this post was submitted on 11 Apr 2025
687 points (99.1% liked)

politics

22829 readers
3684 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

“This crazy tariff war … like, the fact that nobody is questioning his mental acuity or fitness to serve is beyond wild to me, right?" said Rep. Jasmine Crockett, D-Tex., during a Thursday appearance on MSNBC’s “All In with Chris Hayes.”

“Like, the fact that they sat around, called Joe Biden ‘Sleepy Joe Biden’ … at least you could sleep at night because you didn’t have to worry about your 401(k) disappearing overnight," Crockett told Hayes.

“You didn’t have to worry about the cost of food just skyrocketing or skyrocketing costs of all of your electronics,” she said.

“Like, this is crazy work. For no reason.”

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] sfu@lemm.ee 1 points 5 hours ago

Um, not defending trump, but the cost of everything did go up under biden. Anyone buy groceries over the past four years? And anyone saying trump isn't mentally stable, and then acts as if biden was, isn't being honest.

[–] captainlezbian@lemmy.world 6 points 17 hours ago* (last edited 17 hours ago) (1 children)

The king is stark both in his nakedness and his raving madness. We know it. But it's like climate change, you point it out and an unreasonable number of people act like you're the crazy one.

So yes, an insane, demented, and cruel man was elected president and all but declared himself king. And lest we find ourselves a Brutus, whether of the styling of Marcus Junius Brutus or of Lucius Junius Brutus, or the senate decides to declare a republic or we do as the Benghazians did to their mad king of Ghaddafi, or we antagonize the world to the point of being liberated… we're at an impasse.

The mad king demands we all suffer, that some of us die, and that we burn every resource our future holds. And if we do not he will rage at us and his court of cruelty will attack those who resist.

[–] ericatty@infosec.pub 2 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

Then you've got Bill Maher meeting him in person and then dick-riding him on his show talking about how sane, charming, self-deprecating, and how he has a sense of humor afterall, and listens to criticism calmly.

Then Maher gets offended when a guest says 'the president played you'

I mean, jfc, Maher is in the entertainment industry how has he never met a charming backstabber before?

I just read that DOGE literally manhandled and dragged a career Social Security worker out of the offices because he wouldn't let let put alive people on the dead people list to cut off their benefits.

Sane/Insane - the work they are doing is crazy, illegal, immoral, unethical - we need more Jasmine Crockett type people loudly calling this out.

We need people with her visibility and charisma out-shouting Margie with actual truths instead of made up bullshit.

At this point the truths are more wacky than the hacky shit being made up about space lasers and weather control.

[–] captainlezbian@lemmy.world 1 points 15 hours ago

Of course Maher got on board with him. He loves anyone with whom he can agree their shared farts smell of roses. Sigh…

[–] Scott_of_the_Arctic@lemmy.world 4 points 16 hours ago

Because Vance is arguably worse than Trump.

[–] spicystraw@lemmy.world 1 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

Lady, wtf do you mean we have not been questioning? Have you seen what dude has been doing for the last few weeks alone??

I really hope she is just bating other profile politions to speak up, otherwise this is just plain stupid.

[–] KelvarIW@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

I'm certain she is. Jasmine Crockett is the same lady who told Trump to "stop being Putin's ho". She told Musk to "Fuck off". She's an outspoken progressive. She's trying to spur the Democrats and non-MAGA Republicans into action.

[–] spicystraw@lemmy.world 1 points 4 hours ago

Then she is doing a wonderful job of it!

[–] wagesj45@fedia.io 141 points 2 days ago (3 children)

WE HAVE BEEN. But we need the people in power to push this, not just us plebs on the internet!

[–] dota__2@lemmy.world 29 points 2 days ago

partisan politics means that dem words mean fuck all. there needs to be full throated commentary by the fourth estate. alas it's just a branch of the republicans now.

[–] Fredselfish@lemmy.world 8 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Please the tariff war was stage. He bragging just how much billionaire made off of it. It's only us not on in who suffered. That not dementia that trumps handlers using him to make themselves richer.

