this post was submitted on 12 Mar 2025
1201 points (99.2% liked)

Technology

66067 readers
5318 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

A survey of more than 2,000 smartphone users by second-hand smartphone marketplace SellCell found that 73% of iPhone users and a whopping 87% of Samsung Galaxy users felt that AI adds little to no value to their smartphone experience.

SellCell only surveyed users with an AI-enabled phone – thats an iPhone 15 Pro or newer or a Galaxy S22 or newer. The survey doesn’t give an exact sample size, but more than 1,000 iPhone users and more than 1,000 Galaxy users were involved.

Further findings show that most users of either platform would not pay for an AI subscription: 86.5% of iPhone users and 94.5% of Galaxy users would refuse to pay for continued access to AI features.

From the data listed so far, it seems that people just aren’t using AI. In the case of both iPhone and Galaxy users about two-fifths of those surveyed have tried AI features – 41.6% for iPhone and 46.9% for Galaxy.

So, that’s a majority of users not even bothering with AI in the first place and a general disinterest in AI features from the user base overall, despite both Apple and Samsung making such a big deal out of AI.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Stormy1701@lemmy.zip 4 points 25 minutes ago

AI is a bad idea completely and if people cared at all about their privacy they should disable it.

It’s all well and good to say that AI categorises pictures and allows you to search for people and places in them, but how do you think that is accomplished? The AI scan and remembers every picture on your phone. Same with email summaries. It’s reading your emails too.

The ONLY assurance that this data isn’t being sent back to HQ is the companies word that it isn’t. And being closed source we have no possible way of auditing their use of data to see if that’s true.

Do you trust Apple and/or Google? Because you shouldn’t.

Especially now when setting up a new AI capable iPhone or iPad Apple Intelligence is enabled by DEFAULT.

It should be OPT-IN, not opt-out.

All AI can ever really do is invade your privacy and make humans even more stupid than they are already. Now they don’t even have to go to a search engine to look for things. They ask the AI and blindly believe what ever bullshit it regurgitates at them.

AI is dangerous on many levels because soon it will be deciding who gets hired for a new job, who gets seen first in the ER and who gets that heart transplant, and who dies.

[–] diffusive@lemmy.world 11 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

I hate that nowadays AI == LLM/chatbot.

I love the AI classifiers that keep me safe from spam or that help me categorise pictures. I love the AI based translators that allow me to write in virtually any language almost like a real speaker.

What I hate is these super advanced stocastic parrots that manage to pass the Turing test and, so, people assume they think.

I am pretty sure that they asked specifically about LLM/chatbots the percentage of people not caring would be even higher

[–] BoJackHorseman@lemm.ee 2 points 37 minutes ago

AI present on Apple and Samsung phones are indeed useless.

They have small language models that summarise notification and rewrite your messages and emails. Those are pretty useless.

Image editing AI that removes unwanted people from your photos have some use.

However top AI tools like deep research, Cursor which millions of developers are using to assist developers with coding are objectively very useful.

[–] missandry351@lemmings.world 1 points 16 minutes ago

Well, as a user of both, I agree.

[–] bampop@lemmy.world 1 points 43 minutes ago* (last edited 37 minutes ago)

I think the article is missing the point on two levels.

First is the significance of this data, or rather lack of significance. The internet existed for 20-some years before the majority of people felt they had a use for it. AI is similarly in a finding-its-feet phase where we know it will change the world but haven't quite figured out the details. After a period of increased integration into our lives it will reach a tipping point where it gains wider usage, and we're already very close to that.

Also they are missing what I would consider the two main reasons people don't use it yet.

First, many people just don't know what to do with it (as was the case with the early internet). The knowledge/imagination/interface/tools aren't mature enough so it just seems like a lot of effort for minimal benefits. And if the people around you aren't using it, you probably don't feel the need.

Second reason is that the thought of it makes people uncomfortable or downright scared. Quite possibly with good reason. But even if it all works out well in the end, what we're looking at is something that will drive the pace of change beyond what human nature can easily deal with. That's already a problem in the modern world but we aint seen nothing yet. The future looks impossible to anticipate, and that's scary. Not engaging with AI is arguably just hiding your head in the sand, but maybe that beats contemplating an existential terror that you're powerless to stop.

