this post was submitted on 11 Apr 2025
618 points (99.0% liked)

politics

22813 readers
3072 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

“This crazy tariff war … like, the fact that nobody is questioning his mental acuity or fitness to serve is beyond wild to me, right?" said Rep. Jasmine Crockett, D-Tex., during a Thursday appearance on MSNBC’s “All In with Chris Hayes.”

“Like, the fact that they sat around, called Joe Biden ‘Sleepy Joe Biden’ … at least you could sleep at night because you didn’t have to worry about your 401(k) disappearing overnight," Crockett told Hayes.

“You didn’t have to worry about the cost of food just skyrocketing or skyrocketing costs of all of your electronics,” she said.

“Like, this is crazy work. For no reason.”

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] newthrowaway20@lemmy.world 4 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

“You didn’t have to worry about the cost of food just skyrocketing or skyrocketing costs of all of your electronics,” she said.

If she's referring to prices under Biden, then I don't agree with that. Part of why so many people voted for Trump is because of how Trump hammered home the inflation argument specifically with groceries.

It's a shame those people didn't realize Trump had no plans of helping with prices, and he was just using the issue as a wedge. But we can't pretend groceries didn't go up an insane amount under Biden. Now, was it Biden's fault? No, he inherited a crap show from Trump and did his best to stop the damage. But low information voters don't know that. they just know they started paying way more under Biden.

[–] orcrist@lemm.ee 6 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

I think you're misunderstanding the context. This is not criticizing voters who thought that candidate Trump was good. It's criticizing people who are not reacting strongly enough to Trump now.

[–] AugustWest@lemmy.world 4 points 7 hours ago

I don’t think they misunderstood the context. The user is saying that while the broader point she is making is correct, specifically saying we didn’t have to worry about grocery prices under Biden undermines the message.

[–] IndustryStandard@lemmy.world 1 points 7 hours ago

Every questions it.

[–] Sam_Bass@lemmy.world 1 points 7 hours ago

Fear. Just fear.

[–] grue@lemmy.world 25 points 15 hours ago (4 children)

Trump is not incompetent. Trump is not doing things by accident. Trump is not confused, or senile, or making mistakes.

Trump is destroying the United States KNOWINGLY, DELIBERATELY, AND ENTIRELY ON PURPOSE.

Rep. Crockett needs to quit naively giving him the benefit of the doubt, because the reality is way worse than she's even contemplating.

[–] orcrist@lemm.ee 5 points 7 hours ago

Actually, we have research on the quality of his speeches that shows his brain is not functioning the way it used to. There's no doubt that old age is getting to him. Remember the scene when he was dancing? That's not a man who is 100%.

But as you said, it sure looks like he's trying to do a lot of the horrible things that he is successfully doing. Why are you giving him the benefit of the doubt and assuming it's only malice when it sure looks like both malice and incompetence?

[–] vaultdweller013@sh.itjust.works 27 points 14 hours ago (2 children)

Hey now we know Reagan was more or less senile by his second term and he was still very much a bastard. Multiple things can be true at the same time.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] TankovayaDiviziya@lemmy.world 3 points 10 hours ago

Thank you for saying this. People are gradually sobering up that Trump and co. know what they are doing. For many years, people are insulting him as dumb. But would a dumb person not be elected twice into the world's most powerful position? If he is dumb, who is the one wielding the power right now? Who is the one lording over us right now? There is the ongoing notion that the concept of intelligence means being smart in broad cognitive aspects. But academics are re-evaluating what intelligence means because we can clearly see that everyone being good at specific things, but not so with the others. Can we call a successful rich banker dumb for being bad at biology and vice versa? A demagogue may not know what "transgenic" means, but he certainly knows what levers to pull to incite the base emotions of voters into supporting him/her. That takes certain skills.

I would still laugh if someone tries to dismiss Trump as "dumb" even after these comments. The principles of Sun Tsu's "Art of War" can still be conceptually applied into everyday life, and one of the key tenets is to never underestimate your opponent. Keep calling Trump dumb, but who is the one in charge right now? Sure, his government policies are irrational amd harm everyone else, but not to himself and his cronies. He just performed insider trading in last two days after all. That still takes certain skills that most of us can't do.

[–] Knock_Knock_Lemmy_In@lemmy.world 2 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

Is Trump calling the shots?

I'd say yes, but I'd like to analyse the source of his policies. Who really wanted to play the tariff game?

[–] metallic_substance@lemmy.world 2 points 7 hours ago

Who really wanted to play the tariff game?

Hint: Владимир Путин

[–] wagesj45@fedia.io 128 points 22 hours ago (3 children)

WE HAVE BEEN. But we need the people in power to push this, not just us plebs on the internet!

[–] dota__2@lemmy.world 26 points 22 hours ago

partisan politics means that dem words mean fuck all. there needs to be full throated commentary by the fourth estate. alas it's just a branch of the republicans now.

[–] Geetnerd@lemmy.world 4 points 17 hours ago

Well, we keep seeing articles about former blind loyalty voters now regretting their Mad King elimination their former rock solid Gubmint Jobs.

They only care when it hurts them, or their family, personally.

Too late, too bad, so sad.

[–] Fredselfish@lemmy.world 6 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

Please the tariff war was stage. He bragging just how much billionaire made off of it. It's only us not on in who suffered. That not dementia that trumps handlers using him to make themselves richer.

[–] Geetnerd@lemmy.world 7 points 17 hours ago

It was a blatant, childish, obvious shakedown fantasy.

