this post was submitted on 20 May 2025
9 points (66.7% liked)

Games

39217 readers
2124 users here now

Welcome to the largest gaming community on Lemmy! Discussion for all kinds of games. Video games, tabletop games, card games etc.

Rules

1. Submissions have to be related to games

Video games, tabletop, or otherwise. Posts not related to games will be deleted.

This community is focused on games, of all kinds. Any news item or discussion should be related to gaming in some way.

2. No bigotry or harassment, be civil

No bigotry, hardline stance. Try not to get too heated when entering into a discussion or debate.

We are here to talk and discuss about one of our passions, not fight or be exposed to hate. Posts or responses that are hateful will be deleted to keep the atmosphere good. If repeatedly violated, not only will the comment be deleted but a ban will be handed out as well. We judge each case individually.

3. No excessive self-promotion

Try to keep it to 10% self-promotion / 90% other stuff in your post history.

This is to prevent people from posting for the sole purpose of promoting their own website or social media account.

4. Stay on-topic; no memes, funny videos, giveaways, reposts, or low-effort posts

This community is mostly for discussion and news. Remember to search for the thing you're submitting before posting to see if it's already been posted.

We want to keep the quality of posts high. Therefore, memes, funny videos, low-effort posts and reposts are not allowed. We prohibit giveaways because we cannot be sure that the person holding the giveaway will actually do what they promise.

5. Mark Spoilers and NSFW

Make sure to mark your stuff or it may be removed.

No one wants to be spoiled. Therefore, always mark spoilers. Similarly mark NSFW, in case anyone is browsing in a public space or at work.

6. No linking to piracy

Don't share it here, there are other places to find it. Discussion of piracy is fine.

We don't want us moderators or the admins of lemmy.world to get in trouble for linking to piracy. Therefore, any link to piracy will be removed. Discussion of it is of course allowed.

Authorized Regular Threads

Related communities

PM a mod to add your own

Video games

Generic

Help and suggestions

By platform

By type

By games

Language specific

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

**JuryNow **is a new browser-based game where you ask a yes/no (or Option 1/2) question and get a verdict from 12 strangers around the world in 3 minutes. While you wait, you do 3 minutes of JuryDuty answering other people’s questions. There are comments or discussions, just clean, human decisions.

You can ask a moral dilemma, a big life decision, a workplace problem, or a get a global objective opinion on a family argument, take a mini political poll in real time, or just ask a trivial question. It's also great for fashion choices because you can upload 2 images.

It's fast, social but anonymous, and a little addictive.

⚠️ Since it just launched, if there aren’t 13 players online, the verdict is temporarily simulated which is needed to demonstarate teh how the 3-minute system works. It’s MVP stage, so please help spread the word if you like the concept.

Try it: https://www.jurynow.app/

No ads, no tracking, just pure opinion gameplay. Would love to hear what you think.

top 24 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] slippyferret@lemmy.blahaj.zone 10 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

I was really intrigued by the idea of short “jury duty” sessions with 12 random strangers in which you have to debate and try to come to a consensus on an issue. Disappointed to see it’s just a one-click opinion poll instead.

[–] Stamets@lemmy.world 5 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Yup. That's what got me to click on it too. Really let down by what this actually is.

[–] JuryNow@lemmy.world -2 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Hello Stamets, Thanks so much for playing and sorry you are let down! If you don't mind, would love to tailor my description of JuryNow so it's more accurate and doesn't lead to disappointment! That's the last thing I want!! Now you have played, and assuming it was a live jury of 12 judging your question - whether it's what shirt to wear, or whether to take a 6 month job in Antarctica (my nephew took a 2.5yr one!!) would you be less let down? Thank you again!

[–] Stamets@lemmy.world 2 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I don't even understand what you're trying to ask here

Now you have played, and assuming it was a live jury of 12 judging your question - whether it’s what shirt to wear, or whether to take a 6 month job in Antarctica (my nephew took a 2.5yr one!!) would you be less let down?

[–] JuryNow@lemmy.world 1 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Sorry! Not very clear!! What I mean is that if you had asked an actual question - and had received a live Jury verdict - would you feel less let down?

