this post was submitted on 11 Apr 2025
783 points (99.2% liked)

News

28599 readers
4352 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

The commander of the base wrote, "I do not presume to understand current politics, but what I do know is the concerns of the US administration discussed by Vice-President Vance on Friday are not reflective of Pituffik Space Base." in an email and was thus dismissed. In dismissing her, the Pentagon stated this reason. "Actions [that] undermine the chain of command or to subvert President [Donald] Trump's agenda will not be tolerated at the Department of Defense."

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] TronBronson@lemmy.world 14 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Fragile Egos running the military great. Thousands may die but JD vance's feelings shall be protected at any cost. The party of "fuck your feelings" everyone.

[–] ChaoticEntropy@feddit.uk 8 points 1 day ago

Because a military operated solely by loyal incompetents has worked out so well for Russia.

[–] Melatonin@lemmy.dbzer0.com 70 points 2 days ago (7 children)

She is a patriot. Col Susannah Meyers deserves a medal, and I'm sure she would do 10,000x better as VP than the jerk we have now.

Vance seems smart, and obviously he married outside his "race" so somewhat open-minded. Which means he is acting out of pure conscienceless ambition. IMO worse than Trump, who is an evil idiot.

[–] psycho_driver@lemmy.world 14 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Maybe he married outside of his race because she's a hot piece of ass and out of his league and he didn't put much more consideration into it than that?

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)
[–] Jaysyn@lemmy.world 213 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (11 children)

JD Vance exudes weakness.

The patron saint of yes-men.

[–] Xtallll@lemmy.blahaj.zone 41 points 2 days ago (3 children)
load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (10 replies)
[–] tal@lemmy.today 189 points 2 days ago (3 children)

undermining

Prior to the base commander commenting and destroying his effort, Vance was on totally firm ground and had pretty much convinced the entire population of Greenland.

[–] Quilotoa@lemmy.ca 52 points 2 days ago
[–] duhbasser@lemm.ee 34 points 2 days ago (1 children)

As firm as a used sofa bed maybe

[–] TachyonTele@lemm.ee 15 points 2 days ago (2 children)
load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] peoplebeproblems@midwest.social 89 points 2 days ago (5 children)

-.-

Chain-of-command means orders come from your immediate superior doesn't it? Adding "Or to Subvert President Trump's agenda" pretty much nullifies that and by default makes our military on par with Russia's. Good weapons do fuck and all when not used as intended.

Putin must be laughing his ass off at how effectively he's destroying the US military without firing a single shot at it.

[–] Dasus@lemmy.world 59 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Putin must be laughing his ass off at how effectively he's destroying the US military without firing a single shot at it.

Yeah this. Very much.

Without Trump Putin would've been finished, but since Trumputler, Russia is still an actual danger to the world.

Russian disinfo is just so fking prevalent and idiots fall for it. And most people are idiots.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] JamesTBagg@lemmy.world 19 points 2 days ago (4 children)

That's not what chain of command means. It simply establishes the hierarchy. Commands can be given by anyone who outranks you, or holds a billet that comes with higher authority. Trump and Vance at the top of that chain and can issue legal orders to literally anyone in the US military.

[–] Notyou@sopuli.xyz 26 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Not that the rule of law matters, but the VP is not in the military chain of command. There is no vice commander-in-chief. It goes pres then his Chiefs of Staff/Generals.

Of course they could just lean on the undermining trumps agenda of stripping Greenland of its resources, but that's not why the base was there. Or I guess that is why it's there now.....idk.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] whiskeytango@lemm.ee 12 points 2 days ago (1 children)

They can issue orders. Not all are legal. But since they replaced the JAGs, this might be closer to reality.

[–] JamesTBagg@lemmy.world 12 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Hopefully they all remember their oaths of enlistment are to the Constitution first, THEN the president.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] KingPorkChop@lemmy.ca 11 points 2 days ago

Putin must be laughing his ass off at how effectively he’s destroying the US military without firing a single shot at it.

