The article stated that there were three shooters, and only two gunshot wounds. I seem to recall from the early '70s that firing squads of five people or so always secretly loaded one weapon with blanks. That way the shooters could all convince themselves that they were the one who had the blank if their conscience bothered them. Maybe these guys did the same thing but with only three shooters...
this post was submitted on 09 May 2025
149 points (98.1% liked)
News
29504 readers
2812 users here now
Welcome to the News community!
Rules:
1. Be civil
Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.
2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.
Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.
3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.
Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.
4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.
Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.
5. Only recent news is allowed.
Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.
6. All posts must be news articles.
No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.
7. No duplicate posts.
If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.
8. Misinformation is prohibited.
Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.
9. No link shorteners.
The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.
10. Don't copy entire article in your post body
For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
I think if you can't find someone with the fortitude to put a hole in the victim's brain stem at muzzle contact range (let's ask the people who pushed for this punishment, for example), and you have to go through all this procedure to alleviate "guilty consciences", maybe the whole idea isn't so great?
While I agree with the conclusion, making a moral judgment based on a random persons guilty conscience isn't very reliable.
We should switch to execution by strangling to death by hand. The judge has to conduct the execution.
Which is dumb because you can clearly tell whether you had the blank or not from the amount of recoil.
That is the protocol in Utah for firing squads, but not South Carolina
As for why Mahdi's body showed two wounds from the execution rather than three, a doctor noted in the comments section on the autopsy commissioned by the state that "it is believed that" two bullets went through one wound. Whereas in Utah, not all members of the state's firing squad shoot live bullets, in South Carolina, the rifles of all three shooters were supposed to be loaded with ammunition.
The two wounds on Mahdi's body were described in the autopsy as being almost exactly the same size. Pathologists who reviewed the report expressed doubt that two bullets went through precisely the same, small hole.
"I think the odds of that are pretty minuscule," Wigren said
load more comments
(1 replies)
Three shooters just isn't enough.
Funny, I think it's three too many.
This shows a number of things. First, how barbarian and backwards death penalty is. Second, Americans are not even good at shooting.
it's out of their culture's preferred shooting range, the elementary school
Come on, everyone always mentions the elementary schools, but we have plenty of other gun ranges. High schools, colleges, workplaces, shopping malls...
movie theaters to really make the action come to life?
''endured pain beyond the “10-to-15 second” window of consciousness that was expected.''
So up to 15 seconds of agony is expected. Fucking barbarians.
load more comments
(1 replies)
If only they were told it was a bad idea of a multitude of reasons.
They don't care. Suffering is the point. They don't want to understand how both revoking due process and allowing cruel and unusual punishment will eventually bite them in the ass.
I am against the death penalty, it's a barbaric practice and not something a civilized country should do.
But for fucks sake, when you decide to have it, why not just heavily sedate someone first, with the help of an anesthesiologist or another medical professional?
Because no medical professional will do it.
It goes completely against the entire pride and ethics of that profession.
You don't put yourself through all the education required to become a physician, to then help kill people against their will.
Met any anti-vax nurses? I guarantee you that you could find some medical professionals who would do it.
I don't know what's more appalling, the number of antivax nurses or the number of people who reference their antivax nurse friends as authoritative sources. They are not doctors. They are not pathologisists. They are not immunologists, biologists, chemists, neurologists, or any other relevant ologists you can think of.
I don't trust the Jiffy Lube oil change tech to diagnose my car's power loss, but I guarantee they'll have some anecdotal ideas because they "hear" about things all the time. I don't trust an experienced mechanic to give a proper statement on reliability, either, because a mechanic will only see cars when they're broken, biasing the sample.
So how do nurses become the voice of fact on this? I mean, I know why. It's confirmation bias. This is more me screaming into the void, fuckin why?
load more comments
(1 replies)
Anti-vax people don't generally hold that stance because they're evil. They're misinformed. Doctor willing to sedate a person whose about to get murdered and one that's sceptical about vaccines is not equivalent.
