this post was submitted on 04 May 2025
114 points (96.7% liked)

Canada

9653 readers
1200 users here now

What's going on Canada?



Related Communities


🍁 Meta


πŸ—ΊοΈ Provinces / Territories


πŸ™οΈ Cities / Local Communities

Sorted alphabetically by city name.


πŸ’ SportsHockey

Football (NFL): incomplete

Football (CFL): incomplete

Baseball

Basketball

Soccer


πŸ’» Schools / Universities

Sorted by province, then by total full-time enrolment.


πŸ’΅ Finance, Shopping, Sales


πŸ—£οΈ Politics


🍁 Social / Culture


Rules

  1. Keep the original title when submitting an article. You can put your own commentary in the body of the post or in the comment section.

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage: lemmy.ca


founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Katheryn Speck said she used to be a Canadian nationalist, travelled the world with a maple leaf on her backpack and once lived in Quebec so she could become fluently bilingual.

But on Saturday she was among hundreds of people who rallied at the Alberta Legislature to support separation from Canada, with many in the crowd waving Alberta flags and a few even displaying the U.S. Stars and Stripes.

"I thought it was a beautiful, fantastic country. But now I'm so disappointed. I'm literally crushed that we'll never be represented in this country and there's never a chance of changing the government," Speck said.

Earlier this week, Premier Danielle Smith's government proposed legislation that would lower the bar for holding a referendum.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] theacharnian@lemmy.ca 23 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

"Once the votes are counted in Ontario, the election is over. We don't matter. We never matter," she said.

You know what Quebeckers do that's smart? They don't have party loyalty. One election, they vote NDP, next one BQ, next LPC, sometimes they give CPC some seats to push them over the edge. We make every single party want to cater to us. We aren't in anyone's pocket.

Do you want to matter? Stop being a fucking CPC stooge.

[–] Tiger666@lemmy.ca 69 points 6 days ago (3 children)

"Never been represented" forgets that there were ten years of conservative government before the liberal one.

Are they for real, or are they always this delusional?

Conservatives are always the perpetual victims

[–] jjjalljs@ttrpg.network 25 points 6 days ago

Conservatives tend to live in an eternal now- what's good for me now? This explains why they don't care about hypocrisy.

[–] dankm@lemmy.ca 7 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (1 children)

But those were Ontario conservatives, not good God fearing Alberta conservatives.

The UCP didn't win the federal election, so they wanna separate.

[–] Tiger666@lemmy.ca 2 points 5 days ago

The UCP are fascist apologists, so they want to align themselves with Herr Drumpf. Ftfy

[–] AGM@lemmy.ca 23 points 6 days ago

I was relieved that the CPC didn't form government, but we're still in a lot of danger. Spend any time on X and you can see a full court press going on with propaganda to push Alberta separatism. The same stuff is going on now in Alberta that took place in Crimea prior to 2014, and the online media ecosystem is American. I see a lot of people stating Alberta couldn't separate because of the treaties, but when a powerful country decides they don't care about the laws, the courts aren't going to save you.

β€œI thought it was a beautiful, fantastic country. But now I’m so disappointed. I’m literally crushed that we’ll never be represented in this country and there’s never a chance of changing the government,” Speck said.

What the fuck. It was only 10 years ago that Conservatives were in power.

[–] DarkWinterNights@lemmy.world 2 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

Literally every single thing Danielle Smith and the UCP espouse to care about is made worse by Alberta becoming a sovereign nation:

  • Taxes
  • Coastal access
  • Pipelines and transfer taxes
  • Tanker access and global markets
  • Trade sanctions as a function of per capita CO2 emissions
  • Infrastructure access
  • Energy markets
  • Codified projects and say in what they detail
  • Comprehensive national strategy cost averaged down against 40 million instead of 4 million (aka costs 10x).

Think about what happens to Albertan property values on separation - literally no one is moving here, and many will leave. The "Alberta Edge" becomes even less tenable, and quality of life rapidly erodes.

But maybe they can empty everyone's pensions before they fuck off into the sunset, once the last drop of blood is squeezed out.

