politics
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
Elon wishes to be Emperor of Mankind.
His heresy must fail.
Retweeted by the official White House account.
I wonder what all of his Protestant Evangelical backers think of this.
My eschatology is a bit rusty, but I think this is the type of thing that they thought the Antichrist would do. But maybe that's why the evangelicals back him, thinking the rapture is just around the corner....
(Or maybe, the "rapture" is happening right now, except instead of the chosen, worthy people being disappeared to Heaven, they're all being disappeared to El Salvador. The joke's on all those evangelicals, I guess. Ha.)
Edited to add: Doesn't "El Salvador" literally translate to "The Savior"? Kidnapping the innocent and whisking them to "The Savior", never to be seen again, definitely tracks.
Just to note: these books are heavily based on dispensationalist pseudo-theology.
But I agree that trump is an Antichrist
100% agreed on the pseudo-theology. Left Behind is a terrible series.
I just find it funny, because he acts like Carpathia. Like, Carpathia is characterized as smart and charismatic, but nothing in the writing backs that up - it relies heavily on some sort of magical attraction. Which is got to be the only way that you can explain how conservative Christians who have spent the last 50 years shrieking about sexual morality have latched onto this guy like he’s the Second Coming if you believe any of this shit. (The real answer of course, is that opposition to LGBT people was on the whole not religiously motivated, just “we don’t like the icky people.”)
Thank you for this link; it has made my day immeasurably more entertaining.
Fred Clark is the kind of Christian that got me out of my “angry Reddit atheist” phase. He’s a great writer.
That's all from those books, right? I haven't read them.
But I do know that Trump likes Golden Toilets, and has made his own crypto shitcoin. So maybe he is the Shitty Antichrist?
He’s already got a few golden statues.
It’s not like he’s shared AI videos of his imagined Gaza resort.
Can’t wait until he and Bibi team up to build the new Temple, and freedom loving patriots sign up to get their Neurolink chip in their right hand or forehead…
"Evangelical", when I was a kid, meant "racist who is mega devoted to the Bible and goes to church twice a week, and maybe doesn't apply enough critical thinking to what the preacher says." They'd know Bible quotes, ask themselves what Jesus would do, and although I completely disagreed with them and fled the state I lived in ASAP, they were coming from a sincere place.
Evangelical", today, is purely a statement of political alignment with MAGA. Most don't even go to church. They're literally willing to worship a golden idol.
Dude is literally the antichrist
Do we talk about ridding ourselves of the antichrist or would that be “uncivil” and “inciting violence?”
Arguably the Antipope (or would be, if he decides to keep pushing this '''joke''' like he has with the conquering Canada crap...)
This is so insane
Do it. Become pope.
US Constitution, Article I, Section 9, Clause 8:
No Title of Nobility shall be granted by the United States: And no Person holding any Office of Profit or Trust under them, shall, without the Consent of the Congress, accept of any present, Emolument, Office, or Title, of any kind whatever, from any King, Prince, or foreign State.
No more presidency for you, dumbass.
(but then again, the constitution doesn't seem to matter any more so what do I know 🤷♂️)
without the Consent of the Congress
I don't see the problem, Congress wil consent to anything, let him do anything; he could grab them right by the legislativussy
legislativussy
Congrussy 💀
Trump has been in flagrant violation of the 'emoluments' part of that section for the entirety of his presidency — both terms.
Guess what consequences he faced for that. Go on, guess!
without the Consent of Congress
They'd just give their consent, and we'd still be in "not quite a constitutional crisis" we've been in since he took office.
This is a flex. It means “watch me insult the largest Christian organization on earth with literally no consequences. My base’s support won’t budge and the rest of you cowards will continue to take it.” Has nothing to do with the pope or being the pope- it’s just another demoralization tactic.
lol what a loser
The guy bankrupts everything he touches. Go ahead, take down the church.