We all know Trump thinks he's a Mafia Don. The sad thing is he's the most powerful person in the world.

This would be satire in a sane world.

[–] HawlSera@lemm.ee 15 points 17 hours ago

One thing I'm weirdly used to is Republicans getting away with murder but how dare a Democrat wear a tan suit.

[–] Freshparsnip@lemm.ee 16 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

If someone asked me, I'd have told them Trump was mentally and morally unfit to be president

[–] cyphear@lemm.ee 3 points 10 hours ago

Wasn't there a time where a married man got a blow job in the oval office and people got very upset? Seems like morals didn't mean shit to the side that pushes "family values" and their idea of "morality." The conservatives nowadays remind of the dad in Moral Orel.

[–] frustrated_phagocytosis@fedia.io 25 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

It's because he's a spiteful sociopath who enjoys the suffering of those he considers lesser beings. Basically everyone not a current dictator. He also thrives on sycophants lavishing him with attention and praise, and has successfully chased off anyone who might have questioned his megalomania. We can only hope he has a medical emergency and dies like Stalin because no one is willing to make him go to a hospital.

[–] Geetnerd@lemmy.world 3 points 17 hours ago

It's called narcissism.

[–] harmsy@lemmy.world 4 points 16 hours ago

I've been wondering this since "God bless the United Shaishh!" and "COVFEFE"

[–] Brkdncr@lemmy.world 15 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

This lady is a great representative and is fun to listen to.

[–] Gerudo@lemm.ee 3 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

A shining gem here in the shithole called Texas. We need more like her.

[–] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 3 points 15 hours ago

It's odd. when democrats were pulling out all the stops to prop up coathanger cuellar, the reason given was that a progressive can't win in texas.

cuellar just voted with republicans to disenfranchise millions. Like a good centrist, he aspires to capitulate to republicans' slightest whim.

[–] ptz@dubvee.org 19 points 23 hours ago* (last edited 23 hours ago) (7 children)

“Like, the fact that they sat around, called Joe Biden ‘Sleepy Joe Biden' ...

This account is my last vestige of social media, so I don't have much to compare against, but weren't the bulk (all?) of the "[Adjective] Joe" accounts just straight up shills? I know I blocked most of them because they were single-issue, one-trick pony accounts, but I haven't seen the first one since the election. And not a peep of "[Adjective] Trump" from any of that particular peanut gallery, either.

I forgot where I was going with this, but I guess my point is that if we're lucky enough to have another election, and you see a bunch of single-issue accounts come out of the woodworks, maybe just block the fuck out of them, yeah?

[–] Zaktor@sopuli.xyz 16 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

You blocked them and now you're using the fact that you don't see similar posts from the people you say you've blocked to justify that your blocks were correct?

[–] eugenevdebs@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 19 hours ago

"I blocked the accounts I found annoying. Now I don't see them, so I can't see what they say now. Ergo, now they're completely in support!"

They're not sending their best, folks.

[–] gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works 2 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

Ngl one of the reasons I stick around this place as my final social media vestige is that there tends to be a lot of people who - and I mean this respectfully - are suspiciously similar to my own mind

[–] vaultdweller013@sh.itjust.works 1 points 14 hours ago

Do you crave the taste of long pork too?

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] null_dot@lemmy.dbzer0.com 14 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

I wonder why no one questions the volume of executive orders this guy issues.

I know I'm pointing out the obvious here but it's authoritarian. As in you don't need a cabinet of people representing their constituents and developing policies and laws and deciding on the best way forward, you just have this one self-obsessed idiot making it up.

[–] Boddhisatva@lemmy.world 16 points 22 hours ago

I wonder why no one questions the volume of executive orders this guy issues.

I'm right there with you. Particularly in light of this tweet...

[–] lupusblackfur@lemmy.world 14 points 21 hours ago

Because they're too busy wetting their pants and/or browning their noses in fear of the Almighty Mafia Don Mangolini.

R's and D's (with the exception of very few) have completely abdicated their authority to the "Saved by God to Save the Country" King.

Losers, cowards, and sycophants all.

A third party in US is so sorely needed. But can't see any third party being given a chance/shot.

We are fucked.

🤷‍♂️ 🤦‍♀️ 🖕 🖕

[–] KillingTimeItself@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

hi, liberal here, we've been wondering this same thing since day one.

Curious why nobody is questioning it in the media.

[–] asteriskeverything@lemmy.world 2 points 16 hours ago

You're literally commenting on a post where they are finally questioning it in the media.

Maybe you meant sooner cuz yes, fuck yeah

[–] Manmoth@lemmy.ml 2 points 16 hours ago

TV, blogs, podcasts, streamers etc etc question everything about Donald Trump all the time.

[–] Manmoth@lemmy.ml 2 points 16 hours ago (2 children)
[–] kofe@lemmy.world 1 points 12 hours ago

Dementia doesn't follow a linear decline. He could have good days and worse days

[–] datendefekt@feddit.org 1 points 13 hours ago

While he does paint a quieter, more sympathetic image of Trump, it sounded less "mentally acute" and more just vibing along.

But WGAF about how nice Trump is in person if he cosplays as a crazy dictator in public, manipulating the market, destroying international trade and terrorizing the citizens?

[–] resipsaloquitur@lemm.ee 8 points 22 hours ago

To be fair, no one accused Trump of being smart. Or even competent.

load more comments
view more: next ›