this post was submitted on 08 Mar 2025
637 points (97.5% liked)

Greentext

5434 readers
2130 users here now

This is a place to share greentexts and witness the confounding life of Anon. If you're new to the Greentext community, think of it as a sort of zoo with Anon as the main attraction.

Be warned:

If you find yourself getting angry (or god forbid, agreeing) with something Anon has said, you might be doing it wrong.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] nutsack@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 16 hours ago

as an extreme wagie i would destroy this man with my fart. he would not even eat the pizza

[–] neineon77@lemmy.blahaj.zone 52 points 1 day ago (2 children)

as someone who's worked in food service (fuck this guy for "wagies") I don't care if papa domino loses 50 cents but I do care about losing my job bc my manager saw me give it away to some asshole who thinks he's above the workers that make his food.

my job isn't worth you saving 50 cents

[–] LeninOnAPrayer@lemm.ee 2 points 2 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago) (1 children)

The problem here is that the relationship is alienated from the person actually being an asshole. Under wage labor the customer and the employee are both a part of the same class. They both work wage jobs and both have to deal with the frustrations of those jobs.

The one sense of "freedom" that the wage laborers feel is how they spend their money. They are alienated from the actual material impacts of their work. They are offered only a wage and given no incentive to form a relationship with their place of work beyond the paycheck.

So their entire expression of their labor is based upon their consumption and how they spend their earned wages. This is why we have a disconnect between two wage owners. They are both frustrated with the "laws" that govern their consumption and their labor.

The Domino's employee is frustrated because the customer is making his labor more difficult. He just wants to do the least amount of labor for his pay and ensure his employment is secure.

The Domino's customer is frustrated because the employee has no control over the means of production. He cannot verbally tell the "owner" of the business his frustrations.

They are both alienated from the beneficiary of the labor and the consumption. It frustrates both of them.

I would say it is one of the most "human" feelings we can have. It is one of the most conflicting parts of capitalism that contridicts human nature.

We want to share the products of our labor, see the beneficiaries of it, and gain praise for it. Our current economic systems are in direct contradiction of this.

Which is why you'll find people in this thread siding with both the employee and the customer. When the real asshole is the dude deciding garlic sauce should be 50 cents because it makes a line go up on a graph. The same asshole that hasn't set foot in a Domino's pizza in their entire life.

Edit: One assumption here is that both these people are wage laborers. The nonwage laborer often has a different reason for being an asshole to employees. I have never heard "wagie" as a negative thing until now. I kinda assumed it was almost a "solidarity" term and less so derogatory. But I assumed wrong.

But even so. The wage laborer can see themselves in a different position as a "consumer" and ignore their own class position when they spend their wage. It is their only time to "be the boss".

This ia such a fantastic summary of this post. Encapsulates everything I felt but couldn't put into words. Thank you, fellow wagie.

[–] RowRowRowYourBot@sh.itjust.works 13 points 18 hours ago

“The cost of your entitlement is my job”

[–] anotherpurpleheathen@lemmy.blahaj.zone 10 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

This has the same energy as Lonely Island's song "I threw it on the ground". The male Karen.

[–] Snowpix@lemmy.ca 4 points 14 hours ago (1 children)
[–] BreadOven@lemmy.world 2 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

Whenever anyone says "wagie" I know they're a soft little suburban boy who has never worked a day in their life. I feel like being that much of an idiot is its own punishment

[–] Mouselemming@sh.itjust.works 43 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Anything a store gives you "free" (as Anon says Papa John's garlic) has already been priced in.

I worked in a gift shop, we did "free" gift wrapping and it was beautiful. But the cost of boxes, rolls of ribbon and reams of tissue paper were factored into our markup throughout the store. We had really nice things, so a lot of our customers would come in for a gift and spend as much or more on items for themselves, which just needed to be bagged. Maybe bubble wrap for the trip home, but that was reused from things shipped to us. So we made extra profit, while also giving them and their friends ideas for their next gift. Wealthy people, so they didn't care.

[–] Master167@lemmy.world 5 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

Yeah, this is how businesses work. They provide what you are looking for at that moment. But to get you to come back, they “provide” other items and services for free to get that future business. This is a way businesses can be “long term” greedy. They’ll still make a profit because those additional costs are in the price of your original purchase.

However, you aren’t guaranteed that future business. So, businesses have moved to “short term” greedy by charging for everything else while keeping the original purchase price “competitive” or just as pricey.

[–] RowRowRowYourBot@sh.itjust.works 1 points 18 hours ago

Or you pursue weirder spaces to get profit ie I had a boss who hated her cousin but flew to India for his wedding because the bride’s brother ran a paper factory. She came back having spent $10k on gift wrap and bags that would have cost $100k+ here. We sold bags for $7 that cost $0.13. Our highest profit item in awine shop was a paper bag. We of course would give these out for “free” when we needed to.

