this post was submitted on 19 Sep 2023
181 points (97.4% liked)

Work Reform

13937 readers
216 users here now

A place to discuss positive changes that can make work more equitable, and to vent about current practices. We are NOT against work; we just want the fruits of our labor to be recognized better.

Our Philosophies:

Our Goals

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
(page 2) 36 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] rockSlayer@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago

Fuck yea, love to see militant labor fighting for what they need

[–] SinningStromgald@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago

I like this Shawn. I really do. He's saying the words and doing the actions. Go Shawn! Go!

[–] MrCharles@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

That... is a very...VERY BAD IDEA.

Billionaires have enough money to survive an economic crash without batting an eyelid. Do you?

[–] Maggoty@lemmy.world 0 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Most billionaires aren't billionaires in cash. If the market crashes, so do they. Now they might be reduced to "only" a hundred million or so but that can be catastrophic when your personal finances depend on billions in stock backing up a series of long term rotating loans.

They wanted to use the market to exploit the people. But that makes them vulnerable in a way rich people didn't used to be vulnerable.

[–] Gerula@lemmy.world -1 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

Yeah, but that "catastrophe" you and I won't see it. We would have died already out of hunger or disease. You cannot survive only on hate itself.

Edit: typo

[–] Maggoty@lemmy.world 0 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Eh, when food gets scarce there's a few ways things can go. Usually the people in charge try to stop those kind of extreme events by handing out food. It's when there's a dust bowl at the same time that things get nasty.

[–] Gerula@lemmy.world -1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Yeah, go ahead and think you can live on handouts from the rich and powerful, whose economy you're trying to wreck.

[–] Maggoty@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

That's uhh not how real life works. It ain't a story where morality (yours or mine) matters. Hungry humans get very desperate and has been the cause of more than one period of extreme violence. That's why people get fed when governments can do it. Not because of any sense of charity.

[–] Gerula@lemmy.world -1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

In a wrecked economy the government can't do it. Because the government is not a magical entity. Then what?

[–] Maggoty@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

The government is more real than the economy. It's made of actual people doing actual things. In a total economic collapse but with a good food supply government ration stamps become the new form of pay. Again. This has happened before. They can't wave a magic wand but they can physically work together in their pre-existing hierarchy.

[–] Gerula@lemmy.world -1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

You have no ideea what are you talking about!

A good food supply means a working economy, for gods sake!

You need seeds, water for irrigation, fertilizers, tractors, various attachments to them, trucks, fuel, silos, for storin, dedicated plants and educated people to build and maintain everything. And I haven't reached animal husbandry or food processing!

Or you would argue that we all do subsistence agriculture because then I have a very bad news for you. Where to many for ineficient low yield agriculture and even if this wasn't a problem,many, like you, don't know how to do it.

[–] Maggoty@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Well no because subsistence farming is the exact opposite of government distribution.

You are aware that none of that stuff magically disappears right? It might disappear from an accounts book but it still physically exists. I really don't know how else to put this to you but the labor, equipment, and human experience don't just poof when the economy crashes. It's all still there waiting to be used. If it wasn't then we'd have died out a long time ago. The economy is an ephemeral concept thought up by humans. The stock market doesn't make the grain grow.

[–] Gerula@lemmy.world -1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Well kid, it's funny that your ideea it's not applicable only if it's sapping resources created beforehand. So is a net consumer not producer. In comunist terms it's a "parasite on the workers class".

There are some key concepts you're not grasping and you should educate yourself for your own good. Things like:

  • economy is much more than a stock market.
  • producing good and services that people require is the economy itself.
  • politics doesn't create anything (regardless of the ideology) it suppose to find the best way to manage what has been created by the economy and society.
  • the reliability of a system is inversely proportional with its complexity. In other words things break more complex things have bigger chances to break.
[–] Maggoty@lemmy.world 0 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

I didn't say politics. I said government. The people doing this kind of work will do it no matter which party is in office. And they are out there right now somewhere in the world doing it already. And if you want to cast the whole of production and distribution as "the economy" then it would take an asteroid, super volcano, or zombie plague to stop it. We aren't talking about everyone just doing nothing and you know it. People are still going to harvest food. Truck drivers are still going to drive their trucks. The method of pay just changes.

Saying the economy isn't just the stock market when the economy crashing is solely defined by the stock market going down is fucking hilarious.

[–] Gerula@lemmy.world 0 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I said what I had to say it's time to carry on. Good luck!

[–] jerkface@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 year ago

You could have found more respectful ways to say them.

[–] ronflex@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago

Where do I sign up

[–] A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world 0 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Why not? Megacorps and billionaires wreck the economy all the time, and exploit it for their favor.

Why not let the poor and worker class wreck it for once.

Set the whole goddamn thing on fire, and throw the rich into it.

[–] JoJoGAH@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago

Maybe we can get the gd bailout for once? Call it payback on their overdue loans?

[–] trailing9@lemmy.ml -1 points 2 years ago (13 children)

Controversial: how can illegal immigrants send money home but regular workers live paycheck to paycheck?

Rent would be cheaper if renters would unionize and wouldn't spend above an agreed on limit.

It's so hard to coordinate that only some workers can ask billionaires for better deals. Why? Why is not everybody ashamed that they cannot coordinate with their neighbors?

Roman's walked out of town once a year to remind the elite of their value. The west models itself after the Roman Republic but tries to skip on the hard parts.

load more comments (13 replies)
[–] Dra@lemmy.zip -1 points 2 years ago (2 children)

The amount of well meaning idiots upvoting this who dont seem to grasp who actually suffers when this happens is depressing.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] intensely_human@lemm.ee -2 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Right, the economy isn't something that supports the life of all humans. Billionaires have yachts so it must only be working for them. And since only billionaires benefit from the economy, we can wreck it no problem. There won't be deaths from starvation and exposure, because food and housing aren't part of the economy we're going to wreck.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›