Hey Texas, a political meme is using AI to push an agenda. You going to do something about it?
They literally live by the phrase, "come and take it." No, they won't do shit.
This guy is so crass and so gormless he doesn't hesitate for one second to spit in the face of 1.5bn Catholics in the world.
Having said that, I wouldn't mind a picture of Trump as a dead Pope...
Catholics (in America at least) would happily let him spit in their faces, as long as he continues to make abortions harder to get. Never mind the fact that the Church is equally against the death penalty, or treating migrants like cattle....
American catholics are very different to european catholics. Not that european catholics are good, but compared to the US version they are outright progressive.
He's going to pull a Henry VIII and make a state sanctioned version of Christianity called the Church of America, isn't he.
You know, that would make a lot of sense with his “we need to forget about the separation of church and state” comments.
We’ll just have public schools which have a state sponsored religion, which acknowledges our great hero - an instrument of god himself.
What number of felonies would it have taken to call Obama a “son of lawlessness?”
Would love to see this honestly. You'll see at least a couple of million come over instantly.
This guy can’t be serious.
ONLY the TRUE Chosen One Of God would DO something like THAT! Now I'm even MORE CONVINCED Convicted Fraudster and Rapist and Thrice Married Billionaire Donald John Trump is GODS SON!
Ok I ate the onion on this one.
For the love of all that is actually holy, I hope they excommunicate his ass.
He’s not Catholic. JD Vance supposedly is.
Trump claims to be a non denominational Christian.
“Well, I think many. I mean, you know, when we get into the Bible, I think many. So many,” he responded. “And some people—look, an eye for an eye, you can almost say that. That’s not a particularly nice thing. But you know, if you look at what’s happening to our country, I mean, when you see what’s going on with our country, how people are taking advantage of us, and how they scoff at us and laugh at us.”
Now, I’m not a Christian anymore but I think it’s reasonable to say that is not an expected response to “what’s your favorite Bible verse or character.” Hell, as an atheist/discordian I can barely stop myself from infodumping my favorites on here. (Judah and Tamar, I also absolutely love Jesus and the Canaanite woman)
“Christian” is more of a cultural/community marker for these people, and a vague “I hope I see grandma again” than it is anything resembling “faith.”
@andros_rex
As a catholic I'm offended, I imagine the red hat crowd adores this... They think he's sooo clever.... he surely didn't think of this on his own,,, he;s really not that clever
As a former Presbyterian and current Deist for lack of a better description, I'm offended by this picture.
I mean, who else are you going to get to run the largest pedophile ring in the world?
He’s certainly got the network.
“She confided in me about her casual ‘friendship’ with Donald. Mr Trump definitely seemed to have a thing for her and she told me how he kept going on about how he liked her ‘pert nipples’,” she testified.
She then described in graphic detail how Mr Trump allegedly caused pain to the victim’s nipples – and claimed she saw the resulting injury firsthand.
In further Left Behind Antichrist parallels, quite a few of the business close to Carpathia get knocked off as he consolidates power. The kind of people who might know where bodies are buried, or what really happened on the night in Epstein’s cell.
Where's Chaim when you need him?
Can someone please link to the image? For some dumb reason, the article writer decided to use a completely different (and real) picture of Trump as the article image, instead of, you know, the image the article is actually about.
The excuse that he posts shitty obnoxious crap “just to piss off the libs” doesn’t fly, because in the end he’s still posting shitty obnoxious crap.
Trump wants a job where one of the rules is no having sex? I don't buy it for a second. Also, imagine the shock wave traveling around the world as every conservative head in America exploded at once if Obama had posted something like this.
It’s like a Bethesda game. Maybe he’ll try to get appointed Dalai Lama and Kwisatz Haderach next. He’s probably got a side path where he’s trying to head the Illuminati (repeatedly discovering it doesn’t exist) and like the Priory of Sion or something.
Maybe we’re living in Thomas Pynchon’s DMT death dream.