Looking at the discussion, these are folks we don't want here anyway ya know. They're kind of adverse to high quality commentary and primarily prefer bitching to effort.
this post was submitted on 21 Jun 2025
53 points (100.0% liked)
Fedibridge
731 readers
50 users here now
A community to organize and discuss the growth of the fediverse as a whole
Related communities
Megathreads
founded 4 months ago
MODERATORS
The purpose of a debate is to change the minds of those watching, not the person you are arguing with.
Just upvoted it, it stands at +5 now
Also, waht the heck, they are considering iris scanning for Reddit? x)
Probably bots lol
As if reddit isn't dead enough
Will this keep Redditors saying other alternatives like Lemmy are not worth it?
Lemmy sucks regardless what Reddit does. // Its not mutually exclusive, they both suck.
Every fucking thing sucks. If you want the perfect place, tough luck - you won't get it, ever.
So instead you look for the place that sucks the least, given your priorities. And when one place is becoming shittier by the day (like Reddit), the others (like Lemmy) do become more attractive.
The Great Shit Equilibrium
Yup, pretty much.
And there's more: if, hypothetically speaking, we could make a platform completely shit-free, people migrating to that platform would bring their own shit with them, so the platform would be shitty again. As if there was some sort of equilibrium to be restored.
...I'm going to call this Le Shitalier's principle.
When reactants > shittiness the equilibrium lies to the right.
the all-or-nothing folks just grinds my gears. they're here too lol, just different flavors.
Perhaps the relative amount of all-or-nothing folks is different, but you're right - they're here too. And everywhere in the internet.
In fact, I have a hypothesis that four donkeymen are to blame for most social media woes:
- Decontextualisation - when some info or reasoning is present in the context, disregard it.
- Assumption - when some info or reasoning is absent from the text, make the opposite up.
- Oversimplification - when it's too much info or reasoning, disregard even critical bits.
- Genetic fallacy - when the info or reasoning comes from a specific source, automatically label it true or false.
The all-or-nothing folks sit squarely at #3; for them gradients - like "Lemmy has some shit, Reddit has more shit, thus Lemmy is less worse than Reddit" - are hateful, too much info, too "hard", too "I don't understand, I'm so confused...". It's simpler to say "Lemmy has shit, Reddit has shit, both equal, EDIT WOW THANKS FOR THE GOLD KIND STRANGER!!1ONE".
Spot on
The perfect place wouldn't allow them anyway.
The perfect place wouldn’t allow them [people bringing their own shit?] anyway.
As in, isolating the system? No perfect isolation is possible; and even if it was, it would limit the amount of information/entropy of the place. In other words the community would get stale and die.
We could pretend moderators are like Maxwell's demon, able to sift the newbies one by one; if they're bringing shit, don't let them in. The amount of energy necessary to do so makes it unfeasible.
No, im saying "no club that would have them could possibly meet their standards". That they are themselves a flaw they would not tolerate.
mods are like maxwells demon
I'm stealing this for my own personal concept of the world and ignoring the rest of what you said in favor of a more fun idea.
If we wish to achieve cosmism, we must make more forums with more moderators, and also ideally making them as small as we can. It's the only way. We can fix everything.
Got it - sorry for the confusion then!
And I need to admit that your take of the mod = Maxwell's demon thing is way more interesting.
your idea
Hey, credit where it's due. This is yours, im just running with it. The rest of what you're saying isn't about pseudo mystical hard scifi space communism though. Boring.
Well, at least they'll make some Worldcoin (if that still exists lol).
Supposedly, it will give everyone UBI through worldcoin.
This is so fucking stupid.