They're really talking about becoming the most taxed 51st state, or an erosion of living standards so sharp they'll get whiplash. Ghoulish politics.

[–] tangonov@lemmy.ca 5 points 5 days ago

Watch out it's the Block Redneckqois

[–] corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca 6 points 5 days ago (1 children)

How do you "win" a rally? Show up, talk sedition, claim victory?

[–] NGnius@lemmy.ca 2 points 5 days ago

Nobody won a rally, it's just a headline that can be parsed to get more than one meaning. I presume this is the correct parsing:

(Subject) [verb] {object}

(Albertans 'crushed' by Liberal election win) [rally] {to separate from Canada}

or phrased less ambiguously:

Albertans who were 'crushed' by the Liberals winning the election went to a rally about separating from Canada

[–] sbv@sh.itjust.works 12 points 6 days ago

I had to read to the bottom for the best part:

"We have the oil, we have the resources. We're fine," Westernaier said, noting she believed Monday's election was rigged.

[–] SirMaple__@lemmy.ca 7 points 6 days ago
[–] nickwitha_k@lemmy.sdf.org 5 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Could you guys trade them for California? And maybe Washington?

[–] HellsBelle@sh.itjust.works 6 points 6 days ago (2 children)

I'm leaning more towards them emigrating somewhere else. If they wanna go that bad, cool. Lots of people out there who would love to buy their property and live peacefully in Alberta.

Send β€˜em down to carve out a piece of Montana. Call it Alberta South. That way Trump gets his 51st state and we get to be rid of the separatists.

[–] nickwitha_k@lemmy.sdf.org 2 points 6 days ago

That's fair.

[–] clonedhuman@lemmy.world 119 points 1 week ago

Fascists get very, very upset when the rest of us, the reasonable people, don't want fascism. They are disappointed in us when we don't want to be ruled by their rulers.

They are truly stupid and harmful human beings and they should be loudly ostracized in every community in which they dare to advocate for fascism.

[–] DaddleDew@lemmy.world 83 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (2 children)

The dipshits in the crowd waving the American flags are the very reason why the rest of Canada dumped the Conservatives in favour of Carney. They are their own enemy.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] kbal@fedia.io 55 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Being so cruelly deprived of oil pipelines, maybe they can claim refugee status in the USA.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] ikidd@lemmy.world 54 points 1 week ago (2 children)

She can yap about it all she wants, there is no support for separatism outside the rabid Wildrose twats. Albertans may vote heavily PC, but this is a complete non-starter.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] PlaidBaron@lemmy.world 48 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Me, a Nova Scotian listening to Albertans whine about how underrepresented they are.

[–] Someone@lemmy.ca 8 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Nova Scotia is kinda over represented though.

[–] PlaidBaron@lemmy.world 1 points 6 days ago (1 children)
[–] Someone@lemmy.ca 8 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (1 children)

Average population per riding federally is about 108000 (2021 numbers). For Nova Scotia it's about 88000. AB, BC, and ON are all around 115000 and Quebec is pretty much the only one right on the average.

Edit: I just did some quick spreadsheet math to see how even it could possibly get with the current total number of seats and making sure the territories each kept their seats: SK -3, NB NL NS PE -2 each, MB -1, NT NU QC YT no change, AB +2, BC +3, ON +7

[–] PlaidBaron@lemmy.world 2 points 6 days ago (1 children)

How do those numbers show NS is over represented?

[–] Someone@lemmy.ca 9 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (1 children)

It is what it is, I'm not complaining, but your MPs represent less people than average. NS isn't even that disproportionate, PEI and the territories are way worse.

MPs/100,000 people
BC 0.86
AB 0.87
SK 1.24
MB 1.04
ON 0.86
QC 0.92
NB 1.29
NS 1.13
PE 2.59
NL 1.37
YT 2.49
NT 2.43
NU 2.71
Canadian average 0.93

If you want to argue whether or not population is actually a good measure of over/under representation that's fine, but you can't argue some people's votes count more or less than others.

[–] PlaidBaron@lemmy.world 5 points 6 days ago

That makes more sense. I genuinely didnt understand what you were getting at with your previous numbers. This isnt Reddit. It was a genuine question.

