this post was submitted on 19 Sep 2023
177 points (97.3% liked)

Work Reform

11859 readers
112 users here now

A place to discuss positive changes that can make work more equitable, and to vent about current practices. We are NOT against work; we just want the fruits of our labor to be recognized better.

Our Philosophies:

Our Goals

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
(page 2) 32 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] NigelFrobisher@aussie.zone 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Only problem with this is that this doesn’t even hurt the ultra rich - every catastrophe is just a new investment opportunity for them. E.g. after Brexit they just moved their money and businesses out of the UK, leaving the poor schlebs who live there to deal with it.

[–] MrBusiness@lemmy.zip 0 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Okay, let's do nothing then... /s

[–] Jake_Farm@sopuli.xyz 0 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

That is something I wonder about. Inflation makes the poor poorer but when asked, economists are like "trust us, inflation is good".

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] MrCharles@lemmy.world 0 points 2 years ago (1 children)

That... is a very...VERY BAD IDEA.

Billionaires have enough money to survive an economic crash without batting an eyelid. Do you?

[–] Maggoty@lemmy.world 0 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Most billionaires aren't billionaires in cash. If the market crashes, so do they. Now they might be reduced to "only" a hundred million or so but that can be catastrophic when your personal finances depend on billions in stock backing up a series of long term rotating loans.

They wanted to use the market to exploit the people. But that makes them vulnerable in a way rich people didn't used to be vulnerable.

[–] Gerula@lemmy.world -1 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

Yeah, but that "catastrophe" you and I won't see it. We would have died already out of hunger or disease. You cannot survive only on hate itself.

Edit: typo

[–] Maggoty@lemmy.world 0 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Eh, when food gets scarce there's a few ways things can go. Usually the people in charge try to stop those kind of extreme events by handing out food. It's when there's a dust bowl at the same time that things get nasty.

[–] Gerula@lemmy.world -1 points 2 years ago (9 children)

Yeah, go ahead and think you can live on handouts from the rich and powerful, whose economy you're trying to wreck.

load more comments (9 replies)
[–] Dra@lemmy.zip -1 points 2 years ago (2 children)

The amount of well meaning idiots upvoting this who dont seem to grasp who actually suffers when this happens is depressing.

[–] unfreeradical@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago

Perhaps the "well meaning idiots" are wise enough to realize how much they will suffer unless "this happens".

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] trailing9@lemmy.ml -1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Controversial: how can illegal immigrants send money home but regular workers live paycheck to paycheck?

Rent would be cheaper if renters would unionize and wouldn't spend above an agreed on limit.

It's so hard to coordinate that only some workers can ask billionaires for better deals. Why? Why is not everybody ashamed that they cannot coordinate with their neighbors?

Roman's walked out of town once a year to remind the elite of their value. The west models itself after the Roman Republic but tries to skip on the hard parts.

[–] unfreeradical@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago (12 children)

how can illegal immigrants send money home but regular workers live paycheck to paycheck?

Migrants are not sending money to strangers in their home countries. They are supporting families, just the same as those who are not migrants and live with their families.

load more comments (12 replies)
[–] intensely_human@lemm.ee -2 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Right, the economy isn't something that supports the life of all humans. Billionaires have yachts so it must only be working for them. And since only billionaires benefit from the economy, we can wreck it no problem. There won't be deaths from starvation and exposure, because food and housing aren't part of the economy we're going to wreck.

[–] unfreeradical@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

I am sorry you missed the theme. Please let me help.

The objective is to build an economy that supports everyone being well fed and well housed, instead of the very few hoarding rockets, jets, yachts, and multiple homes, while many more remain unfed and unhoused.

[–] StopJoiningWars@discuss.online -5 points 9 months ago

The "economy" will exist whether it's a capitalist system or something else. Blaming the system is a stupid take when it's the actors within it causing the issues you complain about.

It's like blaming gravity.

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›