It's one for the books to be sure. Also there are a huge portion of Americans cheering it on because they're too stupid to know better.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Gates9@sh.itjust.works 96 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Replacing base commanders is very indicative of a potential military coup

[–] Dasus@lemmy.world 19 points 2 days ago (2 children)

May you live in interesting times

[–] SocialMediaRefugee@lemmy.world 17 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Too fucking interesting if you ask me

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] fossilesque@mander.xyz 142 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

I don't think it's a coincidence that they are a woman.

[–] MuskyMelon@lemmy.world 39 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Pshaw! What's a woman doing in space? Get rid of her! Also, let's get rid of those Sigourney Weaver DEI alien movies from the Library of Congress as well!

[–] postmateDumbass@lemmy.world 14 points 2 days ago (1 children)

They let women IN the library?

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] TheDeadlySquid@lemm.ee 106 points 2 days ago (5 children)

Another scapegoat in an otherwise ill conceived plan.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] MECHAGODZILLA2@midwest.social 58 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Surely this won’t do anything to undermine an already plummeting morale.

[–] M0oP0o@mander.xyz 17 points 2 days ago

Gotta have that rock bottom morale for the upcoming war with former allies.....

[–] werefreeatlast@lemmy.world 14 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] niva@discuss.tchncs.de 3 points 1 day ago

Not enough!

[–] Daggity@lemm.ee 56 points 2 days ago

Loyalty to trump takes precedence to the truth.

[–] LonstedBrowryBased@lemm.ee 37 points 2 days ago (2 children)

JD Vance is the biggest fucking pussy I have ever seen

He has neither the depth nor the warmth.

His loveseat does, though.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] sun_is_ra@sh.itjust.works 50 points 2 days ago (1 children)

can't Greenland ask to evacuate that American base? its clear the US won't try to help Greenland without having them paying a hefty price anyway

[–] Litebit@lemmy.world 26 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I think the base is more for US benefit than Greenland.

[–] sun_is_ra@sh.itjust.works 30 points 2 days ago (11 children)

Right but its their country so they should be able to clear the base if they desire

[–] FelixCress@lemmy.world 40 points 2 days ago

Say it to Cubans.

load more comments (10 replies)
[–] Dagwood222@lemm.ee 39 points 2 days ago (5 children)

https://youtu.be/Z7XRX1UBooQ?list=PLlwzDYw6zp2D6DxLR8zGz1i_7764DYSVQ

Old BBC series, 'I, Claudius.' History of the first five Roman Emperors, with Brian Blessed as Augustus and Patrick Stewart as an ambitious general.

Relevant because of Caligula. He didn't fall because he was a violent tyrant. He fell because he lost the support of the military.

Hopefully, Trump will miss that idea...

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] psycho_driver@lemmy.world 13 points 2 days ago

If the snowflake starts to melt his mascara might run.

[–] SendMePhotos@lemmy.world 22 points 2 days ago (1 children)

View 1: you should follow chain of command as a unified command is necessary for military operations. Any personnel going against the direction is counted as rogue. (benefits military)

View 2: Public Relations of the country you are in requires the ability to deescalate situations and unwind tension, thereby requiring the communication of separation. (benefits local units and local community)

View 3: moral obligations of one's self pushes you to do the right thing. (benefits self and possibly local unit)

In my opinion, I believe this was an action of view 2 and also happened to include view 3. But that's just like... My opinion.

[–] FlexibleToast@lemmy.world 18 points 2 days ago (1 children)

It's literally against the UCMJ to take part in political action as a uniformed member of the military. To me it sounds like she was trying to "cya" and of course, this administration has such thin skin that they couldn't have someone do that.

https://www.military.com/benefits/military-legal-matters/active-duty-military-participate-protests-make-political-statements.html

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] MuskyMelon@lemmy.world 16 points 2 days ago

*Behold the Underminer! I am always beneath you, but nothing is beneath me! I hereby declare war on peace and happiness! Soon, all will tremble before me! *

load more comments
view more: next ›