[–] sp3tr4l@lemmy.zip 65 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

Wait until anon figures out that there's a waaaaay higher markup on soda/pop than on condiments sold for a distinct and seperate cost, and that's how a lot of franchise restaurants make a large chunk of their profits.

As in, 1,125% percent markup.

As in, if you pay $2 for a soda, it actually cost the fast food place about 0.18 cents.

Not 18 cents, 0.18 cents.

...

Also, why would an employee care about ringing up a 50 cent condiment?

... Anon has clearly never worked fast food.

Absolutely chalk full of petty vindictive tyrant bosses that will prevent a promotion, chew you out, take that 50 cents out of your pay, and if you regularly do that, fire you, and possibly even report you to the police for some kind of petty crime that boils down to 'stealing from the company'.

Wagies are often pathetic because their bosses are often evil and cruel, and they can't afford to lose the job.

[–] TwoBeeSan@lemmy.world 35 points 1 day ago (4 children)

We threw out GALLONS of food everyday. If that cunt middle manager saw someone getting a to go plate before it was scooped into the trash shed write you up.

It must attract a specific kinda of person.

[–] sp3tr4l@lemmy.zip 15 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Yep.

Could feed a lot of homeless or low income people if you take all of that kind of food waste across a whole town or city.

But when non profits pop up to try to do the logistics of that, well now this garbage actually costs more than they can afford.

Petty Tyrants.

People who get off on power; the ability to control and harm and be superior to others is vital to their idea of well-being.

[–] RowRowRowYourBot@sh.itjust.works 2 points 17 hours ago

There’s several problems here:

Giving homeless people food you cannot serve due to it being under heat lamps too long isn’t cool. If it’s risky for you it’s riskier for them as they don’t have their own space to be sick in. This is why many hot dishes are thrown out.

Homeless shelters and food assistance programs discourage giving old food as it sends the message to recipients that they aren’t worth getting a fresh meal. It’s about decency.

My mom ran an interim housing program, a food bank, and a homeless shelter. When restaurants gave food they made it for the shelter. It wasn’t their leftovers. The only things that were “old” were the Starbuck’s pastries as they drove them over twice a day and thus the guys at the shelter weren’t getting stale stuff.

[–] RowRowRowYourBot@sh.itjust.works -1 points 18 hours ago

Letting people take home food increases losses as your staff will make extra to take home so it “won’t get thrown out”. As loss is a hugely important metric in restaurants you don’t want to encourage this.

Yeah, it attracts people who feel powerless in their own life, so they're desperate for any amount of power they can hold over someone else.

[–] easily3667@lemmus.org 7 points 1 day ago

Weirdly a lot of overlap with people who work in HR

[–] dogma11@lemmy.world 19 points 1 day ago (2 children)

I learned about this years ago when I pulled into a McDonalds at midnight for coffee. Guy said they didn't have any made but would make a pot, and that me buying the cup of coffee paid for the whole large pot.

[–] sp3tr4l@lemmy.zip 9 points 1 day ago

Not 100% sure, but the margins on coffee are probably nowhere near as high as on fountain drinks.

My guess would be around an order of magnitide less.

Still considerable, but the margin on soft drinks is absurd.

I think bottled water is the next step down from the absurd margins of fountain soda.

You only get about three larges out of a pot of McCafe drip but indeed the packets of coffee are the cheapest commodity Brazilian coffee they can find

[–] Bosht@lemmy.world 78 points 1 day ago (2 children)

I agree with both sides of the argument, but lean more toward the dude who posted.

[–] spacecadet@lemm.ee 65 points 1 day ago (1 children)

When I worked in a restaurant we were supposed to charge for stuff like that, but I knew it would tick people off and take away from my tip so I never did. I don’t care if some multi-millionaire loses a couple fractions of a penny so I can gain several dollars in tips.

[–] PseudorandomNoise@lemmy.world 67 points 1 day ago

Problem is those multi-millionares are the type of assholes who would fire someone for not charging 50¢ for a stupid packet of sauce.

[–] SARGE@startrek.website 19 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Companies make absolute fucking bank over "small insignificant" things like this.

Yes it's only 50¢ but how many people every day think to themselves "oh it's just 50 cents"

Then add that up over the whole year, for every location.

It quickly becomes much more than the "insignificant" 50¢.

And they know you are more likely to pay it and keep quiet than argue or simply not buy the item.

Sure it's "just 50 cents" for you, but for the company, by the end of the day it's more than most make in a year.

Note: actual dollar amounts company-wide for garlic cups is not something I happen to know, but based on how much I've seen them slinging cups into the boxes while I wait for my pizza, it's gotta be a lot.

[–] other_cat@lemmy.zip 3 points 1 day ago

I feel like these have been rising in price too.