[–] wolframhydroxide@sh.itjust.works 5 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (2 children)

I think that the thing that let them down was that they didn't actually get to participate in any discussion or consensus-building. I think that the ideal scenario to solve this issue is a quick chatroom amongst simultaneous players, in which topics for discussion are briefly discussed for a few minutes, then voted on, like a real jury. It could include deliberation, but the question writer would only see the verdict. I will tell you that I would personally play this if it followed this method:

Make it fewer players per question (like 5 or 7), so that it doesn't take an hour. Each submits a question. Make it so that, while your question is being considered, you are in another jury room deliberating on another question. Make deliberations timed (say, 3-5 minutes per question), so that no one is in a lobby waiting to serve on a jury for too long. Then, after serving on a number of juries equal to the number of jurors (5-7), they can view their verdict. This would allow for the deliberation these people are suggesting.

[–] JackbyDev@programming.dev 1 points 2 weeks ago

This was what I understood stamets to mean as well. I thought it was pretty obvious. I had the same thought opening it. Still cool though.

[–] JuryNow@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

Thanks so much Wolf! Much appreciated

[–] JuryNow@lemmy.world 1 points 2 weeks ago

Hello Slippy, Thanks so much for playing! It's super exciting to see feedback and I'm really grateful you took time to come back to Lemmy & let me know what you think! I think Lemmy & sites like Reddit are amazing and revolutionary for that debate, discussion open conversation type of situation they create. So if it's a peer group conversation you want whether it's office attire, family row, political debate...that is where you would go. JuryNow is more about a very diverse group of 12 people from Guatemala, Germany, Gambia, Georgia who are made up of all ages, cultures, professions, giving you a verdict that is pure unadulterated wisdom! The more diverse the jury, the better the verdict! And so while the JuryDuty can feel la bit like a chore, the part where you get your verdict from 12 real people is exciting if it's your own quesiton, and you know that 12 people have just considered it! Well this is what I hope and when lots of people are playing online simultatneously and all the juries are live, it works! But I'm learning that the negative feedback is a load more valuable in some ways! REally appreciate it!

[–] Stamets@lemmy.world 7 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Ah yes. "Gameplay" and "Addictive".

Would love to hear what you think

No, you don't.

[–] JuryNow@lemmy.world 2 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

oh! I'm sorry you say that because I genuinely want to hear every word of feedback! I have had the idea fo 16 years and only just worked out how to build an app with no code in the past year...It's taken me forever to produce it, so i really do want to hear your thoughts! (be gentle, I'm nearly a pensioner! -)

[–] Stamets@lemmy.world 2 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

I was taught that if you don't have anything nice to say then you shouldn't say it. That isn't a lesson that I always follow, but it is one that I want to follow here. That's more what I meant on the no, you don't.

I have no constructive feedback that I can provide you at this time and I don't want to be actively cruel. One of my criticisms is completely out of your hands because it is the questions being asked at this time. But other things... I have no idea or alternative I can provide for things I do not like. What I thought this was is also so very different from what it is that there's no point in discussing that because it would be like trying to drive a Buick the next star system over, not the tool for the job. Due to this, I don't want to just list things that I dislike and be discouraging.

But I wish you best of luck.

[–] JuryNow@lemmy.world 1 points 2 weeks ago

Thank you Stamets - I like your honestly and I have taught that lesson too! I tell you what would really help me more - if you wouldn't mind sharing the games you have developed or the types of games you like playing! I'm guessing if it's more action/scifi, then JuryNow might not appeal? (not necessarily mutually exclusive, but possibly a different gendre!!)

[–] Konraddo@lemmy.world 3 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Genuine question. Why is this a game? Don't the players just answer questions?

[–] JuryNow@lemmy.world 2 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

That's a point that my daughter has also asked because she says there are no winners therefore it can't be a game! It's a game mainly because it's fun when you receive your verdict knowing that 12 random people from anywhere in the world have just answered your question - whether it's what shirt looks best or whether to move house. It's also a game because there is a subtle team at play which you will never know...while playing JuryDuty you are answering with 11 other anonymous team members. It's a more of a game when you are actually asking a question (not just trying the JuryDuty trial round - that's more to get an idea of the game). Also, this is just the MVP, but the real model will be more "gamification" with User Stats, and rewards for playing streaks or contributing to different verdicts etc....Have I changed your mind a teensy bit? I can't tell you HOW incredibly helpful it is to get feedback! and I'm genuinely grateful for you playing & taking time to comment back!! Thank you Konrad!