[–] Geetnerd@lemmy.world 7 points 2 days ago

It was a blatant, childish, obvious shakedown fantasy.

We all know Trump thinks he's a Mafia Don. The sad thing is he's the most powerful person in the world.

This would be satire in a sane world.

[–] Geetnerd@lemmy.world 4 points 2 days ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Well, we keep seeing articles about former blind loyalty voters now regretting their Mad King eliminating their former rock solid Gubmint Jobs.

They only care when it hurts them, or their family, personally.

Too late, too bad, so sad.

[–] grue@lemmy.world 27 points 2 days ago (5 children)

Trump is not incompetent. Trump is not doing things by accident. Trump is not confused, or senile, or making mistakes.

Trump is destroying the United States KNOWINGLY, DELIBERATELY, AND ENTIRELY ON PURPOSE.

Rep. Crockett needs to quit naively giving him the benefit of the doubt, because the reality is way worse than she's even contemplating.

[–] vaultdweller013@sh.itjust.works 31 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Hey now we know Reagan was more or less senile by his second term and he was still very much a bastard. Multiple things can be true at the same time.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] orcrist@lemm.ee 6 points 1 day ago

Actually, we have research on the quality of his speeches that shows his brain is not functioning the way it used to. There's no doubt that old age is getting to him. Remember the scene when he was dancing? That's not a man who is 100%.

But as you said, it sure looks like he's trying to do a lot of the horrible things that he is successfully doing. Why are you giving him the benefit of the doubt and assuming it's only malice when it sure looks like both malice and incompetence?

[–] TankovayaDiviziya@lemmy.world 4 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Thank you for saying this. People are gradually sobering up that Trump and co. know what they are doing. For many years, people are insulting him as dumb. But would a dumb person not be elected twice into the world's most powerful position? If he is dumb, who is the one wielding the power right now? Who is the one lording over us right now? There is the ongoing notion that the concept of intelligence means being smart in broad cognitive aspects. But academics are re-evaluating what intelligence means because we can clearly see that everyone being good at specific things, but not so with the others. Can we call a successful rich banker dumb for being bad at biology and vice versa? A demagogue may not know what "transgenic" means, but he certainly knows what levers to pull to incite the base emotions of voters into supporting him/her. That takes certain skills.

I would still laugh if someone tries to dismiss Trump as "dumb" even after these comments. The principles of Sun Tsu's "Art of War" can still be conceptually applied into everyday life, and one of the key tenets is to never underestimate your opponent. Keep calling Trump dumb, but who is the one in charge right now? Sure, his government policies are irrational amd harm everyone else, but not to himself and his cronies. He just performed insider trading in last two days after all. That still takes certain skills that most of us can't do.

[–] opus86@lemmy.today 2 points 6 hours ago

Trump golfs on the weekends with his buddies. I bet he just does what his golf buddies tell him to. The fact that we don't know who those people are is not good.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] HawlSera@lemm.ee 15 points 2 days ago

One thing I'm weirdly used to is Republicans getting away with murder but how dare a Democrat wear a tan suit.

[–] frustrated_phagocytosis@fedia.io 25 points 2 days ago (1 children)

It's because he's a spiteful sociopath who enjoys the suffering of those he considers lesser beings. Basically everyone not a current dictator. He also thrives on sycophants lavishing him with attention and praise, and has successfully chased off anyone who might have questioned his megalomania. We can only hope he has a medical emergency and dies like Stalin because no one is willing to make him go to a hospital.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Freshparsnip@lemm.ee 16 points 2 days ago (1 children)

If someone asked me, I'd have told them Trump was mentally and morally unfit to be president

[–] cyphear@lemm.ee 3 points 2 days ago

Wasn't there a time where a married man got a blow job in the oval office and people got very upset? Seems like morals didn't mean shit to the side that pushes "family values" and their idea of "morality." The conservatives nowadays remind of the dad in Moral Orel.

[–] ptz@dubvee.org 19 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (3 children)

“Like, the fact that they sat around, called Joe Biden ‘Sleepy Joe Biden' ...