[–] PieMePlenty@lemmy.world 5 points 1 hour ago* (last edited 1 hour ago) (1 children)

Doesn't help that I don't know what this "AI" is supposed to be doing on my phone.
Touch up a few photos on my phone? Ok go ahead, ill turn it off when I want a pure photography experience (or use a DSLR).
Text prediction? Yeah why not.. I mean, is it the little things like that?
So it feels like either these companies dont know how to use "AI" or they dont know how to market it... or more likely they know one way to market it and the marketing department is driving the development. Im sure theres good uses but it seems like they dont want to put in the work and just give us useless ones.

[–] Robaque@feddit.it 6 points 1 hour ago

Useless for us, but not for them. They want us to use them like personalised confidante-bots so they can harvest our most intimate data

[–] Red_October@lemmy.world 9 points 2 hours ago

Not just useless but actively unwelcome.

[–] SirFasy@lemmy.world 2 points 1 hour ago

Everybody hates AI, and these companies keep trying to push it because they're so desperate for investors. Oh, I want to be a fly on the wall of a meeting room when the bubble finally pops.

[–] umbrella@lemmy.ml 18 points 4 hours ago

please burst that bubble already so i can get a second hand server grade gpu

[–] Goldholz@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 2 hours ago

I have never used this bixbi AI

[–] UltraMagnus0001@lemmy.world 12 points 4 hours ago

It actually made my Google speakers assistant dumber because I think they're trying to merge the 2

[–] astro_plane@lemm.ee 8 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago) (1 children)

I side graded from a iPhone 12 to an Xperia as a toy to tinker around with recently and I disabled Gemini on my phone not long after it let me join the beta.

Everything seemed half baked. Not only were the awnsers meh and it felt like an invasion of privacy after reading to user agreement. Gemini can't even play a song on your phone, or get you directions home, what an absolute joke.

[–] Eagle0110@lemmy.world 3 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

Ironically, on my Xperia 1 VI (which I specifically chose as my daily driver because of all the compromises on flagship phones from other brands) I had the only experience where I actually felt like a smartphone feature based on machine learning helped my experience, even though the Sony phones had practically no marketing with the AI buzzwords at all.

Sony actually trained a machine learning model for automatically identifying face and eye location for human and animal subjects in the built-in camera app, in order to be able to keep the face of your subject in focus at all time regardless how they move around. Allegedly it's a very clever solution trained for identifying skeletal position to in turn identify head and eye positions, it works particularly well for when your subject moves around quickly which is where this is especially helpful.

And it works so incredibly well, wayyyyy better than any face tracking I had on any other smartphone or professional camera, it made it so so much easier for me to take photos and videos of my super active kitten and pet mice lol

[–] astro_plane@lemm.ee 2 points 53 minutes ago* (last edited 50 minutes ago) (1 children)

That's pretty neat, I think that's a great example of how machine learning being useful for everyday activities. Face detection on cameras has been a big issue ever since the birth of digital photography. I'm using a Japanese 5 III that I picked up for $130 and its been great. I've heard of being able to side load camera apps from other Xperias onto the 5 III so I'll give it a try.

I think Sony makes great hardware and their phones have some classy designs and I'm also a fan of their DSLR'S. I've always admired there phones going back to the Ericson Walkmans, their designs have aged amazingly. I apreciate how close to stock Sony's Xperia phones are, I dont like UI's and bloatware you cant remove. My last Android phone a Galaxy S III was terrible in that regard and put me off from buying another Android until recently. I was actually thinking about getting a 1 VI as my next phone and install lineage on it now that I'm ready to commit.

[–] Eagle0110@lemmy.world 1 points 18 minutes ago

I totally agree with the AOSP-like ROM and I love it so much too, especially since Sony also makes it super straightforward to root (took me less than 10 minutes) with no artificial function limitations after root (unlike the Samsung models where you can even root at all), so a highly AOSP-like ROM also means a lot of the cook OS customization tools originally developed for Pixel phones, where most of such community development efforts are focused on, tend to mostly work too on th Xperia phones :p

For side-loading Sony native apps from other models, I tried the old pro video recording app from previous gen (the Cinema Pro) on my Xperia 1 VI just for curiosity (since the new unified camera app with all the pro camera and pro video features included in a single app is definitely an usability improvement lol), and it worked fine, so it might work too if you side-load the new camera app onto your older model, feel free to DM me if you're interested to experiment with this and I can try the various methods for exporting that app and send to you.