But yes, I would argue that Alberta has more actual influence due to its far greater economy. Oil money brings with it influence. We shouldnt pretend Canada is above that.

Nova Scotia simpy isnt that big a player in day to day decision making at the federal level. There isnt as much at stake.

[–] Rainbowblite@lemmy.ca 45 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Why is their sense of national unity tied to the success of an industry? Will PEI vote to separate because Canadians aren't eating enough potatoes?

[–] theacharnian@lemmy.ca 6 points 5 days ago (1 children)

They are so brainwashed it boggles the mind. Alberta could be a solar energy powerhouse, they could build shit, develop a manufacturing sector, but no, it has to be fucking oil and gas forever.

[–] NotMyOldRedditName@lemmy.world 4 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

Oil and Gas forever, but also won't build local infrastructure to fully use it, and instead have to ship it elsewhere to refine it etc.

[–] DriftingLynx@lemmy.ca 3 points 5 days ago

I've heard the PEI separatists are calling for a high speed potato-conveyor tube to transport potatoes for shippment to China.

They'll call it the Trans Canada Potatube. And it'll only cost $35 billion and never recoup it's costs.

[–] Ceedoestrees@lemmy.world 44 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (2 children)

Pissed that the rest of Canada won't build pipelines for them. Give them better access to refineries in other provinces. Clearly, leaving the country is the solution.

This is like moving out on your own because your roommates won't clean up after you, and make you pay your share of the bills.

[–] theacharnian@lemmy.ca 4 points 5 days ago

Even the "for them" is such bullshit. It isn't like they are taxing the oil and gas companies to build a better social welfare state. They have the lowest corporate taxes in Canada, very low income taxes, no sales tax. If they wanted they could have made themselves into fucking Norway but no, better lick Oil and Gas boot and identify as a derrick well.

[–] Eranziel@lemmy.world 9 points 6 days ago

I'd say it's more like insisting your parents legally give you their basement as a separate property.

[–] Lulzagna@lemmy.world 44 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

They're so overdramatic

[–] Glide@lemmy.ca 34 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (2 children)

Call me crazy, but I don't want nationalists in this country, full stop. We can love and respect our nation without being worked into a blind, fervent frenzy.

People are real quick to point out that the Nazi's had "socialist" in their party name, and real fuckin' slow to pick up that it was preceded by "national."

[–] CobraChicken3000@lemmy.ca 10 points 1 week ago

I always believed that nationalism stemmed from the idea of the innate superiority of your nation over the others. Which I find incredibly problematic for obvious reasons. Now patriotism, on the other hand, I believe is something that we all should strive for.

[–] 9488fcea02a9@sh.itjust.works 3 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (1 children)

I think the actual term you're looking for is federalist

I think it was the subject of the article who described herself as nationalist

[–] Glide@lemmy.ca 6 points 6 days ago (1 children)

I am not.

Nationalist:

a person who strongly identifies with their own nation and vigorously supports its interests, especially to the exclusion or detriment of the interests of other nations.

Federalist:

a person who advocates or supports a system of government in which several states unite under a central authority.

Both pulled from the OxfordLanguages dictionary that Google uses.

And, of course, Nazi is short for the German pronunciation of "National Socialist."

The problem is not a belief in government. The problem is in the belief that there is something intrinsically better about your nation that gives you justification to look down on other nations. Fuck nationalism.

[–] 9488fcea02a9@sh.itjust.works 4 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Sorry, i misunderstood your comment.

I think we both agree that nationalism sucks, but we want a strong and united canada

[–] M154nthr0p3@lemmy.world 2 points 5 days ago

An apology and a reasonable dialogue. Fuck me, the internet might be OK.

[–] Lemmyoutofhere@lemmy.ca 31 points 1 week ago

What a bunch of snowflakes.

"I thought it was a beautiful, fantastic country. But now I'm so disappointed. I'm literally crushed that we'll never be represented in this country and there's never a chance of changing the government," Speck said.

Maybe you could just campaign for electoral reform instead of separating? Since you're landlocked and all? These people are idiots.

load more comments
view more: next β€Ί