this post was submitted on 10 May 2025
102 points (97.2% liked)

Anti-Corporate Movement

630 readers
9 users here now

This community is the first one on lemmy of its kind. It sits between the idea of anarchism/anti-capitalism and left leaning economic policy.

Our goal is to make people aware of the dangers of corporate control, its influence on governments and people as well as the small but steady abrasion of empathy around the world indirectly caused by it.

Current topics this includes but is not limited to:

Feel free to debate this but beware, corporate rhetoric is not welcome here. If you have arguments, bring them on. If its rhetoric trying to defend the evil actions of corporations, we will know and you will go.

Our declared goal so far is to have all companies and individuals worldwide capped at 999 mil USD in all assets, including ownership of other companies, sister companies and marital assets. The reason for this is that companies (and individuals) are not supposed to resemble small(?) countries with a single leader(-board) and shareholder primacy. Thats why we feel like they must be kept in check indefinitely.

But companies will just wander off The argument that large companies will just wander off is valid, which we embrace. We dont need microsoft, apple, google, amazon and other trillion dollar companies. There are small competitors being kept small and driven into brankruptcy by anti competitive behavior of these giants or simply bought up and closed. If starbucks left tomorrow, we would not have an issue with this.

But then we have x little microsofts that all belong to the same person(s) If in fact nobody was allowed to accumulate more than 999 mil in assets, they would not be able to own all these. And like defending agains burglary, it is not about complete defence but time and effort. You only have to keep the thief occupied long enough for them to be caught, give up or make a mistake.

But these giants have tons of IP which would then limit our growth Thats another topic we must touch on. We will (only this one time) take a page out of russias playbook and demand that IP of non complying companies (assets over 999 mil USD) will be declared invalid, which opens them up to be copied.

But then they will "live" in one country that doesnt accept this Correct, and they should be taken into custody the moment they enter the airspace of a country that supports this act.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
top 23 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] gila@lemm.ee 45 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Prevent piracy? They've literally just created another legitimate use case for homebrew. This will cause piracy

[–] haui_lemmy@lemmy.giftedmc.com 16 points 2 weeks ago

Sure hope so

[–] kuneho@lemmy.world 38 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Once a Nintendo update bricked my console. Black screen of death after a brief moment of Nintendo logo. The console was on, the fan was spinning, but that's all.

It's a v1 console, and it booted into Hekate and CFW no problems. So after following a video on YT, I was able to reflash the whole device with the latest firmware.

It works now flawlessly, tho always a bit butt clentching when there's new update. I play online with it a lot on OFW, not even using the CFW for anything. (I have a chipped Lite for all my hacking desires.)

I contacted Nintendo what the fuck is this (prior I think I got shadowbanned in Animal Crossing as well since no online features worked in game), we had shared some emails and that's it. They just ghosted me.

So, if this is the case, people SHOULD hack their Switches, just to have a way to emergency restore their consoles.

[–] can@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Damn, you sold me. Especially if I can still continue to play my legit carts online.

[–] COASTER1921@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Personally I wouldn't trust it even though so far there have been no problems playing online with official firmware on a modded console. It's possible they could detect it in theory and Nintendo does not take unauthorized use lightly, even if you purchased the game and Nintendo online subscription legitimately.

[–] can@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 week ago

I'm in no rush. I figure once the new one comes out they'll give up on the OG in time.

[–] lath@lemmy.world 19 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Are they gonna brick Switches to get ppl to buy the sequel?

[–] haui_lemmy@lemmy.giftedmc.com 11 points 2 weeks ago

Honestly, i dont know at this point. People buying nintendo have no shits left to give anyway i guess.

[–] Mwa@lemm.ee 13 points 2 weeks ago

A reason not to buy anything from Nintendo

[–] bufalo1973@lemm.ee 12 points 2 weeks ago

Another reason to say "fuck you!" to Nintendo.

[–] nao@sh.itjust.works 9 points 2 weeks ago

In the UK version, the digital product may become unusable, in the US version, the device may become unusable:

The agreement for UK accounts now states digital products are "licensed only for personal and non-commercial use", and that any "unauthorised use of a Digital Product may result in the Digital Product becoming unusable".

This differs slightly from the US, which states: "You acknowledge that if you fail to comply with the foregoing restrictions Nintendo may render the Nintendo Account Services and/or the applicable Nintendo device permanently unusable in whole or in part."

[–] hector@sh.itjust.works 6 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

I hope they use the same CPU architecture again (apparently it's been the same since the 3Ds) and people can make an emulator ASAP.

This time around we shouldn't host this on Github but on a Codeberg instance with pseudonyms and VPN so they don't send hitmen to kill us

[–] Coreidan@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago

lol at people who buy Nintendo products

[–] SplashJackson@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 week ago

Nintendo can reserve the right to go fuck themselves!

[–] RedSnt 3 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)


We can't help them folks. They're in a cult. It's the same madness that gets people to buy Apple again and again, perpetually locked into the same ecosystem.

[–] cyborganism@lemmy.ca 4 points 1 week ago

And for what? 80+$ for Nintendo franchise titles that are going to be the same as the last 5 games of that title?

[–] Doomsider@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Would be an awful shame if some hacker bricked every Switch in the world. Probably shouldn't be coding in a kill switch into consumer entertainment devices.

Whoops, I may have just given Nintendo a great idea to increase Switch 2 sales

[–] haui_lemmy@lemmy.giftedmc.com 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Honestly, people in states that allow nintendo to do shit like this kind of deserve it.

[–] Doomsider@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

For sure, we should have laws protecting ownership.

[–] haui_lemmy@lemmy.giftedmc.com 4 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I'd broaden that to laws protecting people. Currently, people look like a commodity in the US.

[–] Doomsider@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

We are sorely missing some serious laws about privacy.

[–] haui_lemmy@lemmy.giftedmc.com 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

That and human rights, taxation of humongous incomes, against fascist takeovers, agaibst forced arbitration, etc

Its painfully obvious now. I hope there is some way back.

[–] Doomsider@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago

It is all very logical, unfortunately they don't write laws for the people in our current system. I am afraid it would take a lot of resistance to change things and most people have been lulled into a learned helplessness state.