Although Lineage OS is not yet available for the gen VI model since it only came out in 2024, however the previous gen V model got its first Lineage OS release in around September, 2024, so it might not take that long to get Lineage OS for the gen VI model :D

[–] assassinatedbyCIA@lemmy.world 21 points 6 hours ago* (last edited 6 hours ago)

Do I use Gen AI extensively?…

No but, do I find it useful?…..

Also no.

[–] fritobugger2017@lemmy.world 23 points 6 hours ago (3 children)

My kids school just did a survey and part of it included questions about teaching technology with a big focus on the use of AI. My response was "No" full stop. They need to learn how to do traditional research first so that they can spot check the error ridden results generated by AI. Damn it school, get off the bandwagon.

[–] Akito@lemm.ee 0 points 42 minutes ago

And what exactly is the difference between researching shit sources on plain internet and getting the same shit via an AI, except manually it takes 6 hours and with AI it takes 2 minutes?

[–] AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world 3 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

I say this as an education major, and former teacher. That being said, please keep fighting your PTA on this.

We didn't get actually useful information in high school, partially because our parents didn't think there was anything wrong with the curriculum.

I'm absolutely certain that there are multiple subjects that you may have skipped out on, if you'd had any idea that civics, shop, home economics, and maybe accounting were going to be the closest classes to "real world skills that all non collegate educated people still need to know."

[–] fritobugger2017@lemmy.world 1 points 1 hour ago

I regret not taking shop and home economics. Filing taxes and balancing checkbooks would be good skills to learn also.

[–] Lifter@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 4 hours ago

I suppose that's exactly what they should be teaching.

"PLEASE use our hilariously power inefficient wrongness machine."

[–] clot27@lemm.ee 3 points 4 hours ago

It is, for everybody mostly.

[–] LeninOnAPrayer@lemm.ee 11 points 6 hours ago* (last edited 6 hours ago) (1 children)

AI is not there to be useful for you. It is there to be useful for them. It is a perfect tool for capturing every last little thought you could have and direct to you perfectly on what they can sell you.

It's basically one big way to sell you shit. I promise we will follow the same path as most tech. It'll be useful for some stuff and in this case it's being heavily forced upon us whether we like it or not. Then it's usefulness will be slowly diminished as it's used more heavily to capitalize on your data, thoughts, writings, code, and learn how to suck every last dollar from you whether you're at work or at home.

It's why DeepSeek spent so little and works better. They literally were just focusing on the tech.

All these billions are not just being spent on hardware or better optimized software. They are being spent on finding the best ways to profit from these AI systems. It's why they're being pushed into everything.

You won't have a choice on whether you want to use it or not. It'll soon by the only way to interact with most systems even if it doesn't make sense.

Mark my words. When Google stops standard search on their home page and it's a fucking AI chat bot by default. We are not far off from that.

It's not meant to be useful for you.

[–] astro_plane@lemm.ee 3 points 4 hours ago

Yes, it seems like no one even read the damn user agreement. AI just adds another level to our surveillance state. Its only there to collect information about you and to figure out the inner workings of its users minds to sell ads. Gemini even listens to your conversations if you have the quick access toggle enabled.

[–] TylerBourbon@lemmy.world 26 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

I do not need it, and I hate how it's constantly forced upon me.

Current AI feels like the Metaverse. There's no demand for it or need for it, yet they're trying their damndest to shove it into anything and everything like it's a new miracle answer to every problem that doesn't exist yet.

And all I see it doing is making things worse. People use it to write essays in school; that just makes them dumber because they don't have to show they understand the topic they're writing. And considering AI doesn't exactly have a flawless record when it comes to accuracy, relying on it for anything is just not a good idea currently.

[–] Akito@lemm.ee 1 points 40 minutes ago

If they write essays with it and the teacher is not checking their actual knowledge, the teacher is at fault, not the AI. AI is literally just a tool, like a pen or a ruler in school. Except much much bigger and much much more useful.

It is extremely important to teach children, how to handle AI properly and responsibly or else they will be fucked in the future.

[–] keiznklei@lemm.ee 5 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

Students are currently one of the major benefactors of LLMs lol.

[–] silasmariner@programming.dev 1 points 1 hour ago

Not sure students are necessarily benefiting? The point of education isn't to hand in completed assignments. Although my wife swears that the Duolingo AI is genuinely helping her with learning French so I guess maybe, depending on how it's being used

[–] reiterationstation@lemm.ee 3 points 5 hours ago (2 children)

Am I crazy? I’ve got this thing writing code and listing website listings. I ask it certain things before Google and just have it give me the source. I use it to sum up huge documents to quickly analyze them before I go through them. Feels like how Google felt I when it first came out. Yall using the same ai?