I don't know for sure if they're all anti-vax, but there are definitely some problems with the kinds of medical professionals prisons often hire
(I could swear I saw a ProPublica article within the last month about how state prison systems all across the country hire doctors who got disciplined or lost their licenses in other states but I can't seem to find it now, so here are some slightly older articles or ones that focus on specific states, but this is definitely still a current problem and not one that just happens in one state or another)
"Many state hospital, prison doctors without medical licenses" (arc)
"Disgraced doctors, unlicensed officials: Prisons face criticism over health care" (arc)
"Nearly one-third of doctors working in Wisconsin's prisons have been censured" (arc)
"When Prison Nurses Must Choose Between Guards & Patients: In dozens of cases, medical personnel in NY prisons were accused of covering up beatings — some under pressure — and rarely faced punishment." (arc)
load more comments
(1 replies)
Anti-vaxxers legitimately believe that vaccines do harm. I don't think that's comparable.
People who promote policies that'll get my kids killed belong in a cage. I don't give a shit about their motivation. And using the word "legitimately" in that context is bizarre anyway. They don't hold a legitimate belief, since their belief is unsupported by facts or reason.
There's way too many that get vaccinations, then turn around and spout anti-vax nonsense for the grift. Going to medical school does not just make you a pood person.
I don't think overdosing someone on morphine or some such anaesthetic or drug requires a medical degree.
load more comments
(1 replies)
load more comments
(2 replies)
The cruelty is the point with these people.
Revenge has to be the only point, considering that it is genuinely cheaper to imprison people for life than it is to go through death row appeals and execute them, even before you include the cost of botching executions and the lawsuits that stem from that. South Carolina choosing firing squad in this case was not only because its harder to botch, but because its virtually impossible to buy the drugs for lethal injection anymore. Even when available, they cost a fortune for the state to procure
The death penalty is just to sate barbaric revenge instincts and nothing else. There is no logical point to it
with the help of an anesthesiologist or another medical professional
Usually medical professionals aren't involved because it's a violation of their oath to do no harm. So then these sadistic bumblefucks just do whatever they want.
Any medical professional would lose their licence if they participated in any way.
load more comments
(1 replies)
Officials placed a hood over Mahdi’s head before the staff fired, according to an Associated Press reporter, who was a witness. As shots were fired, Mahdi cried out and his arms flexed, and after roughly 45 seconds, he groaned twice, the AP said. His breaths continued for around 80 seconds, then a doctor examined him for a minute. He was declared dead roughly four minutes after the shots.
It's a lesser point but still...
At less than five meters they managed to not hit his heart but they did manage to hit his pancreas and liver.
This is two people aiming at a static target, a human being, not moving, and you still managed to get that far off
For the gun touting maniacs that they are, Americans really suck at aiming
Who says they wanted to hit the vital spots?
load more comments
(1 replies)
They're doing firing squad executions still?
Jesus Christ.
There are even sick fucks who want to bring back electrocution.
Recently some states have brought it back specifically. No points for guessing which way those states lean politically.
it's meant to be less shitty than the lethal injection etc.
of course, unless they fuck it up
It's meant to be cheaper, not better. Finding and paying for the drugs has become more difficult.
no, as in the pain and etc is meant to be better.
load more comments
(2 replies)
And in other news, South Carolina introduces bill for executions by dynamite to begin later this year.
The Vatican used to do executions using a big fucking mallet to the head. I'm surprised that hasn't been revived yet in the US.
load more comments
(1 replies)
Is there any good reason why the rifles aren't firmly fixed to a stand so they point directly at the heart, with the shooters only pulling the trigger?
load more comments
(3 replies)
Michael Douglas in Falling Down: "Take shooting lessons, asshole."
Why were they not aiming for the head? 2 headshots would have put him out of his misery instantly even if the 3rd person missed.
It's either because they want to pretend it's a civilized execution method by making it look better or because they want to keep the option of doing it wrong and making the victim suffer longer.
Lol, Americans can’t even use their guns right
view more: next ›