This account is my last vestige of social media, so I don't have much to compare against, but weren't the bulk (all?) of the "[Adjective] Joe" accounts just straight up shills? I know I blocked most of them because they were single-issue, one-trick pony accounts, but I haven't seen the first one since the election. And not a peep of "[Adjective] Trump" from any of that particular peanut gallery, either.

I forgot where I was going with this, but I guess my point is that if we're lucky enough to have another election, and you see a bunch of single-issue accounts come out of the woodworks, maybe just block the fuck out of them, yeah?

[–] Zaktor@sopuli.xyz 17 points 2 days ago (1 children)

You blocked them and now you're using the fact that you don't see similar posts from the people you say you've blocked to justify that your blocks were correct?

[–] eugenevdebs@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 2 days ago

"I blocked the accounts I found annoying. Now I don't see them, so I can't see what they say now. Ergo, now they're completely in support!"

They're not sending their best, folks.

[–] Tolookah@discuss.tchncs.de 5 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Delusional don? Terminal trump? Tornado trump?

[–] snausagesinablanket@lemmy.world 10 points 2 days ago (2 children)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Geetnerd@lemmy.world 3 points 2 days ago

Orange Julius.

[–] gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works 3 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Ngl one of the reasons I stick around this place as my final social media vestige is that there tends to be a lot of people who - and I mean this respectfully - are suspiciously similar to my own mind

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Brkdncr@lemmy.world 15 points 2 days ago (2 children)

This lady is a great representative and is fun to listen to.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] newthrowaway20@lemmy.world 5 points 2 days ago (1 children)

“You didn’t have to worry about the cost of food just skyrocketing or skyrocketing costs of all of your electronics,” she said.

If she's referring to prices under Biden, then I don't agree with that. Part of why so many people voted for Trump is because of how Trump hammered home the inflation argument specifically with groceries.

It's a shame those people didn't realize Trump had no plans of helping with prices, and he was just using the issue as a wedge. But we can't pretend groceries didn't go up an insane amount under Biden. Now, was it Biden's fault? No, he inherited a crap show from Trump and did his best to stop the damage. But low information voters don't know that. they just know they started paying way more under Biden.

[–] orcrist@lemm.ee 7 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I think you're misunderstanding the context. This is not criticizing voters who thought that candidate Trump was good. It's criticizing people who are not reacting strongly enough to Trump now.

[–] AugustWest@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago

I don’t think they misunderstood the context. The user is saying that while the broader point she is making is correct, specifically saying we didn’t have to worry about grocery prices under Biden undermines the message.

[–] lupusblackfur@lemmy.world 14 points 2 days ago

Because they're too busy wetting their pants and/or browning their noses in fear of the Almighty Mafia Don Mangolini.

R's and D's (with the exception of very few) have completely abdicated their authority to the "Saved by God to Save the Country" King.

Losers, cowards, and sycophants all.

A third party in US is so sorely needed. But can't see any third party being given a chance/shot.

We are fucked.

🤷‍♂️ 🤦‍♀️ 🖕 🖕

[–] null_dot@lemmy.dbzer0.com 14 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I wonder why no one questions the volume of executive orders this guy issues.

I know I'm pointing out the obvious here but it's authoritarian. As in you don't need a cabinet of people representing their constituents and developing policies and laws and deciding on the best way forward, you just have this one self-obsessed idiot making it up.

[–] Boddhisatva@lemmy.world 16 points 2 days ago

I wonder why no one questions the volume of executive orders this guy issues.

I'm right there with you. Particularly in light of this tweet...

[–] resipsaloquitur@lemm.ee 8 points 2 days ago

To be fair, no one accused Trump of being smart. Or even competent.

[–] harmsy@lemmy.world 4 points 2 days ago

I've been wondering this since "God bless the United Shaishh!" and "COVFEFE"

[–] KillingTimeItself@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 2 days ago (2 children)

hi, liberal here, we've been wondering this same thing since day one.

Curious why nobody is questioning it in the media.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›