this post was submitted on 09 May 2025
47 points (98.0% liked)

News

29289 readers
3403 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
  • Trump officials mull proposing COFA status to Greenland
  • COFA agreement would see U.S. defending Greenland, but keep island independent
  • Plan faces several practical hurdles

WASHINGTON, May 9 (Reuters) - U.S. officials are discussing a plan to pull Greenland into America's sphere of influence using a type of agreement that the United States has used to keep close ties with several Pacific Island nations, according to two U.S. officials and another person familiar with the discussions.

Under the plan being considered, the Trump administration would propose to Greenland's leaders that the island enter into a so-called Compact of Free Association, or COFA, with the United States.

While the precise details of COFA agreements - which have only ever been extended to the small island nations of Micronesia, the Marshall Islands and Palau - vary depending on the signatory, the U.S. government typically provides many essential services, from mail delivery to emergency management to military protection. In exchange, the U.S. military operates freely in COFA countries and trade with the U.S. is largely duty-free.

President Donald Trump, who during his first administration floated the idea of acquiring Greenland, has pressed even harder since taking office in January, refusing to rule out taking the island by force. Denmark, which governs the island, has sharply rebuffed the idea.

A COFA agreement would stop short of Trump's ambition to make the island of 57,000 people a part of the U.S. It is not the only Greenland plan on the table, the sources said, and it would face many practical hurdles.

Reuters reported before Trump took office that some advisers had informally suggested the idea. But it has not been previously revealed that White House officials have begun talks about the logistics behind such a proposal.

Some officials at the National Security Council and the National Energy Dominance Council, which Trump established, are involved in the talks, two of the sources said. The National Economic Council is also involved, one of those sources added.

COFA agreements have previously been inked with independent countries, and Greenland would likely need to separate from Denmark for such a plan to proceed. While polls show Greenlanders are interested in independence, surveys also show most do not want to be part of the U.S. A COFA - which cedes significant autonomy to Washington - could be viewed with similar skepticism.

top 8 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Stamau123@lemmy.world 29 points 1 day ago (2 children)

"C'mon Greenland, don't you want access to our soon to be gutted usps?"

[–] xenomor@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago

Or the world class bankruptcy machine we call healthcare.

[–] BlameThePeacock@lemmy.ca 11 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Don't forget the new submarine fleet, three new vessels in the last two weeks.

[–] griff@lemmings.world 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

wasn’t it only two 60 million dollar warplanes that fell off that aircraft carrier recently??

[–] BlameThePeacock@lemmy.ca 10 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Nope, it's 3

The third one was technically a friendly fire shoot down, but it still ended up at the bottom of the same sea.

https://www.businessinsider.com/us-aircraft-carrier-red-sea-cost-navy-millions-dollars-mishaps-2025-5

[–] griff@lemmings.world 3 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

It’s a hat trick then—wonder if alcohol was maybe involved in any of these incidents

[–] Bbbbbbbbbbb@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago

Wouldnt you also want to pay massive amounts of out of pocket money for shitty privatized healthcare?

Don't do that, we shouldn't be free to do anything anywhere until we get our leadership under control