were cancelled back in 2000 because multimode made existing fiber more efficient. The Internet investment bubble popped. That didn't mean the Internet was dead.

[–] scarabic@lemmy.world 2 points 4 days ago

This is a good point. It’s never sat right with me that LLMs require such overwhelming resources and cannot be optimized. It’s possible that innovation has been too fast to worry about optimization yet, but all this BS about building new power plants and chip foundries for trillions of dollars and whatnot just seems mad.

[–] contrafibularity@lemmy.world 74 points 1 week ago (3 children)

yeah, genai as a technology and field of study may not disappear. genai as an overinflated product marketed as the be all end all that would solve all of humanity's problems may. the bubble can't burst soon enough

[–] scarabic@lemmy.world 1 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

Sometimes the hype bubble bursts and then the products eventually grows to be even larger than the hype. But you never know how connected hype actually is to any realistic timeline. Hype can pop like a cherry tree flowering on the first sunny day of spring, thinking summer has arrived, but then get drenched by another few weeks of rain. And as stupid as that cherry tree is, summer will eventually arrive.

[–] frezik@midwest.social 2 points 6 days ago

Historically, the field of AI research has gone through boom and bust cycles. The first boom was during the Vietnam War with DARPA dumping money into it. As opposition to the Vietnam War grew, DARPA funding dried up, and the field went into hibernation with only minor advancement for decades. Then the tech giant monopolies saw an opportunity for a new bubble.

It'd be nice if it could be funded at a more steady, sustainable level, but apparently capitalism can't do that.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (19 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›