[–] Konraddo@lemmy.world 1 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I see. So it's like "Ask a friend" of anything. It's a useful application though, if the responses come quick, with more users joining of course. Say, I got two outfits to wear and I want opinions. If users disclose their nationality, occupation, age group and gender, I'd want to know the responses come from say, all male, then I know people of my gender that have such and such jobs wear similarly so I'll be more confident in choosing the outfit. I still don't think it's a game. You can make it fun to help out others by including daily quest, points system etc. Otherwise, I don't know why I would want to spend my free time on others.

[–] JuryNow@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

Thank you Konrad! Exactly, except rather than a friend or someone from your peer group, it's a totally diverse group of all ages from all countries in the world, giving you an objective opinion - the type of feedback & verdict you wouldn't encounter in your daily life. So the outfit concept is a great one - say you are wearing something standard is your country - let's just guess Hungary. But what do people in Ghana and Guetemala and Hong Kong think on it? It's a snap decision between two outfits based on people from age 16 - 99. (I have seen a 13 year old and a 93 year old play & enjoy it, so ok, 99 is maybe exaggerating; and actually the age limit is 16+) . The reciprocity part is curcial though!

[–] Otherbarry@lemmy.frozeninferno.xyz 1 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (2 children)

So does it ever tell you what the jury verdict is? I've done like 12 answers and there's no visible confirmation that there were other people answering the same question let alone what the final verdict was. Kind of kills the vibe, was hoping I'd at least see what the other random anonymous jurors responded to the same question(s).

Also would be more interesting if the site would publicly show the questions/verdicts as they come in. (assuming the person submitting the question is okay with it showing up publicly on the site)

[–] Airowird@lemm.ee 1 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Also would be more interesting if the site would publicly show the questions/verdicts as they come in.

  • Was the moonlanding fake? 3/9
  • Did Bush know 9/11 was gonna happen? 8/4
  • Was Hitler right, though? 11/1
  • Was Thanos wrong? 6/6 (forced by Thanos to be perfectly balanced)

That's fair, LOL.

[–] JuryNow@lemmy.world 1 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

hello there Barry, thank you so much for playing firstly! You never get to see other player's verdicts for a few reasons....no confirmation bias, it keeps it's anonymous, and - when I launch the proper version - it will be one free play per day so it keeps it more of a daily ritual, rather than playing too many loops (this is because empathy & objectivity decline after a while!) But THANK YOu for the feedback. I'm also thinking of having a feature where you can opt to share your question and verdict, and you can opt to ask for it. Do you think that would work too? (lots of people have asked this, including my chronically curious bf!)

[–] Otherbarry@lemmy.frozeninferno.xyz 1 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Opt-in might work. But thinking more about it, not sure if it would be too much of a headache to manage.. I'd think you may end up having to moderate what actually shows up publicly on the site else you end up with the sorts of questions/answers that the other commenter mentioned.

[–] JuryNow@lemmy.world 0 points 2 weeks ago

Thank you again Barry!

[–] JuryNow@lemmy.world -1 points 2 weeks ago

Some recent examples on JuryNow to help you get started: Is immigration good for the economy? Yes/No, Is it bad to be honest with people and tell them that children born now are likely to have a terrible life growing up because of global warming? Yes/No My boyfriend say my sneezes are too loud and annoy him and i need to supress them. it's true they are loud, but i have hayfever and it's painful to keep them in. Supress/Don't supress Do you avoid walking under ladders even if it means being quite obvious and superstitious? Silly superstition/Avoid ladders My brother is struggling to graduate college - and I helped him get through and pass his senior year courses. He got into grad school, and I’m worried he will be leaning on me again. tell him not to go to Grad School/tell him I won't help Someone keeps ripping down my LGBTQ activism stickers off of lightposts. Should I super glue them or give up? Stop putting up posters/Use superglue