this post was submitted on 29 May 2025
372 points (99.7% liked)

Privacy

2358 readers
911 users here now

Welcome! This is a community for all those who are interested in protecting their privacy.

Rules

PS: Don't be a smartass and try to game the system, we'll know if you're breaking the rules when we see it!

  1. Be civil and no prejudice
  2. Don't promote big-tech software
  3. No apathy and defeatism for privacy (i.e. "They already have my data, why bother?")
  4. No reposting of news that was already posted
  5. No crypto, blockchain, NFTs
  6. No Xitter links (if absolutely necessary, use xcancel)

Related communities:

Some of these are only vaguely related, but great communities.

founded 6 months ago
MODERATORS
 

Paywall-free: https://archive.is/8wl6n

top 27 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Nikls94@lemmy.world 101 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Isn’t this some misuse of power felony?

[–] LWD@lemm.ee 80 points 4 days ago (2 children)

I assumed American police just have infinite power and, more recently, extra legal protection on top of it

[–] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 27 points 4 days ago

Probably will get a lovely paid vacation if anything

[–] Retreaux@lemmy.world 13 points 4 days ago (1 children)

⬆️⬆️⬇️⬇️⬅️➡️⬅️➡️🅰️🅱️, don't forget start and select!

[–] Maestro@fedia.io 11 points 4 days ago (3 children)

I'm pretty sure it's BA, not AB

[–] LWD@lemm.ee 6 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Where's the C come into this

[–] Zorque@lemmy.world 4 points 3 days ago (1 children)
[–] itsralC@lemm.ee 3 points 3 days ago

Sega Megadrive

[–] thefartographer@lemm.ee 5 points 4 days ago

Don't tell me how to cheat!

[–] zod000@lemmy.ml 2 points 3 days ago

You are quite correct. This guy isn't getting any extra lives, just extra embarrassment.

[–] krigo666@lemmy.world 67 points 4 days ago

Facism becoming public.

[–] Sunshine@piefed.social 26 points 3 days ago

"Protecting" women my foot.

[–] Maeve@kbin.earth 37 points 3 days ago

Regardless of gender, ethnicity, or age, if the implications of stories like this aren't bothering you, you're failing to grasp the implications.

[–] CobraChicken3000@lemmy.ca 38 points 4 days ago

This is some Fugitive Slave Act bullshit

[–] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 37 points 4 days ago (1 children)
[–] LWD@lemm.ee 26 points 4 days ago

It's the freest state in the conf– Union, don't you know

[–] AfricanGray@piefed.social 28 points 3 days ago (1 children)
[–] Revan343@lemmy.ca 6 points 3 days ago

Government so small it fits in your uterus

[–] zephorah@lemm.ee 24 points 3 days ago (2 children)

Don’t cops have jurisdictional boundaries?

[–] Zorque@lemmy.world 31 points 3 days ago

Only if they're enforced.

[–] Jimmycakes@lemmy.world 4 points 3 days ago

The family reported the person missing so they probably got around it

[–] nothingcorporate@lemmy.world 15 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Damnit, were the sovereign citizens right about not having license plates?!?!!

Just gotta put a gold fringe on the license plate and then it's not an American license plate it is a Navel license plate and they no longer have jurisdiction.

[–] njordomir@lemmy.world 19 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Perhaps I'm missing this in the article:

Presumably towns, cities, and state agencies are the ones buying these cameras. Are they able to opt out of data sharing or manually control requests? If not, is there anyone working to put these cameras on procurement blacklists?

[–] _cryptagion@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 3 days ago

The government doesn’t want to blacklist them. These cameras aren’t being misused, this is exactly why they are being installed by cities across the nation. They’re fine with them being used for shit like this because they know that when it comes to go on their own witch hunts, they’ll be able to.

And to top it off, the local politicians in charge of deciding things get a nice kickback from Flock.

[–] Someonelemmy@lemmynsfw.com 10 points 3 days ago
[–] Retreaux@lemmy.world 3 points 4 days ago

Fuck you're right hahahaha