this post was submitted on 04 Apr 2025
173 points (98.3% liked)

Technology

68305 readers
4336 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

The controversial company, already notorious for amassing over 50 billion facial images scraped from social platforms, signed a contract in mid-2019 with Investigative Consultant, Inc. to acquire roughly 690 million arrest records and 390 million arrest photos from across all 50 U.S. states.

"The contract shows that Clearview was trying to get social security numbers, email addresses, home addresses, and other personal information along with the mugshots," said Jeramie Scott, Senior Counsel at the Electronic Privacy Information Center, or EPIC.

archive link

top 8 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] GnuLinuxDude@lemmy.ml 58 points 18 hours ago (3 children)

I wish for once this country could pass an unambiguously good law to protect people's privacy.

[–] Iheartcheese@lemmy.world 23 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

Best we can do is protecting guns

[–] Photuris@lemmy.ml 7 points 17 hours ago

And we don’t even use them effectively to protect our rights.

[–] Zorsith@lemmy.blahaj.zone 13 points 16 hours ago

Best we can do is require photo ID for porn.

[–] GrumpyDuckling@sh.itjust.works 5 points 15 hours ago

Illinois has a law against collecting biometric data.

[–] GluWu@lemm.ee 20 points 15 hours ago* (last edited 13 hours ago) (1 children)

If you've been inside a Walmart or target or many other major retailers in the last 5 years, you're already in the database.

Super cute edits:

“You’re already in the system, whether it is a system that involves a conviction, an arrest or being a member of the community on social media,” said local defense attorney “You’re part of that system, you’re part of that database, for better or for worse. You’re there.”

“The lack of laws and legislation is a bit troubling because we seem to need to catch up to a technology that’s way ahead of us,”

System startered in 2021

[–] OhVenus_Baby@lemmy.ml 7 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

Walmart alone is a scary good at this. They have dedicated teams towards facial and item theft recognition. They won't even report your theft until it reaches grand larceny they will simply tally the theft. Because there is no point in arresting a 20 dollar theft or having a case to prosecute with teams of lawyers.

[–] Fredthefishlord@lemmy.blahaj.zone 5 points 6 hours ago* (last edited 6 hours ago)

It should be a crime to gather that much data as a private entity

The whole "building a profile to sue people" would bother me a lot less if they weren't stealing from their own workers.