(Apple ai is not what I’m talking about)

[–] RisingSwell@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 57 minutes ago

I've asked bing gpt to find me 4k laptops and it proceeded to list 5 laptops that weren't 4k. Asked for the heaviest Pokemon and it responded wailord which has never been correct. Had gpt (not bing) attempt to write an AHK script for me to have forwards and backwards media keys, it failed. I asked it to fix it, it said what was broken, why it didn't work and then fixed it by giving me the exact code that didnt work the first time.

It's consistently wrong to me so i now just skip it because if I haven't to double check everything it says anyway, I might as well just do the research myself.

[–] ScannerPlanner@lemmy.world 1 points 3 hours ago

I also use gen AI for coding assistance and have had an extremely positive experience, but I almost never use it on my smartphone

[–] Underwaterbob@lemm.ee 12 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

Not only that, but Google assistant is getting consistently less reliable. Like half the time now I ask it a question and it just does an image search or something or completely misunderstands me in some other manner. They deserted working, decent tech for unreliable, unwanted tech because ???

[–] LeninOnAPrayer@lemm.ee 6 points 6 hours ago* (last edited 6 hours ago) (2 children)

Profit potential. Think of AI as one big data collector to sell you shit. It is significantly better at learning things about you than any metadata or cookies ever could.

If you think of this AI push as "trying to make a better product" it will not make much sense. If you think of the AI push as "how do I collect more data on all my users and better directly influence their choices" it makes a lot more sense.

[–] bravesirrbn@lemmy.world 1 points 2 hours ago

I don't think the LLM spouting nonsense responses part actively contributes to collecting and learning about user data much. Regular search queries and other behaviors (click tracking etc) already do this well enough and have most likely been using loads of machine learning for many years now

[–] Underwaterbob@lemm.ee 3 points 5 hours ago

Well, that's depressing. Where's my Star Trek future?

[–] Redbranch1@lemmy.world 7 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

I planned to skip this generation, assuming this would be the year of useless ai cramming, even though my phone was getting old. Samsung was so desperate to sell s25s upgrading was essentially less than staying with my current model. Bought it, and turned all that mess off

[–] MutilationWave@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

I used it once. Told it to pretend to be a centaur from Mars and explain how centaur sex works. Pretty fucking funny, but yeah it was a one-off.

[–] astro_plane@lemm.ee 2 points 4 hours ago (2 children)

....so how does centaur sex work? Don't leave us hanging!

[–] MutilationWave@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago) (1 children)

So first off it spoke like a generic fantasy character with neighing here and there, I didn't think centaurs neighed given that they have a human mouth but whatever. It said it's just like horse sex but there's extra intimacy because of the human torsos. It also said something about the "power and wisdom of Mars".

[–] astro_plane@lemm.ee 3 points 3 hours ago

Amazing, I can finally to sleep now. I shall right this in my diary with great enthusiasm!

[–] Lifter@discuss.tchncs.de 3 points 4 hours ago (2 children)

And how does breast feeding work? Is it from the human tit or the horse tit?

[–] Sonor@lemmy.world 4 points 3 hours ago

finally somebody asking the real questions.

[–] MutilationWave@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 2 hours ago

I deleted the deepseek app, you're gonna have to ask.

[–] drmoose@lemmy.world 8 points 7 hours ago* (last edited 7 hours ago) (1 children)

Tbf most people have no clue how to use it nor even understand what "AI" even is.

I just taught my mom how to use circle to search and it's a real game changer for her. She can quickly lookup on-screen items (like plants shes reading about) from an image and the on-screen translation is incredible.

Also circle to search gets around link and text copy blocking giving you back the same freedoms you had on a PC.

Personally I'd never go back to a phone without circle to search - its so under-rated and a giant shift in smartphone capabilities.

Its very likely that we'll have full live screen reading assistants in the near future which can perform circle to search like functions and even visual modifications live. It's easy to dismiss this as a gimmick but there's a lot of incredible potential here especially for casual and older users.

[–] Hoimo@ani.social 2 points 3 hours ago

Google Lens already did that though, all you need is decent OCR and an image classification model (which is a precursor to the current "AI" hype, but actually useful).

load more comments
view more: next ›