this post was submitted on 03 Apr 2025
1256 points (96.8% liked)

Technology

68305 readers
4311 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] eugenevdebs@lemmy.dbzer0.com 29 points 9 hours ago (3 children)

More proof Rainbow Capitalism was a lie/ad campaign to take more money from queers.

I wish I could rub this in the face of every cishet who said Rainbow Capitalism was actual progress.

[–] InsincereLogic@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 8 hours ago

(For reference: I am cishet, but have family & friends in the LGBTQ+ community and consider myself an ally.) Usually just lurk, but I feel you so badly.

I've been saying it forever as well. They're spending millions, to specifically target/advertise/appeal to the community... out of the goodness of their hearts? Right.

Then as soon as its "over", the facade drops and its on to the next big event/target market. Rinse and repeat.

[–] zenforyen@feddit.org 6 points 8 hours ago

Haha absolutely, I'm also one of the people who always said all this rainbow and green washing is bullshit. As if they ever cared for anything.

Capitalism has no values, except for one: shareholder value. Yesterday they help sending people to concentration camps, today they help saving the world and increasing diversity, yeah, totally convincing.

There is one thing to rely on with capitalism - if you convince people you can make good money with it or it is good for the brand, they will jump onto it and squeeze the shit out of it. An abstract, amoral force, made from a large number of concrete shitty people.

[–] deepfuckingdumb@lemmy.world 3 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

I mean, in the past companies wouldn't be caught dead associating with LGBTQ+ people, let alone take their money. Now LGBTQ+ is acceptable enough for predatory advertising so...idk progress from like a fucked up capitalist perspective I guess?

[–] InsincereLogic@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 6 hours ago

Rainbow line must go up

[–] GoodOleAmerika@lemmy.world 24 points 10 hours ago (2 children)

Keep using uorigin for blocking as. Also use Firefox.

[–] lumony@lemmings.world 7 points 6 hours ago

Switch to AdNauseam.

It clicks ads in addition to blocking them.

[–] suite403@lemmy.world 9 points 10 hours ago (2 children)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] TemplaerDude@lemm.ee 29 points 11 hours ago (2 children)

They also allowed a pedo back on their platform

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] MasterReflection1916@lemm.ee 9 points 10 hours ago

Look at the latest executive order on "protecting children". They are planning for eugenics.

[–] HighFructoseLowStand@lemm.ee 95 points 15 hours ago (4 children)

It's almost impressive how quickly the whole of the business world capitulated to Donald Trump.

[–] menemen@lemmy.world 6 points 7 hours ago

They didn't capitulate. They never fought. They just did what was the best shot at earning money and gaining ground at the time.

Don't ever expect moral based behavior in capitalism or geopolitics.

[–] darthelmet@lemmy.world 48 points 11 hours ago (8 children)

It’s almost like their support for these issues was never genuine to begin with.

load more comments (8 replies)
[–] samus12345@lemm.ee 50 points 14 hours ago (2 children)

It's too hard to change anything, but only if it's progressive policies. Fascist policies can be implemented immediately.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Sizing2673@lemmy.world 22 points 12 hours ago

This is what's fucking shitty about this

Every company and every politician and every person who bends over so willingly IS THE PROBLEM

It's like they announce their regime and these idiots roll out the red carpets immediately ready be the first company to suck the government off

If they all stood their ground, it would buy more time

[–] diemartin@sh.itjust.works 58 points 14 hours ago (4 children)
[–] NotMyOldRedditName@lemmy.world 7 points 10 hours ago

If you don't use the strikeout, you can save millions of dollar on toner/ink from not printing out an extra word at a corpo that big. I think I deserve a promotion for that insight as well, well worth the extra money!

[–] samus12345@lemm.ee 25 points 14 hours ago* (last edited 14 hours ago)

Slavishly Follow the Fascist Government's Lead

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] carrion0409@lemm.ee 44 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

First reddit now youtube. Welcome to the tech broligarchy

[–] AnjunaSouls@lemmy.world 8 points 12 hours ago (2 children)

We need a good federated youtube replacement so badly...

[–] lukstru@lemmy.world 8 points 12 hours ago (3 children)

PeerTube isn’t bad, it just has no content

[–] Comtief@lemm.ee 2 points 8 hours ago

It seems so difficult to use though

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] nibble4bits@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 11 hours ago (3 children)

It's always a question of money. It costs money to make quality content. YouTube has content because they share ad revenue to their content providers. That expands the more popular the content is because there are more ads displayed. That revenue lets the creators expand their capabilities with better gear and stage sets. Federated networks usually depend initially on volunteers and alternative ways of earning revenue for those instances besides ads.

[–] menemen@lemmy.world 2 points 7 hours ago* (last edited 7 hours ago)

Tbh money could be the initiative. So many content creators nowadays have platforms beside YouTube. Often even self hosted weboages. If a federated alternative would come up, they could just set up an own server and keep all the earnings.

This would somehow need to get started though. No idea how.

[–] moonbunny@sh.itjust.works 3 points 9 hours ago

It’s even more difficult since the content has to be stored somewhere, and needs to be streamed which requires storage and processing power, with the latter needing to be able to scale so the user experience doesn’t get bogged down by new people joining.

The entire revenue model of compensating the host and content creator does require a rethink, but it’s hard to see how that could be done without paywalling access to host, view, and/or both of the above.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works 68 points 16 hours ago (2 children)

Man this whole anticipatory compliance with the fascist regime shit is fucking awful

[–] LucasWaffyWaf@lemmy.world 2 points 8 hours ago

It's like Roko's Basilisk playing out in real time, except instead of building a malignant computer out of fear it's accelerating a fascist takeover.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›