[–] rockerface@lemm.ee 15 points 1 day ago (2 children)

I've stopped adding sauce to my McDonald's and KFC orders after my friend showed me a bottled sauce brand that is literally made by the same manufacturer, tastes the same and can be bought in any supermarket in Ukraine for much lower price per serving.

Surely if you want to save up on sauce, you can do some research and find the brand that fits the taste.

[–] B0rax@feddit.org 1 points 14 hours ago

Mind sharing the brand?

and seriously, you can do better, sauces tend to keep for a while, especially the quality youd get there, and YOU CAN MAKE BETTER OMG. a five dollar (fuck) bottle and two dollars of ingredients makes a years worth of most of these kinds of sauces in bulk.

[–] magnetosphere@fedia.io 41 points 1 day ago (7 children)

I’m just hearing the term “wagies” for the first time, and I don’t like it. Workers who deal with obnoxious customers like Anon deserve common courtesy, not a demeaning nickname.

[–] driving_crooner@lemmy.eco.br 23 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Imagine being an unemployed loser referring to workers as "wagies".

[–] magnetosphere@fedia.io 11 points 1 day ago

I guess it’s like racism and other forms of bigotry. Creating a reason to look down on others (even when, deep down, you know it’s bullshit) helps you feel less awful about your own pathetic self.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Fizz@lemmy.nz 17 points 1 day ago

On chans a lot of people aspire to live a neet life (not in education employment or trainin) and thus there is a dynamic where "based neet chads" look down on and mock the wagies that are forced to work.

Its a safe bet anyone using the term unironically is likely a complete goblin with no life.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] Cornflake@pawb.social 32 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I'm with the employee on this one. Dude's just doing his job, it's not their fault if the policy is sucky

[–] unexposedhazard@discuss.tchncs.de 16 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Yeah if he gets caught giving them out for free, he might get fired and his perhaps only source of income might be gone. Nobody will risk that unless they are dumb.

[–] Artyom@lemm.ee 14 points 1 day ago (4 children)

Don't forget that many foods have been designed to be too dry without the premium sauce. A local burger bar by me charges $2 for mustard on a burger that would otherwise be completely dry.

[–] lightnsfw@reddthat.com 11 points 1 day ago

If i got to a burger place that doesn't have condiments on the table I'm out of there.

[–] MrJameGumb@lemmy.world 10 points 1 day ago

That seems like sacrilege. I don't think I would ever go somewhere that charges extra for mustard on a burger

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] MrJameGumb@lemmy.world 18 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (3 children)

Since I posted this I guess I'll throw in my two cents...

As a customer I kind of agree with Anon in that it's just a sauce cup, and hardly worth ringing up a whole separate transaction for

As someone who has worked for a giant souless corporation I kind of agree with the employee in that someone somewhere is keeping track of those sauce cups. They put in an allowance for what they call "shrinkage", but if enough sauce cups go unaccounted for someone from corporate will happily fire everyone in the store and replace them within 24 hours.

I think real point I'm want to get across here though is that Domino's sucks. Their pizza is gross and it gives you heartburn almost immediately, and their garlic sauce tastes like shit.

Support your local pizzaria 👍

[–] LainTrain@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 day ago

This makes me wonder what the fuck they must put in US Domino's because in the UK it's considered perfectly decent pizza, usually quite a bit more expensive than the crappy dodgy pizza shops about and it most certainly doesn't give you heartburn nor any other health issues. It must be one of those high fructose corn syrup soda type things, tried it once and it fucked up my stomach for days, us mtn dew is actual swill.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] sxan@midwest.social 20 points 1 day ago (3 children)

I'm with the customer on this. The responder is singer sort of shill who probably is responsible for decisions at their company that nickle and dime customers with hidden fees.

Fuck those deceitful bloodsuckers.

[–] glimse@lemmy.world 36 points 1 day ago (3 children)

"I might get fired if I give a paid item away for free" is a completely reasonable thing for a minimum wage worker to worry about.

I agree with the customer, of course, but let's not pretend that it's bootlicking when people have bills to pay

[–] sxan@midwest.social 9 points 1 day ago (2 children)

I didn't see anything where the customer was suggesting the server should bypass the rules. I was talking about the Anon responder who mocked the Anon customer for bitching about the policy.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Blue_Morpho@lemmy.world 15 points 1 day ago

Except the manager is going to notice the loss over the month and fire the worker for "stealing".

The worker is just trying to survive. The owner needs to be harassed.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Rhaedas@fedia.io 14 points 1 day ago

The argument over who is right, the consumer or the employee, is exactly what the companies want. If charging for every small thing was a big deal they'd see it in the totals as people stopped coming and pass the cost on some other way to provide "free" stuff. But people just gripe about it and come back, and keep blaming the stupid worker again because it's "clearly" their fault. And the company takes their money happily.

load more comments
view more: next ›